Play some rugby? You must be joking, the Springboks can't play any footy
It is not the Springboks’ job to play rugby that suits the All Blacks.
South Africa have no moral duty to the game or to sponsors and other stakeholders to produce a brand of football that’s easy on the eye. The job of coach Jacques Nienaber and company is to win, by whatever means rugby’s laws allows them.
We’ve adopted a rather superior tone here in New Zealand. Not only do we believe the All Blacks are better than everyone else, we assume the right to determine the right way to play as well.
We’ve harrumphed about the spectacle in the Springboks’ series win over the British & Irish Lions and condemned their box-kicking and time wasting in the 19-17 loss to New Zealand on Saturday night.
Well, let’s just rewind a couple of weeks. Are our memories so short that we don’t recall how bad South Africa were in their two losses to Australia?
Play some rugby? You must be joking. The Springboks can’t play any footy. That’s why the Wallabies pulled their pants down twice.
They tried to play and couldn’t and, after the humiliation of that, you can hardly criticise them for reverting to type against the All Blacks.
Besides, it’s an effective tactic – as Ireland showed against New Zealand in Dublin in 2018 – and in line with what rugby’s lawmakers have provided for us.
It’s not up to the Lions or Springboks or Ireland or whoever to play attractive rugby, it’s up to administrators to build a framework where there’s reward for that type of football.
More broadly, sport needs contests – not spectacles – and that’s why I enjoyed Saturday night so much.
Rory McIlroy might have been moved to tears by this year’s Ryder Cup, but I was bored to tears by it. Within a few holes of day one, you could see it wasn’t going to be a contest.
The NRL ruined their competition this year by tinkering with the laws. It wasn’t a question of whether Team A would beat Team B, just whether it was by 30, 40 or 50 points.
Think back to New Zealand’s three-test cricket tour to Australia a summer or two ago and what a crushing disappointment that was. The Black Caps were never in the contest and the series became an exercise in futility.
We need uncertainty about results, we need divergent styles and we need to see teams adapt to their circumstances.
We all know how effective the All Blacks are when the opposition lays down and plays dead. We know of their counter-attacking prowess and athleticism and we know how well they execute their skills at pace and under fatigue.
What we didn’t know was how they would cope when the game didn’t pan out that way. We didn’t know if they could adapt when Plans A and B weren’t working.
On Saturday, the All Blacks had to play in a way that wasn’t of their choosing and yet they won. For that, you’d have to say it was the finest performance of coach Ian Foster’s tenure.
The Springboks imposed their will on that match. They brought New Zealand down to their level and, rather than being scorned for that, they should be celebrated.
If the All Blacks want to play their brand of rugby this week, then it’s up to them to dictate that. That’s how rugby has always been.
You might want to play a certain way, but it’s in our best interests not to let you.
The Lions did that to the All Blacks in 2017, as did Ireland a year later. England have done it a time or two. That’s excellent coaching and execution of the game plan.
On a side note, it didn’t feel as if the Adidas ball helped a great deal last Saturday night.
Andrew Merhtens famously called a yellow iteration of it “a lemon’’ 20 years ago and not a lot’s changed.
Aerodynamically, the ball appears to do weird things in the air, whether you’re kicking from the hand or off the tee. As much as the pressure kick-chasers were able to exert in Townsville, some of the drops seemed to be a result of the ball itself.
Let’s just give the boys a Gilbert and let them get on with it.
I hope the Springboks play the same way this week and I’d like to think the All Black would again be able to adapt and prevail. The game might not prove the embodiment of rugby at its finest, but it should be a contest.
If we want better rugby, then it’s up to the lawmakers to give us a game where the attacking team can actually recycle the ball in contact and build a few phases.
As it is now, the box kick sadly remains your best bet.
Comments on RugbyPass
Thanks Brett, love your articles which are alway pertinent. It’s a difficult topic trying to have a panel adjudicating consistently penalties for red card issues. Many of the mitigating reasons raised are judged subjectively, hence the different outcomes. How to take away subjective opinions?
4 Go to commentsYes Sir! Surprising, just like Fraser would also have escaped sanction if he was a few inches lower, even if it was by accident that he missed! Has there really been talk about those sanctions or is this just sensational journalism? I stopped reading, so might have missed any notations.
4 Go to commentsAI is only as good as the information put in, the nuances of the sport, what you see out the corner of the eye, how you sum up in a split second the situation, yes the AI is a tool but will not help win games, more likely contribute to a loss, Rugby Players are not robots, all AI can do if offer a solution not the solution. AI will effect many sports, help train better golfers etc.
45 Go to commentsIt couldn’t have been Ryan Crotty. He wasn’t selected in either World Cup side - they chose Money Bill instead. And Money Bill only cared about himself, and that manager he had, not the team.
