Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Wallabies player ratings vs Argentina | The Rugby Championship

Argentina's Los Pumas centre Santiago Chocobares (C) tackles Australia's Wallabies centre Len Ikitau (R) during the Rugby Championship Test match between Argentina and Australia at the UNO Jorge Luis Hirschi Stadium in La Plata, Buenos Aires Province, on August 31, 2024. (Photo by JUAN MABROMATA / AFP) (Photo by JUAN MABROMATA/AFP via Getty Images)

The Wallabies met Argentina in cold and wet conditions at Estadio Jorge Luis Hirschi and came away with a 20-19 win.

ADVERTISEMENT

Joe Schmidt’s Wallabies looked like Ireland in early stages after putting 27 phases together on one possession.

However, issues at the maul continued as the Pumas enjoyed a fruitful return from the set-piece, scoring their first 10 points off the maul.

Video Spacer
Video Spacer

The Wallabies battled through issues on kick receipts, failing to secure restarts after scoring points, but won enough momentum to get home on a Ben Donaldson penalty in the 80th minute. Here’s how they rated.

1. Angus Bell – 8
Defensively put in a big shift with nine tackles in the first half and finished with 17. Had one monstrous chop tackle on Pablo Matera and produced a game-high five dominant hits. Produced a key turnover assist early in the second half with a strong tackle, aided by Tizzano. Australian scrum was good, on balance better than Argentina, but the maul defence was once again the Achilles heel. Bell was typically strong across the park.

2. Matt Faessler – 8
Conceded a ruck penalty gave Argentina a line out drive from the five which they scored their first from. He threw very well at the line out in trying conditions, particularly throws to the tail. Australia finished 100 per cent from the their line out from 11 throws. Logged 13 tackles in his 64 minutes.

3. Taniela Tupou – 6
Looked strong as usual but didn’t impact the game he would have liked with limited carries. He did win a penalty on the first push at scrum time. Desperation at the maul gave away a penalty on halfway. Will be better for the run. Off at 47 minutes.

ADVERTISEMENT

4. Nick Frost – 6
A mixed bag from Frost who had a high work rate but had four turnovers conceded. Conceded penalty on maul defence early which gave Los Pumas their first three points. Contested well against the throw. Was vital in the rucks, pouncing on one loose ball for a turnover. Forced a critical turnover with pressure eight minutes from time in his own 22. Had six tackles and was the top line out target with five takes.

5. Lukhan Salakaia-Loto – 7
Early cold drop on first possession was not a good start, but recovered after that to take his next few carries. Had a nice line out steal midway through the first half and pressured the opposition line out often. Produced some dominant hits in bursts. Finished with 10 tackles. One of his better nights in Wallaby gold. Off at 48.

6. Rob Valetini – 7
A typically class showing from Valetini. Carried strongly and was the primary option powering the Wallabies phase play attack. Always a strong presence in contact on defence. Powered over from close range for a try after the best period of Wallabies’ attack in the game.

7. Carlo Tizzano – 8.5
The workhorse got through a lot on defence, making 22 tackles. Won a big ruck penalty on Chocobares as Argentina broke into the Wallabies’ 22 to save Australia in a bad situation. Stole another early in the second on a loose ball, and won a second ruck penalty which led to the Lolesio’s last penalty goal. Overall a big night from Tizzano. Off at 73.

ADVERTISEMENT

8. Harry Wilson – 7
Led from the front with good leg drive on his carries, often as the tip runner. Was a bit lucky on a tackle on a falling runner. Had one error, dropped the ball on a kick receipt after Wallabies first try, but was otherwise reliable. Wasted a golden opportunity going down the short side early in the second half, but it was repeated efforts that made a difference. Credited with two turnovers, Wilson finished with 15 tackles and eight carries.

9. Jake Gordon – 8
Improved kicking game against Argentina. His first box kick forced an error and most were in the contestable range. His distribution was solid as the Wallabies were able to play high possession rugby. Bagged the first try on a classic halfback support line. A much better showing from the Waratahs’ No 9.

