The role models leading the way for postpartum rugby players
In previous years it’s been extremely rare to hear of women having children mid-rugby career and hanging up their studs for a period of time to prioritize a family.
There was and continues to be little information out there about returning to a contact sport after giving birth and so many questions: What are the different considerations for returning to fitness if you have a natural birth as opposed to a C-section? What’s it like taking contact for the first time after childbirth or a caesarean, how long will I be out for? How much fitness will I lose? Will someone else take my place while I’m away?
We speak to 2014 England World Cup winner Emma Croker and current championship player Annette Bevan who had their children ten years apart but went through a very similar process when returning to the field.
Both women speak of their own experience of having emergency C-sections and returning to the pitch, being viewed as role models and paving the way for future mums in the sport.
Croker is one of only a handful of women to give birth at the peak of their international career and return to the highest level of the game and is somewhat of a case study in the space with many players reaching out to ask her about the unknowns.
“Three months after having Lucy I went back to play for Richmond in a couple of third team matches,” said Croker. “I then played again for England at the European Championships out in Italy when Lucy was only five months old.
“I tried to plan my pregnancy around the Six Nations and the two World Cup campaigns- it’s a tricky process as it’s not something you can just click your fingers and become pregnant.
“Once I found out, I didn’t do any contact training until after I’d had her, but I still ran, cycled and did light weights to keep myself cardio fit as opposed to anything else.”
Croker describes what she found hardest about returning to the pitch.
“The barrier to returning was more mental for me rather than physical. I physically healed relatively quickly, and it was the thought of someone tackling you where you’d had your abdominals cut open that I was more worried about.
“Physically I treated it as coming back from an injury which you do all the time as a rugby player. I followed the doctor’s advice, took time to let my body recover, went on lots of walks with Lucy and then started doing really gentle jogs to increase my stamina as I hadn’t done much for a few months.
“I was quite ill with preeclampsia from seven months onwards and couldn’t do a lot, so it took quite a while to get my stamina back. I went with what my body felt like it could do.”
Croker is proud to be viewed as a role model and mentions mothers-to-be who have contacted her in the past for advice.
“I’ve had three or four players in the past couple of years and people on social media asking questions and for helpful hints on what I had done to get back and it’s nice that people feel able to contact me and ask those types of questions.
“When I found out I was having a C-section I completely panicked, thinking it was going to take much longer and how am I going to get back as there wasn’t that bank of people to ask.
“If you look for the medical information online it’s there but I think there needs to be more women role models having babies and coming back into sport in general.
“When I was playing it was: ‘finish your rugby, then think about a family’ with a lot of my friends I played with in the World Cup final having children after they retired and certainly, back then it wasn’t seen as an option.
“You’re out for two years during pregnancy and coming back from it and you think someone’s going to come through and take your spot, but I think women now think a bit differently about it.”
It’s obviously a decision which differs from person to person, but Croker reveals why having her daughter mid-career was a choice she is proud of.
“Being able to show women it’s possible to have a baby and have a successful rugby career alongside has hopefully inspired people and gives them the confidence that it’s something you can do.
“And it’s an amazing experience! Being able to win the World Cup and have my two-year-old daughter there with me and have the photos to look back on with her wearing the medal, just sharing that experience was a magical thing.”
The decision to have a baby mid-career is a personal choice but not one many international players make, hinted by the recent retirement of 27-year-old Ireland captain Ciara Griffin who said she is retiring to ‘focus on my life outside of rugby and begin a new chapter.”
But what about other players further down the game? What are their experiences like?
Switch to Annette Bevan who plays for Reading Abbey Ladies in Championship 1 South who recently set up her own Instagram page @postpartumrugbymum dedicated to documenting her own journey from childbirth back to the pitch.
“The account was a spur of the moment decision,” explains the 30-year-old. “I had an emergency C-section after three days of labour and could barely walk for a week and I remember saying to my husband, how am I ever going to get back on the rugby pitch, how am I going to get back to going to the gym or running? And he was the one who suggested documenting my journey so I could look back and see how far I’ve come as there’s nothing out there and it may help other people.
