Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The AI advantage: How the next two Rugby World Cups will be won

By Ben Smith
(Photos by Craig Mercer/MB Media/Getty Images/(Photo illustration by Jonathan Raa/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

One of the early experiments involving machine learning was done by the Icahn School of Medicine in New York to predict cancer in patients.

ADVERTISEMENT

Fed with the data of 700,000 patients, the model began spotting new patterns in the data that to the human eye, weren’t visible or didn’t make any sense. The AI model proved to be very good at finding patients with early-stage diseases. As a side, it also figured out warning signs of other disorders like schizophrenia.

The conundrum was researchers running the project had no idea how it was doing it, and still don’t.

As with the case with most AI models, the more data you have to train it, the better the results you get.

They are predictive machines, evolving towards superhuman-level intelligence. The applications are going to have wide use cases but in the realm of professional sport, obtaining the AI advantage is going to be a necessity over the next decade.

You don’t even need to explain the rules of the game. We’ve learnt that the AI models can learn the rules just by watching. Ingest years and years of game footage, it will understand the sport at a level greater than any human could.

You can start to imagine the impact this is going to have. And if you don’t have it, it will be used against you.

ADVERTISEMENT

An AI model trained on enough games of professional rugby will find every weakness or vulnerability in every single player on the field. Just like the cancer research team found, it will soon find patterns that are unrecognisable to the human eye.

If it watches every game that a professional player has played over their lifetime, it will take into account every single read in defence that they have made, what they do when presented with this picture or that picture, what players they struggle to tackle, what technique they use. Every single decision.

All of that information will be calculated in seconds and result in the AI planning and strategising on how to take advantage.

Armed with that information, it will come up with the perfect play to expose those players. Going further, it will come up with the perfect game plan to win against any combination of 23 players.

ADVERTISEMENT

If there is a match-up where one team theoretically loses 99 times out of 100, the model will be able to find the formula for the one outcome they can win and show them how to do it.

Upload every game possible from the team of an opposition coach and the AI will figure out every tactic they’ve ever used, every flaw in their plans, and predict what they will do next and the best way to play.

The job of the analyst is going to become rather easy, but the knowledge obtained at such speed will lead to incredible outcomes in game strategy and play.

Teams will have to continually come up with new plans, which will be driven by AI. Coaches who can’t or won’t evolve will get weeded out.

Even in the realm of managing your own team, the technology will be invaluable.

It will be able to detect the slightest changes in a player’s running style, perhaps indicating that player isn’t 100 per cent fit and has a problem.

If the model has all that player’s training data and has been trained on hours and hours of footage of that player’s movement, it will start predicting with scary accuracy whether an injury is likely to occur.

To be clear, the AI is never going to be able to win games of rugby, which are always decided by humans on the actual field. That is sport and won’t change.

The physical attributes still matter greatly, the skill, strength, size, power and the conditioning of the players. No AI can overcome a disproportionate mismatch in this area.

But between two teams that are evenly matched, the one that has superhuman level intelligence feeding them information about the battle at hand is going to improve their chances of victory greatly.

And between the top four nations right now, Ireland, France, South Africa, and New Zealand, where very little separates them, that is going to matter.

Professional sport is always after one per cent improvements, this is going to add far more than one per cent.

Right now it takes hundreds of millions of dollars to build these models. And they lie in the hands of very few, the tech giants who are building major data centres and feeding them as many data points as they can get their hands on.

But once model access is obtainable, professional sports teams will start building their own AI models for competitive use.

If one of the big four rugby nations were able to get a hold of one right now they would increase their chances of winning the 2027 Rugby World Cup greatly. By 2031 you would think this will be widespread.

Quite quickly the AI advantage is going to be a necessity as teams that adopt AI will gain an edge that is far superior to those that don’t.

That is the AI advantage.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

47 Comments
H
Harry 161 days ago

AI is only as good as the information put in, the nuances of the sport, what you see out the corner of the eye, how you sum up in a split second the situation, yes the AI is a tool but will not help win games, more likely contribute to a loss, Rugby Players are not robots, all AI can do if offer a solution not the solution. AI will effect many sports, help train better golfers etc.

B
Bull Shark 161 days ago

What’ll happen when the AI models of the future go back in time and try to destroy the AI models of the past standing in their way of certain victory?

F
Flankly 163 days ago

If rugby wants to remain interesting in the AI era then it will need to work on changing the rules.

AI will reduce the tactical advantage of smart game plans, will neutralize primary attacking weapons, and will move rugby from a being a game of inches to a game of millimetres. It will be about sheer athleticism and technique,about avoiding mistakes, and about referees. Many fans will find that boring.

The answer is to add creative degrees of freedom to the game. The 50-22 is an example. But we can have fun inventing others, like the right to add more players for X minutes per game, or the equivalent of the 2-point conversion in American football, the ability to call a 12-player scrum, etc. Not saying these are great ideas, but making the point that the more of these alternatives you allow, the less AI will be able to lock down high-probability strategies. This is not because AI does not have the compute power, but because it has more choices and has less data, or less-specific data.

That will take time and debate, but big, positive and immediate impact could be in the area of ref/TMO assistance. The technology is easily good enough today to detect forward passes, not-straight lineouts, offside at breakdown/scrum/lineout, obstruction, early/late tackles, and a lot of other things. WR should be ultra aggressive in doing this, as it will really help in an area in which the game is really struggling.

