'We have always been open to conversations with Wales and Scotland about the possibility of Team GB'
England rugby chiefs insist they not scrapping their Sevens squad but admit they are in talks with Wales and Scotland in a bid to create a Great Britain team aimed at mounting a serious challenge for gold at future Olympic Games.
However, it is understood the Scots are lukewarm to the idea of giving up their own separate identity on the HSBC World Rugby Sevens Series, particularly as they are the country that created the shortened version of the sport which made its Olympic debut in Rio.
England, Scotland and Wales are currently involved in the Sevens series with the top four teams automatically gaining places in the draw in next year’s Olympics in Japan and the other slots will be decided after qualifying tournaments.
Great Britain claimed silver in Rio after being beaten by Fiji in the final and Nigel Melville, the acting Rugby Football Union chief executive told RugbyPass any discussions over a GB team were at a early stage and did not signal the demise of the England Sevens squad.
The RFU is looking to cut costs of around £10m a year due to a predicted drop in future earnings forcing belt tightening. Last year 60 staff were made redundant by the sport’s biggest and richest Union and further cuts are in the pipeline.
Continue reading below…
Watch: Eddie Jones speaks to RugbyPass ahead of Six Nations game against Italy.
However, Melville said: “We are always looking for ways to make our teams more competitive and Team GB is one of the models we have been looking at but we are not about to axe the England Sevens squad. That is not what we have been talking about. Could we change the way we do Sevens? Absolutely. There are many different things we could do and if we went down the GB route we could put other teams into the European circuit.
“People are just jumping on one thing and saying that we are going to axe the Sevens team and that is clearly not the case. We have always been open to conversations with Wales and Scotland about the possibility of Team GB being on the Sevens circuit at some point to make us more competitive at the Olympics.”
The RFU spent £70million on the professional game last season but the majority is committed to legally binding agreements with the Premiership clubs and payments to England players. The RFU signed a £220million, eight-year deal with Premiership clubs in 2016. The RFU is forecast to lose more than £10million next year because of the costs of the World Cup in Japan and the resulting loss of up to four autumn Test matches.
Watch: Nathan Hughes speaks exclusively to RugbyPass
Comments on RugbyPass
Mad how this somehow contained absolutely zero information.
1 Go to commentsI’m looking forward to attending the Twickenham match, I don’t think it will have a bearing on the outcome of the grand prize itself but it will tell us more about each teams’ preparation and game plan. It’s hard to look past one of the big four (I’m including Canada) lifting the trophy in 2025 but sport is a curious thing, there will still be twists and turns in road ahead.
2 Go to commentsThe better side seems to be the losing side a lot these days. As far as narrative goes. Must be the big emergent culture of “participation awards” that have emerged in nanny states. ”It looked like New Zealand would take the game from there but lapses in execution let South Africa get back into the game. New Zealand’s goal kickers left five points out there, including a very make-able penalty on the stroke of half”. Sounds like a chronic problem… I wonder how the better team has lapses in concentration and execution? Or are those not important factors in the grand scheme of total performances? In 2023, the ABs at least didn’t give up a lead to lose. They just couldn’t execute to get the points and take the lead. This Baby AB result points to a choke - letting the game slip through your fingers. In the words of the great Ricky Bobby’s dad - “If you’re not 1st you’re last!” Loosely translated - if you didn’t win, you’re a loser.
9 Go to commentsWith Stuart Lancaster at the helm, Racing 92 looks more and more a mercenaries club like Toulon some years ago and they are not even performing despite all the money on offer.
4 Go to commentsCouple of things BS missed: wind was behind the Baby Blacks in the first half. Baby Boks got points from a scrum penalty in the final quarter against this ‘dominant pack’, and left three points on the park after a missed penalty.
9 Go to commentsSensible thoughts on this, Brett. Also worth considering we’ve sold 60k tickets for a game between the Rebels and the Lions next year. Got to be roughly $10m in ticket and game day revenue there.
5 Go to commentsUnsuccessful bitter ex Ulster player taking a pop shot at a side that isn't including his consistently poor mates up north
4 Go to commentsHis decision to play in France isn’t a petulant decision as this article suggests. I reckon that France is the perfect place to demonstrate that he can mix it in those battles Rassie references. It’s a good decision to try get into the squad. My personal opinion is that he wins more battles than he loses. I don’t have Rassie’s stats machine behind me, but Daymian’s is so strong moving through traffic and in the rip.
4 Go to commentsWow! Argie forward dominance is something I have not read in years….
1 Go to commentsIs the ‘snub’ really why he is leaving? He hasn’t said that has he? You don’t have to stay in SA to play for the Boks, so it’s not that he’s giving up on trying to get into the squad as the case would be in, say, England or New Zealand. Rassie made it clear that the early camps won’t feature all the players to play for the Boks this year so I can’t imagine Dayimani was too offended by being overlooked this time. It just seems like a sensationalist angle to take for a story without really knowing the player’s intentions.
4 Go to commentsWell, it is easily one of the best Irish sides, it’s just that their historical standard is very low.
4 Go to commentsThe Irish side is good. They have lost 2 games in the last 23 tests. In the last 12 months they have have a 60% win rate against the top 5 sides in the world. Over the same period south africa have a 67% win rate against the top 5 teams, and New Zealand are at 40%.
4 Go to commentsOnly 1247 days until RWC 2027 starts Bin Smuth🤣Can’t wait to see how unhinged you’re still gonna get between now & then
200 Go to commentsany chance either team will improve on their u20 world cup performances this time around? I assume both sides will be deeply disappointed with how things went.
6 Go to commentsAnother poor articles by a poor journo, nothing new from Ben, at least you are consistently bad lol, geez I will try and watch the match later, clearly Benny was only looking to one end of the pitch, hard to tell whom the Baby Blacks were playing if it wasn’t in the header 😄😄
9 Go to commentsNz should have won. I didn't watch the game, but the ref was at fault and the bounce of the ball and the Bokke used the Bomb squad and the Bokke slow the game down and the Bokke scrum. They should remove the scrum. The Bokke are to strong. Not fair. Nz should have won
9 Go to commentsProbably the worst article on a rugby match I have ever read
200 Go to commentsWho hurt this man.. LoL 😭
200 Go to commentsIt unfortunate for the Jaguares that they became formidable just as super rugby as we knew came to an end. However, the idea of bringing them back is nonsensical. While I enjoyed the Jaguares and the South African flavour of the comp, a selling point of this incarnation of super rugby is that all games are on a decent time for an Aussie audience.
5 Go to commentslol that’s your opinion Ben, All Blacks benefited from a forward pass try, SA played 77 min without a recognised hooker, missed a no try conversion and a penalty could have would have but didn’t
200 Go to comments