“I started the page and the response I got! I’ve had people message me such as expectant mothers wanting to return to rugby or American football or other contact sports all asking questions as there’s no guidance out there.
“I’m a young, healthy and fit woman who didn’t have many issues during pregnancy and people were like you’ll breeze through labour and you’ll be back in the gym the next day but that didn’t happen. I had a three-day labour which ended in an emergency C-section so all the careful research I had done beforehand around a vaginal birth suddenly all went out the window.
“Luckily my pelvic floor was relatively intact when I went for a women’s health physio check at six weeks postpartum. But Ted was quite a big baby so I had three centimetres of ab separation and my physio said I couldn’t do anything until the gap was closed, so from weeks six to 12 I was doing excruciatingly dull core restore abdominal exercises. Then at 12 weeks I was cleared to start a return to running programme.”
When did it occur to Bevan that she wanted to have a baby and return to the rugby pitch?
“I always wanted to return to the pitch and knew it wasn’t time to hang up my boots yet. I think I’ve still got a few years left but it was only when I was in my third trimester, that I thought about returning and time frames. That’s when I realised there are so little guidelines out there for returning to contact sport or any sport really.
“Even the guidance on returning to running is quite vague and when I spoke to other rugby mums such as Emma Croker, Davinia Catlin and Jade Knight, all of their advice and time frames were different.”
Both Bevan and Croker believe more needs to be done to spread awareness and education around returning from childbirth to all sports, not just rugby.
Bevan admits that without the expertise of her club teammate who happened to be pregnant at the same time and a women’s health physio, she would have been without a clue as to the best way to return.
“Without my friend’s advice I probably would have gone out and tried to run five kilometres or something stupid and from what I can see and what I’ve heard there’s a lot of women making these mistakes because they don’t have the education.
“I’ve had a few friends recently who have given birth and not necessarily wanting to return to sport but I’ve said to go and see a women’s health physio and get their pelvic health checked because it shouldn’t be normal when you cough or sneeze after having a baby that you wet yourself, but there’s a lot of women who accept that as normal.”
Then add breastfeeding into the mix and it’s another dimension of the unknown for many mothers.
“I really mucked up on my first game back,” concedes Bevan. “I fed Ted before we left the house then I got to the rugby club, did the warmup and played the match, by the end of the match I felt like I was going to explode!
“It’s trial and error, so the second time I went off and fed Ted at the end of the warmup just before the match and luckily I have a very accommodating coach and team who allow me five minutes to go and do that.
“We have introduced the odd formula bottle which has been a life saver which has allowed a bit of flexibility but we’re getting there and learning.”
Croker’s experience of breastfeeding was different.
“It was a bit tricky, I only did it for three months as I found it quite difficult, and I didn’t want to play rugby and breast feed at the same time,” said the former international.
“By the time I got back to playing I’d moved on to the bottle but it’s an extra thing you have to deal with, having your breast pumps and breast pads in your bag as well as everything else and then arranging times of feeding around your training- it’s just another thing you need to think of before you go off and play!”
With the career of a rugby player being a short window, it is woefully unfair that players especially at the elite level tend to wait until their playing days are over to start a family.
It’s seems particularly unjust that the likes of England men’s players Ellis Genge, Joe Marler, Ben Youngs, Sam Simmons and Henry Slade to name only a few, are able to start their families relatively young, continue to play for years at the highest level and have their children grow up watching them. Only one current Red Rose player Marlie Packer has a child and that puts it into rather harsh perspective.
Is the topic of pregnancy and childbirth as an elite athlete just one more biological truth that athletes need to accept like menstrual cycle symptoms or do National Governing Bodies and unions need to be better at setting out maternity policies for players or health departments better at providing guidelines on returning to sport after childbirth? Perhaps only when more rugby players decide to have children mid-career will we find out.
If you are a woman looking to return to running or rugby postpartum, here’s our Q&A with women’s health physio and pelvic health specialist Emma Brockwell.
What considerations do women have to make when returning from pregnancy and childbirth to a contact sport like rugby?
