Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Super Rugby Pacific Countdown: Every announced pre-season fixture

By Ned Lester
(Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images)

The countdown is on. Super Rugby Pacific is just a month away but fans need only wait until the opening days of February to catch their teams back in action.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 2024 pre-season promises more excitement than ever with fixtures between top Super Rugby clubs and the best teams of Japan and Europe to set the scene for a new era of Super Rugby Pacific talent.

As always, the year following a Rugby World Cup sees clubs’ succession planning put to the test, as stalwarts and legends depart and new faces attempt to live up to the standards of the jerseys left behind.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Names like Sam Whitelock, Michael Hooper, Aaron Smith and Richie Mo’unga will be among the notable absentees come February, while Sam Cane, Ardie Savea and Beauden Barrett are all in line to return to Super Rugby in 2025 after sabbaticals in Japan this year.

Which youngsters will get a crack at the next level in their absence? And can they make their mark and demand minutes moving forward?

These questions will begin to find answers once Super Rugby Pacific’s regular season kicks off on February 23. In the meantime, we shall get a sneak peak in the pre-season which begins on February 2.

Related

Here are each of the announced pre-season fixtures.

Friday, February 2

Highlanders vs Moana Pasifika, Queenstown Events Centre, 6pm NZT

ADVERTISEMENT

Saturday, February 3

Rebels vs. Waratahs, 2.30pm AEDT, TBC
Melbourne Reds vs. Force, 3.15pm AEST, Ballymore Stadium
Brumbies vs. Drua, 6.45pm AEDT, Viking Park, Canberra
Tokyo Suntory Sungoliath vs. Blues, TBD, Chichibunomiya Rugby Stadium

Sunday, February 4

Munster vs. Crusaders, TBD, Munster’s Páirc Uí Chaoimh
Saitama Panasonic Wild Knights vs. Chiefs, TBD, Kumagaya Rugby Stadium.

Friday, February 9

Highlanders vs Hurricanes, Queenstown

Saturday, February 10

Bristol Bears vs. Crusaders, TBD, Bristol
Kubota Spears Funabashi Tokyo-Bay v Chiefs, TBD, Chichibunomiya Rugby Stadium
Yokohama Canon Eagles v Blues, TBD, Nippatsu Mitsuzawa Stadium
Perth Reds vs. Waratahs, 7.40pm AEST, Gallas Fox Park, Roma
Force vs. Brumbies, 5pm WST, Revo Fitness Stadium,

Friday, February 16

ADVERTISEMENT

Crusaders vs. Highlanders, 6pm AEST, Methven Rugby Club
Rebels vs. Drua, 4.30pm AEDT, Gosch’s Paddock, Melbourne
Hurricanes vs. Moana Pasifika, NZCIS (Wellington)
Blues vs. Gallagher Chiefs, Takapuna Rugby Club, Onewa Domain, 4pm

Saturday, February 17

Waratahs vs. Warringah/Manly, 6.30pm AEDT, Pittwater Rugby Park, Sydney

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 9 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

24 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Makazole Mapimpi: 'My life is somewhere I never thought it would be.' Makazole Mapimpi: 'My life is somewhere I never thought it would be.'
Search