1
Classement : quels sont les plus grands stades du Top 14 ?
Par Idriss Chaplain
Face à une demande toujours plus grande en matière de billetterie, le Stade Toulousain semble se retrouver dans l’obligation d’agrandir Ernest-Wallon, comme le rapporte La Dépêche du Midi ce mercredi 10 avril.
ADVERTISEMENT
Si les Rouge et Noir ont pris l’habitude de délocaliser leurs grandes affiches au Stadium, stade de 33 150 places où évolue le Toulouse Football Club, ils commencent aussi à se sentir à l’étroit dans l’enceinte située aux Sept Deniers.
Le stade, qui compte moins de 19 000 places et serait plus adapté aux nouveaux besoins du club avec 5 000 sièges en plus, affiche guichets fermés à quasiment chaque rencontre.
Mais saviez-vous qu’Ernest-Wallon n’affiche que la cinquième capacité la plus élevée du Top 14 ? En d’autres termes, si le siège du Stade Toulousain augmente sa capacité de 5 000 places d’ici à 2028, il passera du Top 5 au Top 3 des capacités les plus élevées du Top 14.
Voici le classement des stades* du championnat, de la capacité la plus élevée à la plus faible. **
- Matmut Stadium Gerland (Lyon) (35 052 places)
- Stade Chaban Delmas (Bordeaux) (33 000 places)
- Stade Jean Bouin (Stade Français Paris) (19 607 places)
- Stade Marcel Michelin (Clermont) (19 357 places)
- Stade Ernest Wallon (Toulouse) (18 784 places)
- Paris La Défense Arena (Racing 92) (16 840 places)
- Stade Mayol (Toulon) (16 437 places)
- Stade Marcel Deflandre (La Rochelle) (16 000 places)
- GGL Stadium (Montpellier) (15 697 places)
- Stade du Hameau (Pau) (15 043 places)
- Stade Aimé Giral (Perpignan) (14 727 places)
- Stade Jean Dauger (Bayonne) (14 537 places)
- Stade Pierre Fabre (Castres) (12 300 places)
- Stade Charles Mathon (Oyonnax) (11 150 places)
Sans surprise, les deux anciens stades de football – et non des moindres – occupent les deux premières places.
Les enceintes qui accueillaient autrefois l’Olympique Lyonnais et les Girondins de Bordeaux, d’anciens champions de France de football, voient aujourd’hui évoluer le LOU et l’UBB.
Les enceintes modernes comme celles du Racing ou du Stade Français dénotent plus par leur architecture que par leur grande capacité.
ADVERTISEMENT
Quant aux stades comme Marcel-Michelin ou Jean-Dauger, rénové en 2021, ils disposent de tribunes proches de la pelouse et plus verticales qui génèrent une atmosphère unique. C’est notamment pour cela que Clermont et Bayonne sont souvent cités comme les meilleures ambiances du Top 14.
Si Ernest-Wallon, où évolue également le TO XIII, passait effectivement à 24 000 places d’ici 2028, comme le désire le président Didier Lacroix, il s’agirait du premier stade entièrement consacré au rugby à passer la barre des 20 000 sièges en France.
Ceci permettrait également au quintuple champion d’Europe de jouer dans un stade plus à l’échelle de ses ambitions, à une époque où l’engouement suscité par le Stade Toulousain s’étend à une grande partie de la région Occitanie.
ADVERTISEMENT
* On ne tient compte que des stades « domicile » des clubs engagés en Top 14 pour la saison 2023/24. Les stades de délocalisation, comme le Stadium de Toulouse ou encore Anoeta à San Sebastian n’entrent pas dans ce classement.
**Les capacités sont les capacités affichées sur le site officiel du Top 14.
Comments on RugbyPass
I like the offside rule, but this won't affect my team because all their kicks gets chased and that putts everyone on side. Lekker manne!
8 Go to comments20 minute Red Card is untenable. If you don’t punish the whole team, coaches won’t be sufficently incentivised to pick players with, or coach better tackle technique.
