Four England takeaways, including case for a Smith/Farrell break up
Saturday was grim for England as the curtain fell on the Autumn Nations Series with a damaging thud, the comprehensive defeat to the Springboks leaving Eddie Jones with just a single win for four games this month and only five wins in a dozen outings for 2022. Here are four RugbyPass takeaways from the 13-27 defeat.
Bulletproof Eddie ain’t a good look
Eddie Jones was on his best behaviour when it came to explaining the latest damaging England setback, even politely apologising after he prematurely began answering one query before the question had been finished. It’s perhaps the difference that looking into the white of eyes makes as just 20 months ago he was calling out ‘media rat poison’ at a time when his briefings were confined to virtual engagement.
Thing is, he looked way too comfortable on Saturday night for a coach whose results have gone to pot and where one step forward seems to be too quickly followed by two or more steps back. The ship has sailed on the RFU potentially sacking him before France 2023, so he knows he is bulletproof for another ten months.
However, whatever the media currently thinks of his efforts (and we generally rate him very poorly as someone who hasn’t evolved his tactics despite all his palaver), he can’t be oblivious to the verdict of the Twickenham crowd. The RFU have raked in approximately £20million in ticket sales these last four weekends and for the fans to resoundingly boo at full-time was a powerful statement.
They won’t vote ever with their feet; the demand for tickets at Twickenham will always outstrip supply no matter how poor the results and no matter how much the RFU keep bumping up the prices. But supporters giving their team a filthy spray isn’t ever a good look and Jones’ England legacy is in danger of being left in tatters.
The mirage of change
A major frustration of the current England is that as much as Jones suggests his team is changing, the more it stubbornly stay generally the same. Nine of the same starters beaten up by the Springboks in Yokohama three years ago were in the starting XV here with the same brutal outcome unfolding, leaving you bemused as to where the actual progress has been these past 36 months.
Adding to the sameness was how the Saracens selection dominance has been re-established. It was last year when Jones sent the Vunipola brothers packing along with Jamie George, yet there were all included at the weekend, part of an eclipsed England pack that also included Maro Itoje.
Saracens may be setting an impressive pace at the top of the Gallagher Premiership but England having four of the starting pack hailing from the same club wasn’t a good way of trying to illustrate that things have evolved at Test level. They haven’t.
Just look at their set-piece issues, weaknesses from the 2019 World Cup final that again materialised even though the then South Africa scrum coach, Matt Proudfoot, is now on Jones’ staff. If that’s progress we just can’t see it.
Biting Smith/Farrell bullet
The big England debate this winter should be whether Jones bites the bullet and brings an end to his experiment of pairing Marcus Smith with Owen Farrell in a 10/12 axis. Injuries to Farrell last term meant it didn’t become a thing until the July Australian tour and the pair have now started another four matches together.
There were signs in game two versus Japan that they could complement each other as they shifted in and out of the two channels rather than rigidly staying put and it provided some encouraging variation, but it didn’t gel in the other three games.
Even the eight-minute comeback against the All Blacks can be put down to Smith abandoning the restricted England script and playing with the off-the-cuff vibrancy that he showcases across the road when playing for Harlequins.
Forget the captaincy, something that Farrell struggled with in recent weeks given his lack of rapport with referees. For the good of England, Jones needs to look at Smith and Farrell as competing for the same No10 jersey and free up the midfield selection.
Farrell with Tuilagi didn’t inspire at the moment as a centre partnership, so it is high time for a rethink now rather than walking into the World Cup blindly sticking by the Smith/Farrell 10/12 combo. The issue of the Farrell captaincy shouldn’t be a hurdle to breaking that duo up and trying something different.
Springboks then and now
Two England games versus the Springboks, two very different results twelve months apart. Jones made soundings post-game about the visitors’ domination of both possession and territory but the reality on checking the stats was that there was no major difference from a year ago when England won a thriller 27-26 (48 per cent possession and 47 per cent territory compared with 46 and 48 per cent respectively last November).
What really let England down when it came to numbers was their handling. There were just four bad passes and three knock-ons in their one-point win, but their 14-point defeat was pockmarked by 14 bad passes and seven knocks – a wounding lack of precision.
Fans will, of course, point to Saturday’s scrum where the penalty count was four-one against England but the tally was three-two in November 2021, so Jones’ front row conceding one additional penalty on this occasion was no major change-up, it’s just they coped better last time out against the Boks.
Comments on RugbyPass
Like others, I am not seeing the connection between this edition of the Crusaders and the All Blacks future prospects under Razor. I think the analysis of the Crusaders attack recently is helpful because Razor and his coaching team used to be able to slot new guys in to their systems and see them succeed. Several of Razor’s coaches are still there so it would be surprising if the current attack and set piece has been overhauled to a great extent - but based on that analysis, it may have been. Whether it is too many new guys due to injuries or retirement or a failure of current Crusaders systems is the main question to be answered imo. It doesn’t seem relevant for the ABs.
3 Go to commentsharry potter is set in stone. he creates stability and finishes well. exactly what schmidt likes. he’s the ben smith of australian rugby. i think it could quite easily be potter toole and kellaway for the foreseeable future.
5 Go to commentsThis is short sighted from Clayton if you ask me, smacks of too much preseason planning and no adaptability. What if DMac is out for a must win match, are they still only going to bring their best first five and playmaker on late in the game? Trusting the game to someone who wasn’t even part of planning (they would have had Trask pinned in as Jacomb preseason). Perhaps if the Crusaders were better they would not have done this, but either way imo you take this opportunity to play a guy you might need starting in a final rather than having their 12th game getting comfortable coming off the bench.