10. Noah Lolesio – 8
A steady hand from Lolesio, using short passes in Australia’s attack. Kicking out of hand was improved, however his grubber in early play gave up a huge territory loss. Pushed a long-range penalty goal wide right on half-time but kicked the rest. Most impressive was his poise and control with ball-in-hand, not overplaying in the conditions. The Wallabies’ attack was gelling without being explosive. Was reliable in the backfield diffusing kicks, spilling just one late. Came up with a big line break with minutes remaining that won key field position. The kind of game Lolesio needed.

11. Marika Koroibete – 5
Eager and industrious, but often overly keen. Gave a penalty for taking a player in the air on a kick chase. Another aggressive tackle was deemed okay but treaded the line for no arms. Positives were his work rate off the wing, looking for work and getting a lot of carries around the park. Finished with two penalties conceded.

12. Hamish Stewart – 7
Played a second distributor role in the midfield which suited his game. Filled in at first receiver when Lolesio was out of play. Had decent ruck contest but conceded a penalty once going off feet. In defence wasn’t a dominant force but completed his tackles at a high rate against a bigger Pumas’ midfield. A debut to remember and a steady showing.

13. Len Ikitau – 9
The spark the Wallabies needed to get the win. Best attacking player on the night. He was a strong midfield crash option against the Pumas and showed some nice touches of distribution. Put Tom Wright through a half gap on the Wallabies first try. Threaded a nice long grubber to force a five metre scrum. Again, sparked the lead-up work for the second try breaking two or three tackles before finding an offload for Koroibete to create momentum. Five defenders beaten,

14. Andrew Kellaway – 6
A quiet game for Kellaway with play not coming wide often in the wet conditions. Linked well on counter attack and often made the right play. Sometimes that’s the life of a wing.

15. Tom Wright – 6
Cleaned up the backfield well in the first half. Burst through the Pumas’ defence on a ruck play and got a brilliant offload away for Gordon on the inside for a key try. Showed some elusive running on kick returns.

Reserves

16. Josh Nasser – 5 – On at 64. The reserve front row kept a solid scrum for the Wallabies, winning a big penalty at 74 minutes. One carry
17. Isaac Kailea – N/A – On at 55 off at 73. One carry and one tackle, a key one on the goal line, before going off injured.
18. Allan Alaalatoa – 6 – On at 48. Six tackles for the veteran prop with a nice cameo.
19. Jeremy Williams – 5 – On at 48. A couple of tackles and a couple of key line out takes down the stretch.
20. Langi Gleeson – N/A – On at 73.
21. Tate McDermott – 5 – On at 66. Played for territory using the box kick as conditions got worse. Offered direction as the Wallabies marched down on the winning possession.
22. Ben Donaldson – 5 – On at 75. Produced the game-winning kick from directly in front from his brief time on the pitch.
23. Max Jorgensen – N/A – On at 66. Spilled the ball on his only real opportunity, but it all worked out.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

Singapore SVNS | Day 2

Boks Office | Episode 39 | The Investec Champions Cup is back

Argentina v France | HSBC SVNS Hong Kong 2025 | Men's Match Highlights

New Zealand v Australia | HSBC SVNS Hong Kong 2025 | Women's Match Highlights

Tokyo Sungoliath vs Shizuoka BlueRevs | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

Reds vs Force | Super Rugby W 2025 | Full Match Replay

The Rise of Kenya | The Report

New Zealand in Hong Kong | Brady Rush | Sevens Wonders | Episode 4

The Fixture: How This Rugby Rivalry Has Lasted 59 Years

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
Why NZR's Ineos settlement may be the most important victory they'll enjoy this year

It really all depends of how much overseas players would be paid (by NZR) to play for the All Blacks. I’ve not heard a peep on this front from any author suggesting it’s a good idea.


If it’s nothing (a player gets his weekly paycheck from the club and thats it (which we know is definitely not the case in Ireland and France, or SA even I think?), then maybe it would retain more SR level players given that they’ll be getting the “AB” component (which is about where things stand, Burke for instance would have had to had his Sader contract upgraded to an AB one (think above Pero levels) to be on similar money.