We need to consider returning to sport after women have had a baby just as we would any other sports injury. We need to consider that regardless of how women have given birth every woman’s body will have changed dramatically and very quickly. For example, their bodies will have undergone hormonal and postural changes, increased weight and muscles will have lengthened, such as the pelvic floor and abdominal wall.
These changes alone require rehabilitation. A woman needs to consider that this process takes time- time to heal, recover and strengthen and much longer than the traditionally considered six weeks recovery that for too many years has been considered the adequate amount to return to any sport.
This process especially when returning to high impact and contact ideally requires professional guidance. This ideally would include pelvic health physios, as well as fitness professionals who understand the perinatal body.
No woman should experience pain or pelvic floor dysfunction when returning to their sport and if they do, their symptoms need to be treated and managed effectively, grading back to their sport as and when their bodies are ready.
A return to sport is a gradual process, if muscles are overloaded and a return to sport happens too soon, women may be at risk of injury and if muscles are not loaded enough then they will not adapt to the requirements of the sport. Therefore, every woman regardless of how they birthed, regardless of their sporting ability requires a comprehensive, holistic assessment with a view to rehabilitate them as an individual.
What is your advice when it comes to returning to running and building up stamina and fitness postpartum?
Running is a high impact sport and to run effectively our bodies need to be strong internally and externally. After having a baby, women are more predisposed to pelvic floor dysfunction so it’s imperative that pelvic health is addressed. When returning to running consider building blocks and build slowly. Strengthening can start as early as day 0- commencing with pelvic floor exercises. Listen to your body in the early days with gentle frequent movement in the early 0-2 weeks. As you feel more comfortable in the proceeding weeks, gradually add gentle body weighted strengthening exercises like squats and lunges.
Walking is a great way to build stamina in the first six weeks. Always listen to your body and if you are symptom free (ie. no pain or pelvic floor dysfunction) after six weeks consider increasing low impact exercise like cycling and light weights. If you are symptom free and have not been guided by a pelvic health physiotherapist then consider gradually reintroducing a return to run at around 12 weeks using a walk-run program. Ideally, we recommend a pelvic health physiotherapy assessment for all women from six weeks onwards.
Comments on RugbyPass
This is the problem with conservative mindsets and phycology, and homogenous sports, everybody wants to be the same, use the i-win template. Athlete wise everyone has to have muscles and work at the gym to make themselves more likely to hold on that one tackle. Do those players even wonder if they are now more likely to be tackled by that player as a result of there “work”? Really though, too many questions, Jake. Is it better Jake? Yes, because you still have that rugby of ole that you talk about. Is it at the highest International level anymore? No, but you go to your club or checkout your representative side and still engage with that ‘beautiful game’. Could you also have a bit of that at the top if coaches encouraged there team to play and incentivized players like Damian McKenzie and Ange Capuozzo? Of course we could. Sadly Rugby doesn’t, or didn’t, really know what direction to go when professionalism came. Things like the state of northern pitches didn’t help. Over the last two or three decades I feel like I’ve been fortunate to have all that Jake wants. There was International quality Super Rugby to adore, then the next level below I could watch club mates, pulling 9 to 5s, take on the countries best in representative rugby. Rugby played with flair and not too much riding on the consequences. It was beautiful. That largely still exists today, but with the world of rugby not quite getting things right, the picture is now being painted in NZ that that level of rugby is not required in the “pathway” to Super Rugby or All Black rugby. You might wonder if NZR is right and the pathway shouldn’t include the ‘amateur’, but let me tell you, even though the NPC might be made up of people still having to pull 9-5s, we know these people still have dreams to get out of that, and aren’t likely to give them. They will be lost. That will put a real strain on the concept of whether “visceral thrill, derring-do and joyful abandon” type rugby will remain under the professional level here in NZ. I think at some point that can be eroded as well. If only wanting the best athlete’s at the top level wasn’t enough to lose that, shutting off the next group, or level, or rugby players from easy access to express and showcase themselves certainly will. That all comes back around to the same question of professionalism in rugby and whether it got things right, and rugby is better now. Maybe the answer is turning into a “no”?
32 Go to commentsWow, didn’t realise there was such apathy to URC in SA, or by Champions Cup teams. Just read Nick’s article on Crusaders, are Sharks a similar circumstance? I think SA rugby has been far more balanced than NZs, no?