1 Go to commentsThanks Brett.. At last a positive article on the potential of Wallaby candidates, great to read. Schmidt’s record as an international rugby coach speaks for itself, I’m somewhat confident he will turn the Wallaby’s fortunes around …. on the field. It will be up to others to steady the ship off the paddock. But is there a flaw in my optimism? We have known all along that Australia has the players to be very competitive with their international rivals. We know that because everyone keeps telling us. So why the poor results? A question that requires a definitive answer before the turn around can occur. Joe Schmidt signed on for 2 years, time to encompass the Lions tour of 2025. By all accounts he puts family first and that’s fair enough, but I would wager that his 2 year contract will be extended if the next 18 months or so shows the statement “Australia has the players” proves to be correct. The new coach does not have a lot of time to meld together an outfit that will be competitive in the Rugby Championship - it will be interesting to see what happens. It will be interesting to see what happens with Giteau law, the new Wallaby coach has already verbalised that he would to prefer to select from those who play their rugby in Australia. His first test in charge is in July just over 3 months away .. not a long time. I for one wish him well .. heaven knows Australia needs some positive vibes.
21 Go to commentsWhat a load of bollocks. The author has forgotten to mention the fact that the Crusaders have a huge injury toll with top world class players out. Not to mention the fact that they are obviously in a transition period. No this will not spark a slow death for NZ rugby, but it does mean there will be a new Super Rugby champion. Anyone who knows anything about NZ rugby knows that there is some serious talent here, it just isn’t all at the Crusaders.
3 Go to commentsI wouldn’t spend the time on Nawaqanitawase! No point in having him filling in a jersey when he’s committed to leave Union. Give the jersey to a young prospect who will be here in the future.
5 Go to commentsIt was a pleasure to watch those guys playing with such confidence. That trio can all be infuriating for different reasons and I can see why Jones might have decided against them. No way to justify leaving Ikitau out though. Jorgensen and him were both scheduled to return at the same time. Only one of them plays for Randwick and has a dad who is great mates with the national coach though.
53 Go to commentsBrayden Iose and Peter Lakai are very exciting Super Rugby players but are too short and too light to ever be a Test 8 vs South Africa, France, Ireland, and England, Lakai could potentially be a Test player at 7 if he is allowed to focus on 7 for Hurricanes.
7 Go to commentsPencils “Thomas du Toit” into possible 2027 Bok squad.
1 Go to commentsDon’t see why Harrison makes the bench. Jones can play at 10 if needed, and there is a good case for starting her there to begin with if testing combinations. That would leave room for Sing on the bench
1 Go to commentsWhat a load of old bull!
1 Go to commentsOf the rugby I’ve born witness to in my lifetime - 1990 to date - I recognize great players throughout those years. But I have no doubt the game and the players are on average better today. So I doubt going back further is going to prove me wrong. The technical components of the game, set pieces, scrums, kicks, kicks at goal. And in general tactics employed are far more efficient, accurate and polished. Professional athletes that have invested countless hours on being accurate. There is one nation though that may be fairly competitive in any era - and that for me is the all blacks. And New Zealand players in general. NZ produces startling athletes who have fantastic ball skills. And then the odd phenomenon like Brooke. Lomu. Mcaw. Carter. Better than comparing players and teams across eras - I’ve often had this thought - that it would be very interesting to have a version of the game that is closer to its original form. What would the game look like today if the rules were rolled back. Not rules that promote safety obviously - but rules like: - a try being worth 1 point and conversion 2 points. Hence the term “try”. Earning a try at goals. Would we see more attacking play? - no lifting in the lineouts. - rucks and break down laws in general. They looked like wrestling matches in bygone eras. I wonder what a game applying 1995 rules would look like with modern players. It may be a daft exercise, but it would make for an interesting spectacle celebrating “purer” forms of the game that roll back the rules dramatically by a few versions. Would we come to learn that some of the rules/combinations of the rules we see today have actually made the game less attractive? I’d love to see an exhibition match like that.
29 Go to commentsIrish Rugby CEO be texting Andy Farrell “Andy, i found our next Kiwi Irishman”
5 Go to commentsI certainly don’t miss drinking beers at 8am in the morning watching rugby games being played in NZ.
1 Go to commentsThis looks like a damage limitation exercise for Wales, keeping back some of their more effective players for the last 20/25 minutes to try and counter England’s fresh legs so the Red Roses don’t rack up a big score.
1 Go to commentsVery unlikely the Bulls will beat Leinster in Dublin. It would be different in Pretoria.
1 Go to commentsI think it is a dangerous path to go down to ban a player for the same period that a player they injured takes to recover. Players would be afraid to tackle anyone. I once tackled my best friend at school in a practice match and sprained his ankle. I paid for it by having to play fly-half instead of full-back for the rest of that season’s fixtures.
5 Go to commentsJust such a genuine good bloke…and probably the best all round player in his generation. Good guys do come first sometimes and he handled the W.Cup loss with great attitude.
2 Go to commentsWord in France is that he’s on the radar of a few Top14 clubs.
5 Go to commentsGet blocking Travis, this guy has styles and he’s gonna make a swift impact…!
1 Go to comments