1 Go to commentsI can only think of One time ever a team has opted for a scrum from a free kick… Why the law change I wonder
8 Go to commentsYeah, its not going to work. But we see you World Rugby.
8 Go to commentsLove the reaction after last 2 W.Cups re rule changes…maybe good for more for more of a “ league” type running game( which I personally don’t like) but seems Rassie is definitely in ther heads…
8 Go to commentsGreat. More unwanted changes. Because these always work out well.
8 Go to commentsI’m sure South Africa’s opponents will rejoice at World Rugby minimising one of the Boks’ most potent weapons, but you just know Rassie is cooking something up with free-kicks that no-one else has thought of. Let them play checkers. Rassie’s playing chess. 😂
8 Go to commentsAfter a fairly simple Pac4, the BFs will find out a lot about themselves in September when they face the rampaging RedRoses at Twickenham in front of a record crowd. After that they will face them again in Canada in WXV1. They also have France to contend with. Will be interesting to see what Australia have to offer with Jo Yapp at the helm.
1 Go to commentsSuper Rugby Pacific has been better as a spectacle due to the emphasis on speeding the game up and I’d look at taking things a step further. Instead of giving teams 90 seconds to take a conversion, let’s bring that down 60 seconds. You could also look at allowing 45 seconds for a penalty goal. Maybe teams could get 20 seconds instead of 30 to form a scrum before the ref then starts the engagement process. However, this year the most pleasing change is the added competitiveness in the Trans Tasman matches. What does frustrate me is how the rugby media in Australasia allow the the whole ‘‘rugby is boring’’/’’rugby yawnion’’ narrative to take hold from from vindictive league types, the chairman of the ARL commission and News Limited Australia. Stick up for the game and shift the narrative!
22 Go to commentsIt’s not new for nines to be the key playmaker. For the Boks it has been common, with Fourie du Preez and Joost vd Westhuizen being obvious examples. It's also not that recent for nines to be box kicking, covering high balls in the back field, and tackling in the defensive line. For example, Faf de Klerk has been doing all of that for years.
6 Go to commentsThe hell with this constant regurgitation of what this pretty boy is doing. For all I care he might as well be doing a Jamie Oliver cooking course. Rugby is not a progression toward the NFL, which, given its prominence in your reporting, you appear to regard as the ultimate contact sport. It has virtually nothing to do with rugby, and forever may that remain the case. I know that if I don’t like it I don’t have to read it, but I’m sick of seeing this dishwater-dull nonsense.
2 Go to commentsGuys Eben did not mean it in a ugly way as it’s just a feeling he had. We Safas rate the All Blacks and no Bok player wants to play NZ in a Knockout game
148 Go to commentsHe basically described who Aaron Smith also considers the GOAT 9….the one & only Fourie du Preez😎
6 Go to commentsI’m hoping that the Reds can win their last 4 games with a couple of try bonus points. The pessimist in me wouldn't be surprised if the Drua and the Tahs knock the Reds over. The Reds may end up ruing the fact they were distinctly 2nd best against the Force and just so clunky against Moana Pasifica. The Brumbies should win all their remaining games with some bonus points giving them at least a top 2 finish as the leading Kiwi sides will take points off each other. How the Brumbies handle the fact that they will be expected to beat the Crusaders will fascinate me. You’d probably have to go back to 2001 for the last time the Brumbies would go into a game against the Crusaders odds on to win.
8 Go to commentsFree to air is the key to fan expansion. I attended last weeks game at Suncorp (Reds v Blues) and the total cost is prohibitive to most people that wish to attend. Two tickets $130, parking (event day gouging) $75, road tolls $20, dinner beforehand $130, plus some petrol and a beer inside the stadium and a single game starts to cost $300-400. Who can afford that week in week out, I’d love to go more but could only afford this one game to see the Blues, I’d have loved to have seen more NZ teams here but I’d need to stop eating or sell a kidney.
