1
The 'clearly unfair' tie-break rule in new rugby variant has left fans absolutely baffled
The main rugby event of the calendar may be happening in Japan right now, but back in England a new form of the game has launched its inaugural event.
ADVERTISEMENT
RugbyX, the brainchild of former Fiji coach Ben Ryan, kicked off its first-ever tournament at London’s O2 Arena on Tuesday and has been met with plenty of controversy.
The new format of the game is played on a half-size pitch with 5 players on each team (which would’ve made RugbyV a more appropriate moniker, given the naming conventions of other rugby variants).
RugbyX has been dubbed a faster variant of the game, with quick lineouts and smaller scrums as well as only one way to score – tries (keeping with other forms of the code, tries are still worth 5-points, however).
Rule changes include banning kicks higher than 10-metres (the ball is equpped with a sensor) and setting a limit on the number of players that can get involved in rucks and mauls.
All in all, it’s a slightly more contracted game of sevens.
There is one particular change to the laws of the game that has left fans absolutely baffled, however – the tie breaker.
In the instance of a draw, play moves to a one-on-one situation with the winner decided by who scores three tries first.
ADVERTISEMENT
For fans watching the game, it became quickly obvious that every possession would result in a try – which meant that the player who started with the ball had an insurmountable advantage.
Tellingly, every sudden-death result fell the way of the team who had first possession.
Fans took to Twitter to vent at the absurd law.
I feel like first to 3 isn’t a fair way for 1 on 1, surely 3 each and then sudden death or something? #RugbyX
— RugbySeconds (@RugbySeconds) October 29, 2019
https://twitter.com/Rees13A/status/1189303320873263106
Except that the winner is 'first to 5 tries' and ENG went first.
So, whilst we were expecting USA to take their 5th attack, instead ENG were awarded the win.
So, my commiserations to #USARugby. That simply was not fair and #RugbyX has to rethink this.
— Adrian Papprill (@Papprilla) October 29, 2019
Women's #RugbyX final was decent enough and it was great that England won, but I don't get why both teams don't have an equal number of attempts in the 1v1. It's clearly unfair, especially in favouring the team that was behind for most of the game
— Jon Gibbon (@jonnypg_GB) October 29, 2019
Does anyone else feel the 1-1 doesn't make sense? Youd have to be MUCH faster than someone to be able to go from stand still to catching them up when they're coming at you at full speed #RugbyX
— Charlotte Sherman (@CharSherman111) October 29, 2019
Great that England won but that 1 on 1 bit first to 3 points is very unfair #RugbyX
— sam (@moorsy11) October 29, 2019
The overall consensus regarding RugbyX seemed to be that the variant showed potential in its inaugural tournament but there are also plenty of issues to iron out.
ADVERTISEMENT
The last matches of the day saw Argentina beat Ireland in the final of the men’s competition while the USA defeated England in the women’s final.
There are no further RugbyX competitions scheduled for the future, as yet.
Rassie Erasmus was typically candid in his latest press conference leading up to the Rugby World Cup final:
Comments on RugbyPass
late hit what late hit it wasn’t at all late and can clearly see he was committed before the tackle
1 Go to commentsChristian Lio -Willies 2 try perfomance was a standout. As was captain Scott Barrett. Up front was where the boys won it.They are a great team and players. Fantastic Crusades , you can keep going.
1 Go to commentsI don't know how the locals feel about that? I guess if you call yourselves the Worcester Wasps that might be appease. But really we need more teams in the Premiership in my view so they are not padding it out as they are at the moment. It might curtail so many players going abroad as well
4 Go to commentsNZ 😭😭😭is certainly rivaling England for best whingers cup!😭😭😭 !!!
24 Go to commentsYup. New Zealand won 3 out of 10 world cups played. SA 4 out of 8 attempts 30 Vs 50 per cent.🤔🤔
24 Go to commentsShould've done this years ago. Change Saturday kick off times to around 11am. Up and off and back home before 3pm, limit travel time too. Allows players to actually do something else with their Saturday that's family oriented or being rugby fans they could ‘watch’ pro rugby. Increases crowds etc. How can anyone that enjoys grassroots and pro rugby have to choose between the two on Saturdays?
