Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Currie Cup Final: Bulls player ratings vs Sharks

By Online Editors
Cornal Hendricks. (Photo by Lee Warren/Gallo Images/Getty Images)

The Bulls are Currie Cup champions after their hard-fought 26-19 extra-time win over the Sharks.

ADVERTISEMENT

The home side showed a lot of grit to fight their way back from being 9-19 down in the second half before levelling things and then securing the win in dramatic fashion towards the end of extra-time.

Check out the player ratings for the Bulls below:

15. David Kriel – 6/10
His impact on attack was limited. There was nothing too flashy, but he provided good cover at the back.

Video Spacer

Ryan Wilson and Jamie Roberts are joined on the panel this week by former Scotland international and Francophile Johnnie Beattie to preview the upcoming Six Nations squads. The lads discuss the Lions tour, Fabian Galthie and another Tourist XV pick.

Video Spacer

Ryan Wilson and Jamie Roberts are joined on the panel this week by former Scotland international and Francophile Johnnie Beattie to preview the upcoming Six Nations squads. The lads discuss the Lions tour, Fabian Galthie and another Tourist XV pick.

14. Kurt-Lee Arendse – 6
He did not get the space he wanted out wide, but he defended his channel well.

13. Marco Jansen van Vuren – 6
The Sharks’ attackers could not find a lot of space in his channel. He had a few good touches with ball in hand.

12. Cornal Hendricks – 8
The star of the show in the Bulls’ backline. He got plenty of metres with ball in hand and he was just a hard man to bring down.

11. Stravino Jacobs – 7
It was a nervy performance by the young man in the first half. However, he turned things around in the second half with some powerful runs which troubled the Sharks.

ADVERTISEMENT

10. Morné Steyn – 6
He could not really get his backline going on attack, but his kicking game was good, and he kept the scoreboard ticking over.

9. Ivan van Zyl – 6
It was a mixed bag from the scrumhalf, especially in the first half.

8. Duane Vermeulen – 6
He was not as influential with ball in hand as was in previous encounters. He is a good leader and that must have counted for something in the end.

7. Elrigh Louw – 7
His big frame gave the Sharks a few problems in the first half. He carried the ball powerfully.

ADVERTISEMENT

6. Marco van Staden – 5
He went missing for large periods during the match and he did not make his presence felt at the breakdowns like in he did in previous matches.

5. Ruan Nortje – 6
He was a key figure in the physical exchanges, especially in the mauls.

4. Sintu Manjezi – 7
The Sharks’ line-out was under constant pressure because of him and his line-out steal in the first half was a thing of beauty.

3. Trevor Nyakane – 5
A solid enough performance in the scrums, but it was just not enough from the Springbok.

2. Johan Grobbelaar – 7
His work rate around the park was high and he only got replaced in extra time. He was highly physical on defence and he made his presence felt at the breakdown.

1. Lizo Gqoboka – 6
He gave away an early scrum penalty. However, he just about managed to stand his ground after that.

Replacements:

16. Schalk Erasmus – N/A
On for Grobbelaar, ninth min extra time. Not enough time to be rated.

17. Jacques van Rooyen – 6
On for Gqoboka. He had a few good carries and was unmovable in the scrums.

18. Mornay Smith – 6
On for Nyakane, 60th. A solid figure in the scrums for the Bulls and he defended well.
6/10

19. Jan Uys – 6
On for Manjezi, 60th min. He was physical up front but did not have much of an impact in the line-outs in terms of disrupting the Sharks’ ball.

20. Arno Botha – 8
On for Louw, 54th min. He was the game-changer. He scored a try in the second half, which kickstarted a comeback by the hosts. He then scored the winner late in the second half of extra-time.

21. Embrose Papier – 7
On for van Zyl, 60 min. His service was crisp and controlled play from the breakdown.

22. Chris Smith – 5
On for Steyn, 75 min. Missed a kick which could have ended the game in regular time and then missed another in extra-time. He was a solid enough play with ball in hand.

