Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

RFU anti-doping report - professional rugby is clean; amateur rugby, not so much...

By Ian Cameron
The RFU published their anti-doping report today

If the results of the RFU Anti Doping report are anything to go by, then the professional game in England does not have an overt problem with performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs).

ADVERTISEMENT

However the report also acknowledges that PED use at an amateur level and attitudes to supplements among age grade players are very real issues for the sport to contend with.

The big takeaway from the report which was published today is that the professional game in England appears to be clean, in so far as their testing can confirm.

According to the report: “In season 2016/17 there were no anti-doping violations within the professional game in England, which is consistent with previous seasons.”

The report shows that 623 samples were taken; 537 of which were urine, while 86 (14 percent) were blood.

Eighty-seven percent of tests were taken out of the competition, with 156 tests being taken during International competitions. The tests were carried out by World Rugby, the RFU and the Six Nations – with the vast bulk (140) being carried out by World Rugby.

As the report points out, the last anti-doping violation for a performance-enhancing drug from a professional player was in season 2010/11.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, one player was found guilty of an illicit substance violation during the 2016/17 season, namely cocaine. The RFU policy states that: “Strict confidentiality is maintained for all admissions of use and violations where it is a first offence.”

A total of 302 urine and hair samples were collected at all Aviva Premiership clubs throughout the season relating to illicit drug use, although the RFU point out ‘It is important to note, however, that RFU Illicit Drugs tests are not WADA accredited and do not form part of the anti-doping programme.’

While English professional rugby has passed with flying colours, the report bears out the consensus that at the amateur level of the game, PED use is present to a degree.

Of 119 samples collected from amateur rugby, there were three violations, representing nearly 3 percent of players tested. A fourth case is still in ‘the case management process’ and could yet be deemed a violation.

ADVERTISEMENT

Of the three confirmed violations, two were for anabolic steroid use (Drostanolone) and one was for cocaine. The two found guilty of using steroids were banned for four years, while the player caught with cocaine in their system was banned for two years.

Research undertaken by the RFU involving 987 schoolboys unearthed some worrying trends, especially with regards to perceptions around substances used by young people playing rugby.

Steve Grainger, the RFU’s Rugby Development Director said: “Publication of the latest findings from our joint research project with Leeds Beckett University shows a worrying lack of awareness in age-grade players, particularly around the use of supplements and hence raising the risk of vulnerability to doping.”

The report noted: “Use of banned substances was appraised to be a serious issue in school that needs attention. A degree of willingness to try a ‘risky’ substance was also noted.

“Nutritional supplement use is prevalent among English schoolboys. Schoolboy rugby union players report the highest susceptibility to doping among those sampled, compared with other athletes and non-athletes.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 53 minutes ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

11 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE What assistant coaches actually do, and why Parling and Bleyendaal will succeed What assistant coaches actually do, and why Parling and Bleyendaal will succeed
Search