Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

A bleak World Cup review for ‘the best ever Scotland team to take the field’

By PA
Finn Russell/ PA

Scotland suffered a group-stage exit at the Rugby World Cup after falling victim to a formidable pool featuring the two teams that began the tournament as the highest-ranked in the world.

ADVERTISEMENT

It represented a disappointing outcome for a side that arrived in France ranked fifth in the world and billed as “without doubt the best ever Scotland team to take the field” by highly-regarded former international John Jeffrey.

Here, the PA news agency looks back on a campaign in which Gregor Townsend’s side were unable to reach the heights of which they believed they were capable.

Video Spacer

Siya Kolisi talks about the Springboks facing off against the All Blacks in the World Cup Final

Video Spacer

Siya Kolisi talks about the Springboks facing off against the All Blacks in the World Cup Final

Results

In terms of results, Scotland lost the two games they were expected to lose and won the two they were expected to win.

In their first match in Marseille they failed to lay a glove on world champions South Africa, losing 18-3 and posting their lowest score since the first game of the previous World Cup.

They bounced back strongly with bonus-point wins over Tonga (45-17) and Romania (84-0) to keep their slender qualification hopes alive going into the last game against Ireland.

Needing to win with a bonus point or by denying the world’s top-ranked side a losing bonus in Paris, Scotland endured a chastening evening as the Irish raced into a 36-0 lead.

ADVERTISEMENT

Two tries in quick succession once the game was beyond them made the scoreline a more respectable 36-14, but the Scots’ inability to trouble either South Africa or Ireland meant they were on the plane home at the end of the pool stage for a second World Cup running.

While there was no disgrace in being eliminated from such a strong pool, Scotland felt they had failed to perform to their potential in the two key matches.

Selection

There were few surprises in the squad head coach Townsend named for the tournament, although the retirement of record try-scorer Stuart Hogg in June – after he had been named in the 41-man provisional group – threw something of a spanner in the works.

Stuart McInally was the most notable omission from the final 33-man squad named in August although the veteran hooker would later be called in after Dave Cherry withdrew due to injury following the first game.

ADVERTISEMENT

Townsend selected a familiar-looking side for South Africa and Ireland, with the only change to the XV between those two key matches the introduction of scrum-half Ali Price in place of Ben White.

The team remained relatively strong against Tonga, with only four changes from the Boks game, and the second stringers were given a run-out against Romania, meaning every player in the squad saw game-time except McInally, who withdrew himself through injury just over a week after being called in.

Related

Star performers

In a tournament where they misfired collectively in the two games that really mattered, few Scotland players returned home from France with their reputations enhanced.

Darcy Graham could at least take consolation from bagging five tries – one against Tonga and four against Romania – to climb to second on the national team’s all-time try-scoring list, although he would have traded those scores for a more notable impact against one of the two heavyweights.

Price – who scored tries against Romania and Ireland – would also be entitled to see the tournament as a nominal success on an individual level since he managed to regain the number nine jersey from White after losing it for the entirety of the Six Nations and the opening two games of the World Cup.

Related

Future

After arriving at the tournament amid a blaze of optimism, a sense of autumnal gloom has descended around the national team in the wake of their early exit.

The Scots – for whom Townsend remains contracted until 2026 – still have a good squad at their disposal, but 10 of the 33-man squad for France were in their 30s, while all of their much-vaunted first-choice back-line will be in their 30s by the time of the next World Cup in Australia.

The most pressing concern for Scotland in the post-tournament analysis is the perceived lack of talent emerging to take over from those nearing the end of their Test careers.

Ollie Smith, Rory Darge and Ewan Ashman were the three youngsters in the squad at 23, but there are very few options currently knocking on the door from the next age bracket down.