2 Go to commentsBut here in Australia we were told Penney was another gun kiwi coach, for the Tahs…….and yet again it turned out the kiwi coach was completely useless. Another con job on Australian rugby. As was Robbie Deans, as was Dave Rennie. Both coaches dumped from NZ and promoted to Australia as our saviour. And the Tahs lap them up knowing they are second rate and knowing that under pressure when their short comings are exposed in Australia as well, that they will fall in below the largest most powerful province and choose second rate Tah players to save their jobs. As they do and exactly as Joe Schmidt will do. Gauranteed. Schmidt was dumped by NZ too. That’s why he went overseas. That why kiwi coaches take jobs in Australia, to try and prove they are not as bad as NZ thought they were. Then when they get found out they try and ingratiate themselves to NZ again by dragging Australian teams down with ridiculous selections and game plans. NZ rugby’s biggest problem is that it can’t yet transition from MCaw Cheatism. They just don’t know how to try and win on your merits. It is still always a contest to see how much cheating you can get away with. Without a cheating genius like McCaw, they are struggling. This I think is why my wise old mate in NZ thinks Robertson will struggle. The Crusaders are the nursery of McCaw Cheatism. Sean Fitzpatrick was probably the father of it. Robertson doesn’t know anything else but other countries have worked it out.
15 Go to commentsIt could be coincidental or prescient that the All Blacks most dominant period under Steve Hansen was when the Crusaders had their least successful period under Todd Blackadder and then the positions reversed when Razor took over the Crusaders.
15 Go to commentsDefinitely sound read everybodyexpects immediate results these days, I don't think any team would travel well at all having lost three of the most important game changers in the game,compiled with the massive injury list they are now carrying, good to see a different more in depth perspective of a coaches history.
3 Go to commentsSinckler is a really big loss for English rugby.
1 Go to commentsThanks Nick The loss of players to OS, injury and retirement is certainly not helping the Crusaders. Ditto the coach. IMO Penny is there to hold the fort and cop the flak until new players and a new coach come through,…and that's understood and accepted by Penny and the Crusaders hierarchy. I think though that what is happening with the Crusaders is an indicator of what is happening with the other NZ SRP teams…..and the other SRP teams for that matter. Not enough money. The money has come via the SR competition and it’s not there anymore. It's in France, Japan and England. Unless or until something is done to make SR more SELLABLE to the NZ/Australia Rugby market AND the world rugby market the $s to keep both the very best players and the next rung down won't be there. They will play away from NZ more and more. I think though that NZ will continue to produce the players and the coaches of sufficient strength for NZ to have the capacity to stay at the top. Whether they do stay at the top as an international team will depend upon whether the money flowing to SRP is somehow restored, or NZ teams play in the Japan comp, or NZ opts to pick from anywhere. As a follower of many sports I’d have to say that the organisation and promotion of Super Rugby has been for the last 20 years closest to the worst I’ve ever seen. This hasn't necessarily been caused by NZ, but it’s happened. Perhaps it can be fixed, perhaps not. The Crusaders are I think a symptom of this, not the cause
15 Go to commentsNo way. If you are trying to picture New Zealand rugby with an All Blacks mindset, there have been two factors instrumental to the decline of NZ rugby to date. Those are the horror that the Blues have become and, probably more so, the fixture that the Crusaders became. I don’t think it was healthy to have one team so dominant for so long, both for lack of proper representation of players from outside that environment and on the over reliance on players from within it. If you are another international side, like Ireland for example, sure. You can copy paste something succinct from one level to the next and experience a huge increase in standards, but ultimately you will not be maximizing it, which is what you need to perform to the level the ABs do. Added to that is the apathy that develops in the whole game as a result of one sides dominance. NZ, Super, and Championship rugby should all experience a boom as a result of things balancing out. That said, there is a lot of bad news happening in NZ rugby recently, and I’m not sure the game can be handled well enough here to postpone the always-there feeling of inevitable decline of rugby.
