Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Wales confirm one of their toughest ever November series schedules

Wales' Alun Wyn Jones (Photo by Stu Forster/Getty Images)

Wales have confirmed one of their toughest ever November schedules for Cardiff are revealing their will host Fiji, New Zealand, Argentina and South Africa later this year.

ADVERTISEMENT

By the time Wayne Pivac’s side take on the Springboks on November 28, they will have faced every side in World Rugby’s top eleven – minus Australia (eighth) – during his first year at the helm.  

The 2020 November series also see a new era of collaboration for the Six Nations Unions after they combined all broadcasting rights for these internationals, a strategy that has long been in place for the Guinness Six Nations. 

Supporters will now benefit directly as all parties agree to games being scheduled around each other to minimise any overlap in fixtures. 

“Working collaboratively with fellow Six Nations members on matters of mutual sporting and commercial interest outside the Guinness Six Nations Championship has for the first time led to scheduling that is far more spectator-friendly,” said WRU chief executive Martyn Phillips. 

(Continue reading below…)

Are Wales about to abandon their 60-cap rule?

Video Spacer

“A coordinated approach, similar to the one already employed when facilitating the championship fixtures, has removed the majority of schedule clashes and we are extremely grateful to all parties for their sympathetic treatment of the unique and particular requirements of our Cardiff city-centre venue. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“We are delighted with three Saturday afternoon matches and an early Sunday kick-off which shows real empathy to supporters in Wales and to our travel infrastructure. 

“This is the first step in the process of unifying the operations and media rights of the Six Nations and federations, something we have been working on for a long time. It is a hugely significant strategic development for our national game and will be of direct benefit supporters who will be able to watch more live matches as a result.”

Wales’ 2020 autumn series

v Fiji – Saturday, November 7 (1pm)

v New Zealand – Saturday, November 14 (5.30pm)

v Argentina – Sunday, November 22 (2.15pm)

v South Africa – Saturday, November 28 (5.30pm)

WATCH: The Rugby Pod previews the third round of the Guinness Six Nations 

ADVERTISEMENT
Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 1 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

11 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific
Search