ADVERTISEMENT
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

6 Comments
M
MO 596 days ago

While I appreciate Townsend’s coaching that fact remains he is unable to build a Scottish team that can really threaten the big boys. Of course player resources are low, but I believe Townsend is trying to play a gameplan that doesnt fit his limited team

R
Red 596 days ago

Played rugby as it should be played - very entertaining

J
JD 596 days ago

And if they were forced to pick only players that were Scottish or had genuine Scottish backgrounds, they’d have finished up even worse. Don’t grumble too much.

N
Nickers 596 days ago

They had a poor campaign like teams do every year. Opening Springbok game was their best chance to cause an upset and get through, but they completely froze, and were tactically poor. They are a good enough side to score more than 18 points against South Africa but were so off on the night they didn’t even fire a shot.


Overwhelmed by an Ireland team superior in every facet of the game like everyone else has been over the past two years bar one game.


NH teams need to sharpen up their planning if they’re ever going to lift the cup again.

P
Poe 596 days ago

I'm not seeing anything bleak in Scottish rugby. Bad draw, went out like all the other teams. Two surviving. One winner. That's the nature of tournament rugby. If Scotland toured NZ, as in a proper tour, I think they might go well. Rwc is fun but one shouldn't base too much opinion on it.

B
Blanco 596 days ago

Why can’t anyone state the obvious?


What did for Scotland was World Rugby’s negligence to improve a draw and scheduling policy that had failed to work since 2003.

Why was this not fixed: because none of the traditioanl big four: NZ/SA/AUS/ENG were affected till this year.


Scotland performed well in the first half against SA with however, Darcy Graham butchering a chance that a top 4 team probably scores. Excellent play in the second half saw SA consolidate a win where the scoreline flatterred Scotland a little.

In a ‘Relative to their potential’ assessment Scotland fared no worse than SA. They built up nicely for the Irish Game, hoping possibly to catch the Irish half focused on a potential 50:50 Qtr with NZ. Scotland had to win by 8. It was a massive massive ask, and once they went behind they had to open it up a bit and Ireland put on a score. Again, not much they could do.


We most likely should have been talking about Scotland performing and improving to win their group and having a shot at one of the top four in the QTR (and maybe making a semi).


In short because of the draw, the 5th ranked team in the world had about a 10% chance of qualifying for the QTRs due to a draw/schedule system that could be sorted in 5 mins on the back of an envelope.


Disgraceful.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 30 minutes ago
Crusaders outlast fast starting Blues to reach another Super Rugby final

Yeah nar, but that’s kinda the thing, I don’t think the old approach was working either!


You might have it right though, leading up, in all rugby/competitions mean, to the last WC it did feel like there had been better discipline/less than the normal amount of cards. Well, at least a certain demographic of teams improved at least, but not so much NZ ones is my point.


I bet you also think going harsher would be the best way to go reducing head contact and the frequency of concussions?


I would hate to have your theory tested as it requires subjective thinking from the officials but..

AI Overview

In Super Rugby Pacific, a red card means the player is sent off for the rest of the match, but with a 20-minute red card, the team can replace the player after 20 minutes of playing with 14 men. If the foul play is deemed deliberate and with a high degree of danger, a full red card is issued, and the player cannot be replaced. A second yellow card also results in a 20-minute red card with a replacement allowed. 

is there to stop that from happening. The whole subjective thing is why we have 20min cards, and I worry that the same leniency that stopped them from red carding a player who ran 30 meters and still didn’t get his head low enough would stop them straight redn them too.


Back to the real topic though, right after that WC we saw those same angles getting red carded all over the show. So do some players actually have control over their actions enough to avoid head collisions (and didn’t gaf after the WC?), or was it pure luck or an imaginary period of good discipline?


So without a crystal ball to know the truth of it I think you’ll find it an immeasurably better product with 20m red cards, there just does not appear to be any appropriate amount of discipline added to the back end, the suspensions (likely controlled by WR), yet.

15 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Johann van Graan: The Bulls boy who would be England's king Johann van Graan: The Bulls boy who would be England's king
Search