1
Ce qu'il faut savoir sur Angleterre v Argentine
L’Angleterre, finaliste en 2019, lance sa Coupe du Monde de Rugby 2023 avec un match difficile contre l’Argentine, confiante dans sa capacité à se qualifier pour la phase éliminatoire de la compétition.
ADVERTISEMENT
L’historique de la compétition favorise l’équipe de Steve Borthwick : l’Angleterre a remporté les trois précédentes rencontres en Coupe du Monde de Rugby, y compris une victoire convaincante de 39-10 au Japon il y a quatre ans.
Mais les Pumas ont pris le dessus lors de leur dernière confrontation, en novembre dernier, et ils ont connu une préparation encourageante pour cette RWC, contrairement à l’Angleterre.
HISTORIQUE
Le premier match entre une sélection anglaise et l’Argentine remonte à 1978. Le premier test, au cours duquel des joueurs des deux équipes ont été capés, a eu lieu trois ans plus tard en 1981.
Au cours des 42 années qui ont suivi, les deux équipes se sont affrontées 25 fois, dont trois fois en Coupe du Monde de Rugby. L’Angleterre en a remporté 19, l’Argentine en a gagné cinq, et le premier match s’est soldé par un match nul 19-19.
MATCHS MARQUANTS
En novembre 2006, les Pumas ont enregistré leur première victoire sur l’Angleterre en dehors du sol argentin, mettant fin par la même occasion au mandat du sélectionneur Andy Robinson.
En novembre dernier, ils ont ajouté un succès de plus à leur palmarès, avec une victoire spectaculaire et méritée de 30-29 à Twickenham, sous une pluie battante.
ADVERTISEMENT
Eddie Jones a été remplacé en tant qu’entraîneur de l’Angleterre après les rencontres internationales de novembre dernier, qui comprenaient également une défaite contre l’Afrique du Sud, un match nul contre la Nouvelle-Zélande et une victoire contre le Japon.
POINTS CLÉS
L’Angleterre aborde la Coupe du Monde de cette année avec seulement trois victoires en neuf matchs sous la direction de Steve Borthwick, dont la première défaite contre une nation émergente, 30-22 contre les Fidji.
Le sélectionneur a insisté sur le fait que son équipe avait les moyens de se montrer à la hauteur de la compétition. Une victoire au premier tour contre leurs plus grands rivaux de la Poule D pourrait faire taire certains critiques. La question est de savoir si sa confiance est justifiée.
LE DUEL
George Ford contre Santiago Carreras. Dans un match entre deux équipes qui semblent très équilibrées sur le papier, deux demis d’ouverture de Premiership, George Ford de Sale Sharks et Santiago Carreras de Gloucester Rugby, se feront face sur la plus grande scène du rugby. L’Argentin évolue tantôt en numéro 10, tantôt en numéro 15, en fonction de la composition de son équipe. S’il y a un avantage, il pourrait se situer ici. Le sélectionneur Michael Cheika a-t-il fait le bon choix ?
ADVERTISEMENT
NOTES SUR LES JOUEURS DE L’ÉQUIPE D’ARGENTINE
L’entraîneur de l’Argentine Michael Cheika a misé sur l’expérience pour ce tournoi : son effectif de 33 joueurs comprend Agustín Creevy, âgé de 38 ans, qui est le premier Puma à atteindre les cent sélections. Le talonneur et Nicolás Sánchez, qui ne figure pas dans les 23 pour le match d’ouverture, participent à leur quatrième Coupe du Monde de Rugby. Dix autres membres de l’effectif argentin en sont à leur troisième participation.
L’ARBITRE
Mathieu Raynal (France). Le seul représentant de la nation hôte sur le panel de 12 arbitres de la Coupe du Monde de Rugby 2023 était un espoir dans sa jeunesse, remportant le championnat junior français avec Perpignan en 1998.