I’d having to imagine if a player is getting paid to do nothing over the international windows though, they are going to want to get paid extra for appear for the ABs, so in this situation, it’s hard to see many players being retained, yes.


I’m pretty sure they flew to Japan and met in person.


I’ve heard/had these discussions numerous times. I don’t think theres anyway to judge the interest that would be retain in SR. For one, it might be a more entertaining league as a result, as the JRLO is compared to Europe, despite it obviously being a lesser standard.


If SRP is of a lesser standard and now able to use Japanese and American players to bolster teams, perhaps those markets more than make up for the downturn in NZ and Aus? Perhaps it gives NZR flexibility to create a more fit for purpose interdomestic competition, and interest actually increases? All you might need is a proper pathway from school to pro?


Razor asked NZR to keep an open mind. Did NZR answer any of these questions to themself?

24 Go to comments
J
JW 4 hours ago
Kyren Taumoefolau All Blacks stance splits opinions on eligibility

Yeah of course it can be, it manages a good commerical outcome when 100 million people are following it. I’m saying rugby is no where near even remotely close to getting the payoff you’re talking about, never mind the distinct lack of anyway to implement it.


So you’re going for the dirty approach. I’m not surprised, it’s the only way to easily implement it right now. I wouldn’t see the benefit to doing that myself. A draft, if purely feasible in it’s own right, doesn’t need to provide commercial benefit at all (if it works, that’s all it needs to do, as it no doubt did back in america’s heyday). But without the advantageous backing of sponsors and interest levels, if you pick the wrong method to implement it, like a dirty approach, you do potential harm to it’s acceptance.


The aspect’s of the approach you chose that I don’t like, is that the franchises are the ones spending the money of the U20’s only for there opposition to get first dibs. Personally, I would much prefer an investment into a proper pathway (which I can’t really see SR U20s being at all in anycase). I’m not exactly sure how the draft works in america, but I’m pretty sure it’s something like ‘anyone whishing to be pro has to sign for the draft’, and results in maybe 10 or 20% of those being drafted. The rest (that accumulative 80/90% year on year) do go back into club, pronvincial, or whatever they have there, and remain scouted and options to bring in on immediate notice for cover etc. You yes, you draw on everybody, but what is generating your interest in the drafties in the first plaec?


This is your missing peace. If some come through school and into the acadamies, which would be most, you’ve currently got three years of not seeing those players after they leave school. Those that miss and come in through club, maybe the second year theyre in the draft or whatever, aged 20/21, you’re going to have no clue how they’ve been playing. NPC is a high level, so any that are good enough to play that would already be drafted, but some late bloomers you might see come in NPC but then Sky’s not going to broadcast that anymore. So what’s generating this massive interest you’re talking about, and most importantly, how does it tie in with the other 7 clubs that will be drafting (and providing) players outside of NZ?


Is the next step to pump tens of millions into SRP U20s? That would be a good start for investment in the youth (to get onto international levels of pathway development) in the first place but are fans going to be interested to the same level as what happens in america? Baseball, as mentioned, has the minor leagues, if we use that model it hasn’t to be broad over the whole pacific, because you’re not having one draft right, they all have to play against each other. So here they get drafted young and sent out into a lower level thats more expansive that SR, is there interest in that? There would be for large parts, but how financially viable would it be. Twiggy tried to get a league started and NPC clubs joined. BOP and Taranaki want SR representation, do we have a mix of the biggest clubs and provinces/states make a couple of divisions? I think that is far more likely to fan interest and commerical capabilities than an U20 of the SR teams. Or ofc Uni fits a lot of options. I’ve not really read anything that has tried to nut out the feasability of a draft, it can certainly work if this spitballing is anything to go by, but I think first theres got to be a need for it far above just being a drafting level.

36 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Munster-ROG reunion a ‘love story’ but no return likely for La Rochelle boss Munster-ROG reunion a ‘love story’ but no return likely for La Rochelle boss
Search