Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Reds vs Tahs: Tate McDermott sets the scene for rugby’s own ‘State of Origin’

By Finn Morton
(L-R) Waratahs captain Jake Gordon and Reds captain Tate McDermott at the 2024 Super Rugby Pacific Season Launch on February 14, 2024 in Auckland, New Zealand. (Photo by Dave Rowland/Getty Images for Rugby Australia)

Rugby League’s State of Origin is one of the most entertaining products in Australian sport. Three times every year, the best Australian players in the NRL go head-to-head in a gladiatorial war.

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s State against State and mate against mate. Australians hear that very phrase year after year, and it never fails to set the scene, raise goosebumps and ignite unwavering passion.

But that’s still months away. Instead, now is the time for rugby union fans to get excited for their own “State of Origin” grudge match between the Queensland Reds and NSW Waratahs.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Sporting similar shades of maroon and sky blue that are iconic in the NRL’s version, the Reds and the Tahs will be counting down the days until their Super Rugby Pacific season openers.

The Reds will take on the Tahs at ‘the cauldron’ that is Brisbane’s Suncorp Stadium. It’s hosted some iconic battles over the years, and a new chapter is about to be written.

“It’s our version of State of Origin. The oldest rivalry pretty much in Australian sport,” Reds captain Tate McDermott told reporters at the Super Rugby Pacific season launch on Wednesday.

“A lot of people don’t know that but it’s big. There’s a lot in it, there’s a lot on the line.

ADVERTISEMENT

“To have them in our home at Suncorp Stadium in a week and a half’s time, it’s brilliant.”

But the stage is even grander for the Queensland Reds as they prepare to usher in a new era this season. Former Brad Thron has gone and new boss Les Kiss is at the helm.

Related

Kiss, who formerly worked at London Irish in England, has already inspired the Reds to an impressive 32-7 win over the Waratahs in pre-season out in Roma.

For a team that’s looking to build on their eighth-place finish last season, although they were the only team to beat the Chiefs in the regular season, Kiss’ influence has “definitely” set them up for a better year in 2023.

ADVERTISEMENT

“There has been change,” McDermott said. “Thorny was there for six years and laid a brilliant foundation for us.

“We didn’t get the results with Thorny but there’s a lot of good stuff that it created.

“Les hasn’t come in and taken the broom through everything. He’s kept the good stuff which needed to remain and he’s built on top of that.

“It’s been really exciting to work under the vision he’s got for us, the game model we want to plan, and I guess the detail that’s gone into everything that he’s put in place.

“We’re miles ahead of where we were last year.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 4 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

15 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific
Search