23. Marnus Potgieter – N/A
Not used.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Bravelupus v Steelers | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

N
Nickers 1 hours ago
All Blacks sabbaticals ‘damage Super Rugby Pacific when it is fighting for survival’

Sabbaticals have helped keep NZ’s very best talent in the country on long term deals - this fact has been left out of this article. Much like the articles calling to allow overseas players to be selected, yet can only name one player currently not signed to NZR who would be selected for the ABs. And in the entire history of NZ players leaving to play overseas, literally only 4 or 5 have left in their prime as current ABs. (Piatau, Evans, Hayman, Mo’unga,?) Yes Carter got an injury while playing in France 16 years ago, but he also got a tournament ending injury at the 2011 World Cup while taking mid-week practice kicks at goal. Maybe Jordie gets a season-ending injury while playing in Ireland, maybe he gets one next week against the Brumbies. NZR have many shortcomings, but keeping the very best players in the country and/or available for ABs selection is not one of them. Likewise for workload management - players missing 2 games out of 14 is hardly a big deal in the grand scheme of things. Again let’s use some facts - did it stop the Crusaders winning SR so many times consecutively when during any given week they would be missing 2 of their best players? The whole idea of the sabbatical is to reward your best players who are willing to sign very long term deals with some time to do whatever they want. They are not handed out willy-nilly, and at nowhere near the levels that would somehow devalue Super Rugby. In this particular example JB is locked in with NZR for what will probably (hopefully) be the best years of his career, hard to imagine him not sticking around for a couple more after for a Lions tour and one more world cup. He has the potential to become the most capped AB of all time. A much better outcome than him leaving NZ for a minimum of 3 years at the age of 27, unlikely to ever play for the ABs again, which would be the likely alternative.

1 Go to comments
M
Mzilikazi 4 hours ago
How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle

Had hoped you might write an article on this game, Nick. It’s a good one. Things have not gone as smoothly for ROG since beating Leinster last year at the Aviva in the CC final. LAR had the Top 14 Final won till Raymond Rhule missed a simple tackle on the excellent Ntamack, and Toulouse reaped the rewards of just staying in the fight till the death. Then the disruption of the RWC this season. LAR have not handled that well, but they were not alone, and we saw Pau heading the Top 14 table at one stage early season. I would think one of the reasons for the poor showing would have to be that the younger players coming through, and the more mature amongst the group outside the top 25/30, are not as strong as would be hoped for. I note that Romain Sazy retired at the end of last season. He had been with LAR since 2010, and was thus one of their foundation players when they were promoted to Top 14. Records show he ended up with 336 games played with LAR. That is some experience, some rock in the team. He has been replaced for the most part by Ultan Dillane. At 30, Dillane is not young, but given the chances, he may be a fair enough replacement for Sazy. But that won’be for more than a few years. I honestly know little of the pathways into the LAR setup from within France. I did read somewhere a couple of years ago that on the way up to Top 14, the club very successfully picked up players from the academies of other French teams who were not offered places by those teams. These guys were often great signings…can’t find the article right now, so can’t name any….but the Tadgh Beirne type players. So all in all, it will be interesting to see where the replacements for all the older players come from. Only Lleyd’s and Rhule from SA currently, both backs. So maybe a few SA forwards ?? By contrast, Leinster have a pretty clear line of good players coming through in the majority of positions. Props maybe a weak spot ? And they are very fleet footed and shrewd in appointing very good coaches. Or maybe it is also true that very good coaches do very well in the Leinster setup. So, Nick, I would fully concurr that “On the evidence of Saturday’s semi-final between the two clubs, the rebuild in the Bay of Biscay is going to take longer than it is on the east coast of Ireland”

11 Go to comments
S
Sam T 10 hours ago
Jake White: Let me clear up some things

I remember towards the end of the original broadcasting deal for Super rugby with Newscorp that there was talk about the competition expanding to improve negotiations for more money - more content, more cash. Professional rugby was still in its infancy then and I held an opposing view that if Super rugby was a truly valuable competition then it should attract more broadcasters to bid for the rights, thereby increasing the value without needing to add more teams and games. Unfortunately since the game turned professional, the tension between club, talent and country has only grown further. I would argue we’re already at a point in time where the present is the future. The only international competitions that matter are 6N, RC and RWC. The inter-hemisphere tours are only developmental for those competitions. The games that increasingly matter more to fans, sponsors and broadcasters are between the clubs. Particularly for European fans, there are multiple competitions to follow your teams fortunes every week. SA is not Europe but competes in a single continental competition, so the travel component will always be an impediment. It was worse in the bloated days of Super rugby when teams traversed between four continents - Africa, America, Asia and Australia. The percentage of players who represent their country is less than 5% of the professional player base, so the sense of sacrifice isn’t as strong a motivation for the rest who are more focused on playing professional rugby and earning as much from their body as they can. Rugby like cricket created the conundrum it’s constantly fighting a losing battle with.

9 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Cardiff Rugby's band of brothers unite for the promise of brighter times ahead Cardiff Rugby's band of brothers unite for the promise of brighter times ahead
Search