How an NBA GM inspired the All Blacks lethal counter attack
Could legendary NBA coach Gregg Popovich have helped influence the All Blacks‘ counter strategy? What the San Antonio Spurs taught the All Blacks that revolutionised transition plays.
Australian journalist Bret Harris of The Guardian credits coach John Mitchell as the ‘godfather’ of the counter-attack philosophies employed by the All Blacks in the early 2000’s.
“As a basketballer, Mitchell understood the importance of transition, when the ball changes hands from one team to the other, which has become the foundation of the modern All Blacks’ style of play,” he wrote.
Whether Mitchell was indeed the first pioneer is unknown, but the philosophy has evolved as others like Wayne Smith built on the original concept.
As counter attack rose in production – around 45 percent of All Blacks tries are made from opposition ball – so did the importance of counter-attack systems. If nearly half of your tries come from opposition ball, why would you not have detailed plans around it and train for it?
Organised plans around counter-attack crystallised around Mitchell’s era, and the prominence of attacking from turnover ball became a central part of the All Blacks game that others failed to recognise the importance of.
The reasoning behind it is sound – transition plays are brief periods of instability within a match that offer up ‘weakness’ as teams try to become stable again on both sides of the ball. The ‘race to stability’ can yield big results for the winner, especially if you have the ball.
The transitions became referred to as ‘click’ plays because the attacking window is open and closed just like that, as fast as a ‘click’ and fortunes can be realised in the window.
https://giphy.com/gifs/mXrKnozhzBFzl5Hw4E
The counter-attacking system evolved as the All Blacks borrowed more concepts from basketball, and it was a Kiwi connection that helped Smith get time with the San Antonio Spurs.
New Zealand-born Sean Marks, the first Kiwi player to make it to the NBA and currently General Manager of the Brooklyn Nets, was an assistant coach to legendary Gregg Popovich at the San Antonio Spurs at the time.
After a 13-year NBA career, Marks landed an assistant coaching gig with the five-time NBA champions, where he became Pop’s protégé. Popovich valued Marks so highly he would not have let him leave if he had his way.
Whilst Marks was at the Spurs, he met with Smith and taught him the ‘Motion Offence’ that they ran in transition, which would become the inspiration for the All Blacks counter-attacking framework.
The Motion Offence is a flexible system of attack that utilises player movement, floor spacing and a set of skills (passing, cutting and setting screens). The system gives the players the freedom to utilise the skills within the framework to maintain rapid ball movement until a defensive mismatch or lack of coverage can be taken advantage of.
The system is fluid, meaning play develops in a natural flow and cannot be replicated more than once. Each rendition is a natural creation born out of the players’ honed instincts and abilities, as they read and react to what’s in front of them. It can only be as good as the players’ skills within it.
The hardest part of defending it is the play isn’t pre-determined. It is dictated by what the defence tells you to do, not by what you want to do. And according to those who swear by it, the defence will always give you an option.
It was perfectly suited for the All Blacks, allowing the players to do what they do best and utilise their skills.
Smith took away these principles and applied them to rugby in an attempt to create a ‘blur’ on counter-attack much the same way as the Spurs motion offence uses movement to create opportunities.
Retreating players would stretch to sidelines much the same way shooters would spot up in the corners, to ensure the All Blacks can use the full width of the field in the same way the Spurs use the floor.
They adapted the Spurs movement principles – no player is stationary for more than two seconds, and the ball is moved in under half a second. These were mirrored by the All Blacks 10-second rule – every player is working as hard as they can for the first 10 seconds, and doing the obvious quickly – which meant passing if you had a defender in front of you.
They would train it, so the players could learn visual cues from each other, becoming meshed as a greater sum of parts. The practice and repetition makes the system become second nature when the players know what each teammate likes to do and when they like to do it.
The most telling feature – it requires at least 14 men on their feet to execute, meaning forwards are involved as well. This creates excitement for all players involved, adding an enjoyment factor for forwards not necessarily present in other facets of the game.
This system has been in play for at least five years, possibly evolving into something more. The more experience retained in the All Blacks setup, the more dangerous it is. The system will always be as productive as the skills of the guys running it.
Michael Cheika wants more urgency in defence to shut it down.
Perhaps this is looking at the situation the wrong way. The All Blacks counter success isn’t down to the Wallabies defensive ability, it’s because their skill level in attack is so high – which is not going to get worse. Every side is vulnerable in transition to varying degrees, including the All Blacks themselves. They conceded an 80-metre try to Jack Maddocks in the first test in the same situation. Another try was also nearly created when Will Genia pounced on a loose ball own his five in a long break that ended when reserve hooker Tolu Latu threw a forward pass.
The answer might lie in attack, with better ball skills to limit the turnovers in the first place or implementing similar tactics when you have the same opportunities, which could level out the net effect of turnover ball.
Both teams will get a similar number of turnover opportunities – it’s what you do with it that counts and the Wallabies haven’t figured out how to best utilise theirs.
Comments on RugbyPass
Thanks Brett, love your articles which are alway pertinent. It’s a difficult topic trying to have a panel adjudicating consistently penalties for red card issues. Many of the mitigating reasons raised are judged subjectively, hence the different outcomes. How to take away subjective opinions?
4 Go to commentsYes Sir! Surprising, just like Fraser would also have escaped sanction if he was a few inches lower, even if it was by accident that he missed! Has there really been talk about those sanctions or is this just sensational journalism? I stopped reading, so might have missed any notations.