15 Go to commentsNo SA supporter miss Super Rugby - a product that is experiencing significant head wind in ANZ - the competition from rival codes are intense, match attendance figures are at a historical low and the negativity of commentators such as Kirwan and Wilson have accelerated the downward spiral in NZ. After the next RWC in 2027 sponsors will follow Qantas and start leaving in droves.
2 Go to commentsLike others, I am not seeing the connection between this edition of the Crusaders and the All Blacks future prospects under Razor. I think the analysis of the Crusaders attack recently is helpful because Razor and his coaching team used to be able to slot new guys in to their systems and see them succeed. Several of Razor’s coaches are still there so it would be surprising if the current attack and set piece has been overhauled to a great extent - but based on that analysis, it may have been. Whether it is too many new guys due to injuries or retirement or a failure of current Crusaders systems is the main question to be answered imo. It doesn’t seem relevant for the ABs.
15 Go to commentsharry potter is set in stone. he creates stability and finishes well. exactly what schmidt likes. he’s the ben smith of australian rugby. i think it could quite easily be potter toole and kellaway for the foreseeable future.
5 Go to commentsThis is short sighted from Clayton if you ask me, smacks of too much preseason planning and no adaptability. What if DMac is out for a must win match, are they still only going to bring their best first five and playmaker on late in the game? Trusting the game to someone who wasn’t even part of planning (they would have had Trask pinned in as Jacomb preseason). Perhaps if the Crusaders were better they would not have done this, but either way imo you take this opportunity to play a guy you might need starting in a final rather than having their 12th game getting comfortable coming off the bench.
1 Go to commentsThanks Brett.. At last a positive article on the potential of Wallaby candidates, great to read. Schmidt’s record as an international rugby coach speaks for itself, I’m somewhat confident he will turn the Wallaby’s fortunes around …. on the field. It will be up to others to steady the ship off the paddock. But is there a flaw in my optimism? We have known all along that Australia has the players to be very competitive with their international rivals. We know that because everyone keeps telling us. So why the poor results? A question that requires a definitive answer before the turn around can occur. Joe Schmidt signed on for 2 years, time to encompass the Lions tour of 2025. By all accounts he puts family first and that’s fair enough, but I would wager that his 2 year contract will be extended if the next 18 months or so shows the statement “Australia has the players” proves to be correct. The new coach does not have a lot of time to meld together an outfit that will be competitive in the Rugby Championship - it will be interesting to see what happens. It will be interesting to see what happens with Giteau law, the new Wallaby coach has already verbalised that he would to prefer to select from those who play their rugby in Australia. His first test in charge is in July just over 3 months away .. not a long time. I for one wish him well .. heaven knows Australia needs some positive vibes.
21 Go to commentsWhat a load of bollocks. The author has forgotten to mention the fact that the Crusaders have a huge injury toll with top world class players out. Not to mention the fact that they are obviously in a transition period. No this will not spark a slow death for NZ rugby, but it does mean there will be a new Super Rugby champion. Anyone who knows anything about NZ rugby knows that there is some serious talent here, it just isn’t all at the Crusaders.
15 Go to commentsI wouldn’t spend the time on Nawaqanitawase! No point in having him filling in a jersey when he’s committed to leave Union. Give the jersey to a young prospect who will be here in the future.
5 Go to commentsIt was a pleasure to watch those guys playing with such confidence. That trio can all be infuriating for different reasons and I can see why Jones might have decided against them. No way to justify leaving Ikitau out though. Jorgensen and him were both scheduled to return at the same time. Only one of them plays for Randwick and has a dad who is great mates with the national coach though.
53 Go to commentsBrayden Iose and Peter Lakai are very exciting Super Rugby players but are too short and too light to ever be a Test 8 vs South Africa, France, Ireland, and England, Lakai could potentially be a Test player at 7 if he is allowed to focus on 7 for Hurricanes.
7 Go to commentsPencils “Thomas du Toit” into possible 2027 Bok squad.
1 Go to commentsDon’t see why Harrison makes the bench. Jones can play at 10 if needed, and there is a good case for starting her there to begin with if testing combinations. That would leave room for Sing on the bench
1 Go to commentsWhat a load of old bull!
1 Go to comments