COMPOSITIONS D’ÉQUIPES
ANGLETERRE : Freddie Steward ; Jonny May, Joe Marchant, Manu Tuilagi, Elliot Daly ; George Ford, Alex Mitchell ; Ellis Genge, Jamie George, Dan Cole, Maro Itoje, Ollie Chessum ; Courtney Lawes (capitaine), Tom Curry, Ben Earl
Remplaçants : Theo Dan, Joe Marler, Will Stuart, George Martin, Lewis Ludlam, Danny Care, Marcus Smith, Ollie Lawrence
ARGENTINE : Juan Cruz Mallia ; Emiliano Boffelli, Lucio Cinti, Santiago Chocobares, Mateo Carreras ; Santiago Carreras, Gonzalo Bertranou ; Thomas Gallo, Julian Montoya (capitaine), Francisco Gómez Kodela ; Matias Alemanno, Tomas Lavanini ; Pablo Matera, Marcos Kremer, Juan Martin Gonzalez
Remplaçants : Agustín Creevy, Joel Sclavi, Eduardo Bello, Guido Petti, Pedro Rubiolo, Rodrigo Bruni, Lautaro Bazan Velez, Matías Moroni
Comments on RugbyPass
Interesting article. I think the answer lies in a comment Kwagga Smith made during the World Cup. Asked whether it bothers him that the Bok team doesn’t get more credit he said: “We don’t play for people to respect us: we play for each other and we play for South Africa.” The Springbok team is a brotherhood - an incredibly tight unit, most of whom are good friends off the pitch as well. Not only do they not want to let South Africa down, but they fight like crazy not to let their teammates down. Not saying they don’t care about their club teammates, but I think the bond shared in the Boks is just much, much deeper. Tough to forge the same sort of bond at a club over a handful of years. That must translate into superior performances for country over club.
8 Go to commentsThere is very little creativity in the 9-10 axis for SA. 10 needs to be solid, put the work in and kick the points. the SA counter is almost always via the edge or a kick through for a winger. When was the last offensive backline score from SA against a top team? Perhaps the ultra physical nature of the SA teams means players they get to hit more stats in those games. Maybe the SA pleyers are perfectly suited to the SA system. In other Words they are not club players gathered to play SA Internationals. They are SA International players adapting to play club.
8 Go to commentsJust what you want your prop doing 😂
1 Go to commentsEveryone needs to have a bit of ball player in them Nick and second phase but forwards and backs are still different coz of where you stick your head most of the time. Pocock and tizzano were 12s right up to the edge of seniors. Pocock was 12 to quades 10 then pocock was at the force At 17 year’s old or so. Hamish Stewart was apparently was a junior 7. Don’t know when he switched but apparently he was crons 10 in the Oz 20s. A mistake too often made is playing a guy like taquele nairavuro at wing instead of as a power 8. On rugby tours we often had a spare 7 playing crash 12 coz the regular 12 stayed home. Often had a spare 7 playing on a wing too.
2 Go to commentsyikes - what a load of crap Gallan. Interesting until after your 1st paragraph, but then again not worth anyone’s time responding to such pointless analysis and of course your dumbass opinions.
8 Go to commentsOutside of their national camp, club teams seem to take a tighter stance on doping. Think that explains it really.
8 Go to commentsThanks Nick Ive always thought that there should be a few more innovative attempts at players moving from backs to forwards and vice versa. Samu was one, as was Jim Williams last century. Cole certainly could run like a back, as can Lonergan from the Brumbies. I think that it’s going to become hard again for hookers though as front rowers seem to be getting bigger and bigger, and the guys have to look after their spines as well as (in Australia) their achilles! I always thought that Folau should have been tried in the lineout…. I think the same for Vunavalu…if he lasts any longer. Movement between positions is much more common in League, mainly because the size requirements between backs and forwards are not as pronounced. Hookers and halfbacks interchanging and second rowers and centres as well. The great Cameron Smith was effectively a hybrid hooker/halfback, being able to play both positions…sometimes it seemed simultaneously! For now, it seems like McReith and before him Hooper are the standouts, though Cale could be anything. John Eals did a few “back” type things mind you, including running and kicking. As for Jones, I don't credit him as anything (in an Australian context) other than a speaker of a million throw away lines, with the occasional one being picked up! Sorry
2 Go to commentsHe's Big in Japan
2 Go to comments“England are set to lose some of their best ever players at the end of the season with the mass departure to France”… Really? Best ever? What a joke of an opening line. The england players leaving for France are… Sinckler, Ludlum, Tuilagi… that’s the list of players England are losing at the end of this season to France. All 3 are fringe players at best these days. Manu is the only one you could fathom debating being one of “their best ever players” and even that debate would be shut down pretty quickly. Pathetic excuse for journalism this. Not grounded in reality.
1 Go to commentsYep. The insanity of the decision of trying to outspend RL for outside backs just looks more and more stupid as time goes on and talented players either bully us into paying overs to keep them (Jorgensen) or simply leave as Uncle Nick comes calling (Nawaqanitawase).