26 Go to commentsYawn 🥱 nobody would give a hoot about this new trophy. End of the day we just have to beat Ireland and NZ this year then they can finally shut up 🤐
13 Go to commentsTalking bout Ryan Crotty? Heard Crotty say in a interview once that SBW doesen't care about the team . He went on to say that whenever they lost a big game, SBW would be happy as if nothing happened, according to him someone who cares would look down.. Personally I think Crotty is in the wrong, not for feeling gutted but for expecting others 2 be like him… I have been a bad loser forever as it matters so much to me but good on you SBW for being able to see the bigger picture….
26 Go to commentsThis sounds like a WWE idea so Americans can also get excited about rugby, RUGBY NEEDS A INTERNATIONAL CALENDER .. The rugby Championship and Six Nations can be held at same time, top 3 of six nations and top 3 of Rugby championship (6 nations should include Georgia AND another qualifying country while Fiji, Japan and Samoa/Tonga qualifier should make out 6 Southern teams).. Scrap June internationals and year end tours. Have a Elite top six Cup and the Bottom 6 in a secondary comp….
13 Go to commentsThe rugby championship would be even stronger with Fiji in it… I know it doesen’t fit the long term plans of NZ or Aus but you are robbing a whole nation of being able to see their best players play for Fiji…. Every second player in NZ and AUS teams has Fijian surnames… shame on you!!! World rugby won’t step in either as France and England has now also joined in…. I guess where money is involved it will always be the poor countries missing out….
84 Go to commentsNo surprise there. How hard can it be to pick a ball off the ground and chuck it to a mate? 😂
2 Go to commentsSometimes people just like a moan mate!
4 Go to commentsexcellent idea ! rugby needs this 💪
13 Go to comments9 Brumbies! What a joke! The best performing team in Oz! Ditch Skelton for Swain or Neville. Ryan Lonergan ahead of McDermott any day! Best selection bolter is Toole … amazing player
12 Go to commentsI like this, but ultimately rugby already has enough trophies. Trying to make more games “consequential" might prove to be a fools errand, although this is a less bad idea than some others. Minor quibble with the title of the article; it isn’t very meaningful to say the boks are the unofficial world champions when it would be functionally impossible for the Raeburn trophy not to be held by the world champions. There’s a period of a few months every 4 years when there is no “unofficial” world champion, and the Raeburn trophy is held by the actual world champions.
13 Go to commentsIts a great idea but one that I dont think will have a lot of traction. It will depend on the prestige that they each hold but if you can do that it would be great. When Japan beat the Boks (my team) I was absolutely devestated but I wont deny the great game they played that day. We were outclassed and it was one of the best games of rugby I have seen. Using an idea like this you might just give the the underdog teams more of an opportunity to beat the big teams and I can absolutely see it being a brilliant display of rugby. They beat us because they planned for that game. It was a great moment for Japan. This way we can remove the 4 year wait and give teams something to aim for outside of World Cup years.
13 Go to commentsHi, Dave here. Happy to answer questions 🥰
13 Go to commentsDon’t think that headline is accurate. It’s great to see Aus doing better but I’m not sure they’ve shown much threat to the top of the table. They shouldn’t be inflating wins against the lousy Highlanders and Crusaders either.
3 Go to commentsSuch a shame Roigard and Aumua picked up long term injuries, probably the two form players in the comp. Also, pretty sure Clarke Dermody isn’t their coach. Got it half right though.
3 Go to commentsOh the Aussie media, they never learn. At least Andrew Kellaway is like “Woah, yeah it’s great, but settle down there guys” having endured years of the Aussie media, fans, and often their players getting ahead of themselves only to fall flat on their faces. Have the “We'll win the Bledisloe for sure this year!” headlines started yet? It’s simple to see what’s going on. The Aussie teams are settled, they didn't lose any of their major players overseas. The Crusaders and Chiefs lost key experienced All Blacks, and Razor in the Crusaders case, and clearly neither are anywhere near as strong as last year (The Canes and Blues would probably be 3rd & 4th if they were). The Highlanders are annually average, even more so post-Aaron Smith and a big squad clean out. The two teams at the top? The two nz sides with largely the same settled roster as last year, except Ardie Savea for the Canes. They’ve both got far better coaches now too. If the Aussies are going to win the title, this is the year the kiwi sides will be weakest, so they better take their chance.
3 Go to commentsThe World Cup has to be the gold standard, line in the sand. 113 teams compete for what is the opportunity to make the pool stages, and then the knockout games for the trophy. The concept is sound. This must have been the rationale when the World Cup was created, surely? But I’m all for Looking forward and finding new ways for the SH to dominate the NH into the future. The autumn series needs a change up. Let’s start by having the NH teams come south every odd year for the Autumn/Spring series games?
13 Go to commentsWhat’ll happen when the AI models of the future go back in time and try to destroy the AI models of the past standing in their way of certain victory?
45 Go to comments