Northern | US

Will Genia: Why Pete Samu's Bledisloe omission is a 'huge head-scratcher'


Pete Samu. (Photo by Kelly Defina/Getty Images)
Comments
8 Comments

Eddie Jones swung the axe in the wake of a winless start to The Rugby Championship. The three victims surprised many, including former Wallaby Will Genia.

ADVERTISEMENT

Fullback Tom Wright started both of the Wallabies’ opening games but failed to make the Bledisloe Cup squad, as did Reece Hodge after a start against South Africa and Pete Samu after only a brief showing off the bench in that same game.

Samu’s omission took Genia by surprise due to the dynamic loose forward’s skillset being seen as a great addition to what has been an underperforming back row for the Wallabies.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

The unconvincing form of Australia’s back row, as well as an injury to Michael Hooper, has seen Rob Valetini be the only player named to start in both Tests to start the Wallabies’ 2023 campaign.

With selection very much up for grabs under new head coach Jones, the 16 minutes of action Samu received before facing the axe was barely a scratch on what the flanker deserved in Genia’s eyes.

“For me, it’s a huge head-scratcher why Pete Samu was left out of the squad,” Genia told the Aotearoa Rugby Pod. “He’s been such a consistently good player for the Wallabies over the last couple of years, granted he’s played a lot of his footy off the bench.

“The way Test rugby is going now, I don’t necessarily think you need a fetcher as much as you did in years gone by, I’d rather have size.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The thing about it is, you can slow the opposition’s ball down two ways, right? You’ve got David Pocock-style play, you can put pressure on the ball and slow it down or, you can slow it down by winning the collision with bigger bodies; making dominant tackles, flooding the ruck and slowing it that way as opposed to getting someone over the ball.

“I’d much rather go the route of having the bigger bodies, particularly in that back row and slowing the ball down that way.

“I think the All Blacks seem to have got their loose forward trio down and I think we’re still searching at the moment.”

Related

Genia went on to break down the available candidates for the Wallabies’ back row, saying while Michael Hooper had an underwhelming start to his international season, he’ll likely bounce back. Rob Valetini was seen as a success at No 8 and the return of Rob Leota could add the muscle that the No 6 jersey requires.

ADVERTISEMENT

Genia said for his starting openside flanker, he would in fact have opted for the dropped Pete Samu.

“Just to give him an opportunity,” Genia explained. “Again, someone who enjoys the physical battle, he’s dynamic in the ball carry as well, he creates a lot of opportunity with offloads in that space. I think we’ve got to get that balance right.”

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

8 Comments
Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

D
Drew 23 minutes ago
'The phoney war on the Greatest Rivalry tour is already gale-force in its intensity.'

The SA v Argentina game had more than 40min ball in play, so if thats the metric SA are doing pretty well. I take issue with all of the people who claim that Kiwi style “attacking rugby” is the only way forward and that refs must be harsh on slowing the ball down. Do you mean to suggest that the ABs don’t try to slow opposition ball down at ruck time? Of course they do. All teams do. Do you think South Africa really wants slow rucks? No we dont. We also know that quick ball creates openings. Its rugby 101. We just think that fast rucks is not the single and only important aspect of rugby and that if the ruck is already slow theres nothing wrong with taking a few extra seconds to setup for a good tactical kick or exit. There are also scrums, mauls, lineouts, tactical kicking, side steps and passing etc that are important. We also like to attack whether we have the ball or dont have the ball. Does that make us negative? I don’t think so. Our fast line speed and aggressive defence is a great weapon and a great thing to watch. It actually creates opportunities for high skill teams like NZ which makes for an intriguing contest. Its also funny that the people who call SA rugby negative and want us penalized for competing in the air, saying we are not really trying to catch it, and who want us to not get penalties from collapsed scrums, are the same people who complained that if we maul it over the line and its held up they should get a “get out of jail” dropout instead of having to go to another “boring” defensive scrum, the same people that complained that just because they were going backwards in the maul, if it collapsed and the ball doesn’t come out they should get the put in, the same people who complained that we shouldn’t be allowed to scrum from a free kick, and that failed attempted intercepts should be yellow cards. You are the people that are responsible for some of the most ridiculous laws in our game and the hours of TMO time wasted reviewing whether a knock on was “deliberate”, something that is impossible to impartially determine unless you can read minds. So before you complain about some aspect of the game in which you are inferior, rethink what you are wishing for, because it might just turn rugby union into rugby league. Honestly I think Dave Rennie would like that. The All Black style seems to be a lot like league.

185 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close