20 Go to commentsInteresting that you pick Amatosero, John. I would agree with your choice. He could well be capped this year at some point. At only 21 years of age, he has a lot of experience at a high level from his time at Clermont. I’m surprised he did not remain there for longer, as last year he was really starting to move, with 14 games, six starts, well up from the previous year, 7 games, only 2 starts. Have liked what is doing with the Waratahs this year. Not an easy situation for any player there, with the poor results.
3 Go to commentsNed me old shinwah, it’s probably not a bad idea to learn how to spell the last names of great All Blacks wingers. (Otherwise we will demean our memories of Grant Bitty, Jonah Lima, Joe Rococo and Doug Howler.)
4 Go to commentsNo longer able to except the excuses offered up for Rob. The red jersey has lost it’s mana and become a joke. I do not wish Mr Penny any wrong but it is time to go. Do the right thing Rob and retire, PLEASE.
31 Go to commentsIt is a travesty that 8/12 teams play in the finals, and that 4 wins out of 14 might be enough to get you there, but every competition has this to some degree. If it was only the top 4 going through, then this season would have been over for 6 of the teams 4 weeks ago. Super Rugby is simply a feeder competition for the All Blacks and Wallabies. There are low stakes and no consequences because so few people care who wins Super Rugby. In football, winning the Champions League is the pinnacle for any player or fan. The fate of national teams in the world cup or Euros is a complete second fiddle to The Premier League, La Liga, Serie A, Ligue 1, Bundelsliga etc… Same with the NBA, NFL, NHL, MLB. Players and fans care deeply about their team winning NBA title, but don’t care at all about USA winning gold at the Olympics. Or more locally with Rugby League, the Hierarchy is probably NRL > State of Origin > International. For some maybe State of Origin is the top. Super Rugby is low consequence and low stakes because no one cares enough about the outcome. Players ultimately want to play for the ABs, not the Hurricanes or Blues. Casual fans aren’t talking about SR selections but everyone has an opinion on Sam Cane or Ian Foster. Super Rugby is a means to an end. The only context it has is how it effects who is selected for the ABs.
6 Go to commentsPlayoffs featuring 4 or 6 teams would mean the other teams playing meaningless games for longer and a further drop of interest in Australia. But yes a 12 team competition with 8 teams making finals is ridiculous.
6 Go to commentsJoe's picks will be more interesting than Razors. The dumping of Dave Rennie for Jones has to be one of the worst exec decisions of all time. Joe and Dave have similar styles and personalities, the players should like that. Predicting some success for Aus this year. Well more than last year!
3 Go to commentsHey Ben, Thanks for your opinion article. As a die hard rugby tragic and loyal supporter of the game can I say your article seems a touch negative so I would like to offer a slightly different spin on it. I am assuming that the sole purpose of the Super Rugby competition is not just to be a training camp for the International teams but an independent event and competition in its own right with sponsors, media companies and teams that need a financial return. Now, from this rugby fans perspective, I am enjoying the last few weeks of the competition and enjoying the fact that most teams can still make the play offs and nobody wants the wooden spoon. Most rugby followers would agree to it being a travesty if the Crusaders or the Waratahs now made it to the final but history tells us it is very unlikely with the importance of home ground advantage. Playing each team once and a four team final would give the competition integrity and a level playing field for all teams but I would be surprised if it could satisfy the financial demands of the TV rights. Maybe a six team finals series might be a possible compromise.
6 Go to commentsAll good choices John, even the Tah players ha ha. Others that might be worth a look would be ; Cale, Tom Lynagh, Uru, Keunzle, Anstee and maybe Rory Scott because we need a backup to McReight and he has improved a lot from last year and Tim Ryan.
3 Go to commentsWe only have 12 teams - and probably should only have 10. If we cut it down to 10, had a single round robin format, and only had semi-finals and a grand final, the final game would be on the first weekend of May. Meanwhile the AFL (similar to the NRL) runs until the last weekend of September and starts almost a full month after Super Rugby. At least the players would get plenty of rest!
6 Go to commentsAs article says re Japanese Final. Todd Blackadder up against his old mentor/ coach at Canterbury and the Crusaders , Robbie Deans. Both legends in this part of the world. Richie Mo’unga, ( another legend), playing brilliantly for Toddy’s team.Great to hear.
2 Go to comments