4 Go to commentsAI is only as good as the information put in, the nuances of the sport, what you see out the corner of the eye, how you sum up in a split second the situation, yes the AI is a tool but will not help win games, more likely contribute to a loss, Rugby Players are not robots, all AI can do if offer a solution not the solution. AI will effect many sports, help train better golfers etc.
45 Go to commentsIt couldn’t have been Ryan Crotty. He wasn’t selected in either World Cup side - they chose Money Bill instead. And Money Bill only cared about himself, and that manager he had, not the team.
26 Go to commentsYawn 🥱 nobody would give a hoot about this new trophy. End of the day we just have to beat Ireland and NZ this year then they can finally shut up 🤐
13 Go to commentsTalking bout Ryan Crotty? Heard Crotty say in a interview once that SBW doesen't care about the team . He went on to say that whenever they lost a big game, SBW would be happy as if nothing happened, according to him someone who cares would look down.. Personally I think Crotty is in the wrong, not for feeling gutted but for expecting others 2 be like him… I have been a bad loser forever as it matters so much to me but good on you SBW for being able to see the bigger picture….
26 Go to commentsThis sounds like a WWE idea so Americans can also get excited about rugby, RUGBY NEEDS A INTERNATIONAL CALENDER .. The rugby Championship and Six Nations can be held at same time, top 3 of six nations and top 3 of Rugby championship (6 nations should include Georgia AND another qualifying country while Fiji, Japan and Samoa/Tonga qualifier should make out 6 Southern teams).. Scrap June internationals and year end tours. Have a Elite top six Cup and the Bottom 6 in a secondary comp….
13 Go to commentsThe rugby championship would be even stronger with Fiji in it… I know it doesen’t fit the long term plans of NZ or Aus but you are robbing a whole nation of being able to see their best players play for Fiji…. Every second player in NZ and AUS teams has Fijian surnames… shame on you!!! World rugby won’t step in either as France and England has now also joined in…. I guess where money is involved it will always be the poor countries missing out….
84 Go to commentsNo surprise there. How hard can it be to pick a ball off the ground and chuck it to a mate? 😂
2 Go to commentsSometimes people just like a moan mate!
4 Go to commentsexcellent idea ! rugby needs this 💪
13 Go to comments9 Brumbies! What a joke! The best performing team in Oz! Ditch Skelton for Swain or Neville. Ryan Lonergan ahead of McDermott any day! Best selection bolter is Toole … amazing player
12 Go to commentsI like this, but ultimately rugby already has enough trophies. Trying to make more games “consequential" might prove to be a fools errand, although this is a less bad idea than some others. Minor quibble with the title of the article; it isn’t very meaningful to say the boks are the unofficial world champions when it would be functionally impossible for the Raeburn trophy not to be held by the world champions. There’s a period of a few months every 4 years when there is no “unofficial” world champion, and the Raeburn trophy is held by the actual world champions.
13 Go to commentsIts a great idea but one that I dont think will have a lot of traction. It will depend on the prestige that they each hold but if you can do that it would be great. When Japan beat the Boks (my team) I was absolutely devestated but I wont deny the great game they played that day. We were outclassed and it was one of the best games of rugby I have seen. Using an idea like this you might just give the the underdog teams more of an opportunity to beat the big teams and I can absolutely see it being a brilliant display of rugby. They beat us because they planned for that game. It was a great moment for Japan. This way we can remove the 4 year wait and give teams something to aim for outside of World Cup years.
13 Go to commentsHi, Dave here. Happy to answer questions 🥰
13 Go to commentsDon’t think that headline is accurate. It’s great to see Aus doing better but I’m not sure they’ve shown much threat to the top of the table. They shouldn’t be inflating wins against the lousy Highlanders and Crusaders either.
3 Go to commentsSuch a shame Roigard and Aumua picked up long term injuries, probably the two form players in the comp. Also, pretty sure Clarke Dermody isn’t their coach. Got it half right though.
3 Go to commentsOh the Aussie media, they never learn. At least Andrew Kellaway is like “Woah, yeah it’s great, but settle down there guys” having endured years of the Aussie media, fans, and often their players getting ahead of themselves only to fall flat on their faces. Have the “We'll win the Bledisloe for sure this year!” headlines started yet? It’s simple to see what’s going on. The Aussie teams are settled, they didn't lose any of their major players overseas. The Crusaders and Chiefs lost key experienced All Blacks, and Razor in the Crusaders case, and clearly neither are anywhere near as strong as last year (The Canes and Blues would probably be 3rd & 4th if they were). The Highlanders are annually average, even more so post-Aaron Smith and a big squad clean out. The two teams at the top? The two nz sides with largely the same settled roster as last year, except Ardie Savea for the Canes. They’ve both got far better coaches now too. If the Aussies are going to win the title, this is the year the kiwi sides will be weakest, so they better take their chance.
3 Go to commentsThe World Cup has to be the gold standard, line in the sand. 113 teams compete for what is the opportunity to make the pool stages, and then the knockout games for the trophy. The concept is sound. This must have been the rationale when the World Cup was created, surely? But I’m all for Looking forward and finding new ways for the SH to dominate the NH into the future. The autumn series needs a change up. Let’s start by having the NH teams come south every odd year for the Autumn/Spring series games?
13 Go to commentsWhat’ll happen when the AI models of the future go back in time and try to destroy the AI models of the past standing in their way of certain victory?
45 Go to comments