In the long run there needs to be substantial creativity applied to the rules. Without that AI (along with all of the pro innovations) will turn rugby into a bash fest.

R
Roelof 163 days ago

Interesting article with one glaring mistake. This sentence: “And between the top four nations right now, Ireland, France, South Africa, and New Zealand…” should read: And between the top four nations right now, South Africa, Ireland, New Zealand and France…”.

Get it right wistful thinkers, its not that hard.

J
Jonathan 164 days ago

Does the AI take into account refs? hahaha Seriously why not have two on field refs to avoid bias?

I
Isikeli 164 days ago

Watching the SA series no AI will motivate players like a Human can cause no matter your IP if you lack the hype to be super human or the level to go to the deep dark places you simply can’t win big games. France Ireland All Blacks and SA will surely get this AI but the end of the day it's luck and believe that matters

J
Jmann 164 days ago

Rather AI than the disastrous and disappointing human errors of the last RWC final.

B
Bull Shark 164 days ago

The AI will find the 1 scenario out of 100 to win. But then so will the other teams AI do the same (to prevent it). So then it will just be 99 losses and maybe a draw?

All of this is fine and dandy, but assumes that the players and coaches will be able to move flesh and bone around the training pitch and on game day to implement against whatever it was the AI scenarios predicted.

R
Rudi 164 days ago

I am not so sure it will have that a big effect in the next 10 years. To have a a.i giving you extra info doesn't mean you have a team that can implement the plan. It will take years for humans to adato be able to use the a.i's data

L
Luke 164 days ago

Don’t know who’s gonna win the next one but I’ll make a prediction and say that England will be knocked out at the pool stages.

Why’s that? Since 1995, however far Australia go in a World Cup, England do the same in the following World Cup, with 2015 being the only year to buck the trend.

Let me explain:
1995: Australia out in the knock out stages
1999: England out in the knock out stages. Australia win the World Cup
2003: England win the World Cup. Australia runners up
2007: England runners up. Australia out in the knock out stages
2011: England out in knock out stages. Australia out in knock out stages
2015: (the only to buck the trend) England out in pool stage. Australia runners up.
2019: England runners up. Australia out in knock out stages
2023: England out in knock out stages. Australia out in pool stages.
2027?

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 55 minutes ago
Boks and Pumas lead southern charge, but the north are ahead of the game

I don't think that's the case at all, particularly lock is a very bad example to make the point with anyway.


For eg; LSL would likely be the only local player (lock) in the side. There would be no Frost, or Williams, so no 'development'. If aussie had different selection policies the locks would all be overseas players, Skelton, the Arnolds, players I've seen from youth leveling up in Japan and qualifying for them instead, and no doubt there is a plethora of others that hit some good form in England or France, and who if included in a Wallaby environment at the time, might continue have played to their peak instead of turning into 'just' journeymen. I don't follow aus rugby enough for examples of this context but I reckon it would crowd out a position like lock (but is a good positive for the idea of selecting from offshore in general). Essentially there would be a lot of good players that left aussie shores upon making a name for themselves that would continue to remain in the national side, all but removing the need to blood young and unready local talent.


It of course would not be the same for every position, perhaps blindside would be the only other position where the amount of quality that is offshore compared to home would lead to the exclusion of local talent, and it wouldn't exclude rotating in the types of young player like Frost and Williams, but would Bell have become an international success so young? Other positions would be more where the gain of say including an experienced 10 or outside back would be dividends. But then you've also got to factor in whether the players those veterans would be trying to impart there global experience on would still be playing in Australia? Would Jorgensen be enough of a talent for a big French club to snap up? Or hungry for props like Bell and Tupou? Would they see how Ireland made use of Hansen and gun for Wright or one of the other very good Brumbie outsides? What's the point of having an experienced pro like Hodge in the squad when Wrights already overseas now in this new 'world' learning what there is of the French style himself?


The thing is your 'small' talent pool, suddenly becomes very 'large' selecting from offshore. The disconnect is it taking upto 3 times as long for people to flying back home, than say from Japan (or from EU to SA), along with the typical style mismatch's, not so much an ego thing. But with a lack of a DNA like SA, it might mean a lot more 'battles' between the respective styles and practices players are bringing back to camp. Can be only a positive in the right environment.


I think what they have now is the best of both worlds. There might be like 4 or 5 players they bring back, no disruption, no battle of the best way to play. You may have an important front rower like BPA, a world class player like Skelton, any number of veteran 10's, and a backline rock like Kerevi (not saying all these players would have been fit and ready to play international rugby, just imagine them at their peak for arguments sake). And that's what they have. It's what they'll likely go back to doing (if they get lucky with those generational players) for the next WC, even from now for the Lions. So I just don't think the 'picture' yuo outlined would be like reality, that's not to say I don't think there wouldn't be enough positives elsewhere to outweigh the negatives. Certainly going to another franchise for just 2 or 3 years before coming back would be a good development, but that idea is based on money that is not in the game at the moment.

250 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Report: Crusaders to sign former Wallabies playmaker Report: Crusaders to sign former Wallaby 10
Search