22 Go to commentsBrumbies are looking good and if they keep their home form up a final is not beyond the realms of possibility. They showed against the Hurricanes exactly how clinical they can be as they absorbed pressure in that contest while also scoring points and applying their own pressure. Reds are well placed as well but need to find consistency. They are building a longer term project with a young side and plenty of quality players. Been surprising to see the strength of Aussie sides this year after the debacle of the world cup. Have NZ sides gotten weaker? Have Aussie sides gotten stronger? A bit of both I would say. Whatever the case its good to see some actual competition between NZ and Aus sides again and thats exactly what the fans wanted and is probably driving better viewership numbers. All of this can only be healthy for Aus and Super Rugby and I hope the Brumbies go all the way.
8 Go to commentsDead time reductions are important as is ball in play time increases. Premiership leads the way in terms of ball in play and Northern refereeing standards around the breakdown has sped up the game significantly. Super Rugby is trying new things but its not leading the way in terms of making gains in reducing dead time and ball in play time. Northern administrators are also not against speeding up the game, on the contrary they want a faster game and have been trying things and are embracing increasing the speed of rugby. Super Rugby isnt providing a blueprint for anything, its just part the agreed upon blueprint that administrators across the world are moving to.
22 Go to commentsSome interesting stats that just proved what my first impression of NZ’s drive to speed up Rugby Union would amount to - fine margins here and there to cut a few seconds off the game and nothing else. To do more there would have to be wholesale changes to the game like doing away with scrums, lineouts and bringing back the ELV’s to have free kicks instead of penalties. Very little chance of it happening but, in the end, Ruby Union would be a 15-man version of Rugby League. There are reasons why Rugby Union is globally more popular that Rugby League and what NZ are also not considering is the unintended consequences of what they want to achieve. This will end up turning Rugby Union into a low value product that will not be acceptable to the paying public. If people really wanted a sped-up version of rugby, then why is Rugby Union globally way more popular than Rugby League? Rugby lovers all over the world are also not stupid and have seen through what NZ are trying to achieve here, selfishly to bring back their glory days of dominance over every other nation and compete with Rugby League that is dominant in Australasia. NH countries just don’t have the cattle, or the fantastic weather needed to play like NZ SR franchises do so good luck to whoever has to try and convince the NH to accept going back to the days of NZ dominance and agreeing to wreck the game in the process. I have serious doubts on the validity of the TV stats presented by GP. All they did was expand the broadcasting base by putting it on free to air, not even any indication of arresting the continued drop in viewership. Match day attendance goes hand in hand with broadcast ratings so if there was an increase in the one you should expect to see it with the other. However, the drop in match day attendance is very evident to the casual highlights package viewer. The only club who looks to be getting solid attendance is the Drua. I am calling it now that NZ’s quest to speed up the game will fail and so will the vote on the 20-minute red card.
22 Go to commentsAll of these media pundits always miss the obvious whenever they analyse what is ailing or assisting the game. Rugby always has contentious points for debate when picking apart individual games and finding fault with itself. All this focus and scrutiny on “speeding up the game”, “high ball in play” etc is all contextual to the fan. As a tv viewer, if you’re absorbed into a game, regardless if your team is playing or not, more ball in play time and action are all byproducts of the contest. A good contest subliminally affects your memory in selectively remembering all the good aspects. A poor contest and your brain has switched off because its a blowout and the result is never in doubt or it’s a real chore to watch and remain engaged throughout. The URC, Top 14 and English premiership are all competitions that feel like there’s real jeopardy each week. The dominance of Super rugby by NZ teams was unhealthy from a sustainable interest perspective. You can’t fault those teams or the players, but the lack of competitions won by SA and Australian teams long term was always going to test the faith and patience of die-hard and casual fans from those regions. SANZAR took their eye off the fans and fans voted with their feet and subscriptions. They were so concerned about expanding their product they forgot the golden rule about broadcasting live sport. Viewers tune in more when there’s an atmosphere and a true contest. You need to fill stadiums to create one, host unions need to do more to service ticket buyers, and this year proves the other, there’s more interest in Super rugby this year only because more games are competitive with less foregone conclusions. All these micro statistics bandied about, only interest the bean counters and trainspotters.
22 Go to commentsThe match experience still sucks at SR games, irrespective of the game being a little quicker. Rugby has to compete with so much in the modern world, if you’re going to get people to leave their houses and pay to watch a game in winter then the experience has to be worthwhile.
22 Go to comments