9 Go to commentsI bet he inspired those supporters just as much.
1 Go to commentsBen Smith Springboks living rent free in his head 😊😂
67 Go to commentsGood to hear he would like to play the game at the highest level, I hadn’t been to sure how much of a motivator that was before now. Sadly he’s probably chosen the rugby club to go to. Try not to worry about all the input about how you should play rugby Joey and just try to emulate what you do on the league field and have fun. You’ll limit your game too much (well not really because he’s a standard athlete like SBW and he’ll still have enough) if you’re trying to make sure you can recycle the ball back etc. On the other hard, you can totally just try and recycle by looking to offload any and everywhere if you’re going to ground 😋
1 Go to commentsThis just proves that theres always a stat and a metric to use to justify your abilities and your success. Ben did it last week by creating an imaginary competition and now you did the same to counter his argument and espouse a new yardstick for success. Why not just use the current one and lets say the Boks have won 4 world cups making them the most successful world cup team. Outside of the world cup the All Blacks are the most successful team winning countless rugby championships and dominating the rankings with high win percentages. Over the last 4 years statistically the Irish are the best having the highest win rate and also having positive records against every tier 1 side. The most successful Northern team in the game has been England with a world cup title and the most six nations titles in history. The AB’s are the most dominant team in history with the highest win rate and 3 world cups. Lets not try to reinvent the wheel. Just be honest about the actual stats and what each team has been good at doing and that will be enough to define their level of success.
24 Go to commentsHow is 7’s played there? I’m surprised 10 or 11 man rugby hasn’t taken off. 7 just doesn’t fit the 15s dynamics (rules n field etc) but these other versions do.
9 Go to commentsPick Swinton at your peril A liability just like JWH from the Roosters Skelton ??? went missing at RWC
14 Go to commentsLike tennis, who have a ranking system, and I believe rugby too, just measure over each period preceding a world cup event who was the longest number one and that would be it. In tennis the number one player frequently is not the grand slam winner. I love and adore the All Blacks since the days of Ian Kirkpatrick when I was a kid in SA. And still do because they are the masters of running rugby and are gentleman on and off the field - in general. And in my opinion they have been the majority of the time the best rugby team in the world.
24 Go to commentsHaving overseas possessions in 2024 is absurd. These Frenchies should have to give the New Caledonians their freedom.
21 Go to commentsBell injured his foot didn’t he? Bring Tupou in he’ll deliver when it counts. Agree mostly but I would switch in the Reds number 8 Harry Wilson for Swinton and move Rob Valentini to 6 instead. Wilson is a clever player who reads the play, you can’t outmuscle the AB’s and Springboks, if you have any chance it’s by playing clever. Same goes for Paisami, he’s a little guy who doesn’t really trouble the likes of De Allende and Jordie Barrett. I’d rather play Carter Gordon at 12 and put Michael Lynagh’s boy at 10. That way you get a BMT type goalkicker at 10 and a playmaker at 12. Anyways, just my two cents as a Bok supporter.
14 Go to commentsThanks Brett, love your articles which are alway pertinent. It’s a difficult topic trying to have a panel adjudicating consistently penalties for red card issues. Many of the mitigating reasons raised are judged subjectively, hence the different outcomes. How to take away subjective opinions?
9 Go to commentsYes Sir! Surprising, just like Fraser would also have escaped sanction if he was a few inches lower, even if it was by accident that he missed! Has there really been talk about those sanctions or is this just sensational journalism? I stopped reading, so might have missed any notations.
9 Go to commentsAI is only as good as the information put in, the nuances of the sport, what you see out the corner of the eye, how you sum up in a split second the situation, yes the AI is a tool but will not help win games, more likely contribute to a loss, Rugby Players are not robots, all AI can do if offer a solution not the solution. AI will effect many sports, help train better golfers etc.
45 Go to commentsIt couldn’t have been Ryan Crotty. He wasn’t selected in either World Cup side - they chose Money Bill instead. And Money Bill only cared about himself, and that manager he had, not the team.
28 Go to commentsYawn 🥱 nobody would give a hoot about this new trophy. End of the day we just have to beat Ireland and NZ this year then they can finally shut up 🤐
24 Go to comments