The enigma of Finn Russell continues after his Cardiff spiral
Everyone knows what Scotland’s star flyhalf Finn Russell can do on his day. They also know what happens on his off ones.
The enigma that is Finn Russell showed up again in Cardiff as Scotland fell to Wales, led by Dan Biggar, who is almost the antithesis of his Scottish opposite.
Rarely does Biggar make colossal errors, he plays with poise and control that unfashionably guides his side to gritty wins. When a clutch kick is needed, Biggar is one of the best kickers in the world. His reliability in the big moments has been a defining aspect of his career.
Russell is the riverboat gambler with X-factor who either wows or massively disappoints, and it has been more of the latter in recent times despite his incredible showing in the third British & Irish Lions test.
It is seemingly the unsolvable equation that Scotland need to find an answer for in order to get over the hump. Sometimes you need your flyhalf to win the game, sometimes you need them to not lose it. This is what Russell has a problem with.
Since returning to the Scotland set-up following his falling out with Gregor Townsend in 2020, Russell has not found the type of magic that was produced in the win over England in 2018 and the stunning comeback in the 38-all draw at Twickenham in 2019.
To the contrary, Scotland have won at times despite the efforts of their flyhalf.
In the historic 11-6 win over England at Twickenham last year, with 58 seconds remaining Russell sat in the pocket and opted to attempt a drop goal under no advantage.
With a five-point lead, the kick would have sealed the match with a two-score lead. However, with the clock winding down, the safer bet would have been for the forwards to continue the pick and goes, drain the clock and then kick it out.
Scotland had the upper hand with possession, territory and the clock in their favour. There was no need to give England the ball back.
Under pressure, Russell bailed on his natural leg and attempted to make the drop goal from his left foot before being charged down by the oncoming England rush.
By sheer luck, Stuart Hogg was standing 10 metres further back to dive on the rebound to avoid disaster. Henry Slade was right there to either pick it up or hack it further downfield and snatch an improbable English win with a length of the field try the other way. There was not a purple jersey in sight to prevent disaster other than Hogg.
Scotland lost so many metres on that play that they kicked for territory on the next phase and gave England another possession to try and break Scottish hearts.
Scotland’s chances of catastrophically blowing that game in the last minute increased dramatically in those final moments with what would have gone down as one of the all-time braindead moments.
In the 25-24 loss to Wales at Murrayfield last year, Scotland needed just three points to win but played like they were after a try.
In the final 10 minutes, with possession and making headway into Wales’ half, Russell kicked a dinky grubber in behind, giving away possession on the first chance.
With four minutes remaining, Russell connected with Hogg on an inside break up the middle of the park where Scotland got to within 30 metres of the Welsh line.
A wild pass from a reserve prop cost Scotland 10 metres when none of the game drivers were there to take control and manage the situation.
After 11 phases from about 40 metres out, halfback Ali Price kicked to plug the corner. Wales wing Rees-Zammit covered the kick and hoofed it down inside Scotland’s 22, forcing them back and asking them to go 80 metres in the final two minutes.
On that last hurrah from deep, a wide pass from Russell was intercepted by Nick Tomkins, who almost scored a try to end the game if it weren’t for a fortuitous ruck penalty in Scotland’s favour on the five metre line.
The game management was non-existent when Scotland just need to maintain possession and try to draw a kickable penalty to win the game. They lost over 70 metres through inept decisions.
Against France last year, Russell was red-carded with possession for an elbow to the face of the tackler, when Scotland were five metres away from snatching the lead back.
It was a pivotal moment that again dramatically reduced his team’s chances of winning.
With time up on the clock, it was reserve flyhalf Adam Hastings who made the play to pull off an historic win.
After an incredible 19 phases of possession, Hastings finally got the ball and pulled the trigger with a long ball over the top to Duhan van der Merwe for the game-winning try in the 85th minute.
Would Scotland have managed 19 phases if Russell was on the field? Perhaps, perhaps not. Maybe an all or nothing grubber, chip kick or any other roll of dice may have been taken before the right opportunity presented itself.
All of this has to be revisited to understand that Russell’s latest showing in Cardiff is on trend with his form since returning to the Scottish national side. Since coming back more often than not, the bad has outweighed the good.
After taking ascendency in the arm wrestle to start the second half and earn a 17-14 lead, Russell fielded the restart and tried to transition to the left foot under pressure to make the clearance before a phase was made.
His wrong foot kick was charged and regathered by Wales, who then were hot on attack inside the 22. The pressure was put back on Scotland immediately after taking the lead.
After a period of kick tennis that forced a Welsh goal line drop out after a brilliant long kick by Russell, his first thought was to then try a long range drop goal directly from the restart from 44-metres out on the angle.
His attempt fell well short and gave Wales an easy reprieve after Scotland had done the hard work to get an attacking possession in their half from which to put the Welsh defence under pressure.
After that pivotal swing, Wales took control and worked their way down to almost score through Alex Cuthbert and settled for a penalty to tie the scores 17-all.
Too often Russell releases pressure for the opposition, instead of helping his side apply it. And at the worst of times, can put his own side under enormous pressure. In test rugby, that matters a lot.
The yellow card for the one-handed intercept attempt was one of those times that put his side under a heap of pressure. The rules are the rules and players know the risk. It was a calculated play and it didn’t come off. But was the reward worth it? Would Finn Russell have gone 95-metres in a foot race against Louis Rees-Zammit in cover?
The decision to make that attempt at that point in time after already coming up with so many momentum swings for Wales was indicative of the spiral he was on. Russell’s performance slowly degraded into a net negative impact over the second half despite a nice try assist in the first.
On the other side, Dan Biggar didn’t put his side under pressure unnecessarily. He didn’t squander quality possession in advantageous positions and let Scotland off the hook easily. He didn’t make execution errors like kicking restarts out on the full. He was patient, built Wales’ attack at the right moments and turned that into points.
Dan Biggar on one leg gave his side a net positive output and won the game while Russell was sitting in the sin bin when his side needed him most.
When Adam Hastings stepped into the role in 2020 he gave Scotland what Russell hasn’t. Stability, reliability, as well as clinical execution.
Hastings also made great plays in attack and his partnership with Hogg flourished as the two built a playmaking tandem that worked. Yet it came with far less downside.
Hastings could defer to Hogg and vice versa and neither seemed to step on each other’s toes as first receiving options. Both were critical in laying the foundation for the upset win over France at Murrayfield in 2020 with fantastic attacking play.
You can understand picking Russell on his ability alone and backing the mercurial talent to produce, but, by discarding Adam Hastings, Scotland don’t have another genuine option to go to.
If Russell is having one of ‘those’ days, they have no recovery option, one they could have used in Cardiff.
The third Lions test in South Africa was Russell’s best international showing in three years. Other than that, there hasn’t been much to write home about.
If Russell could master the skill of patience, he could become the best flyhalf in the world. In Cardiff it seemed he didn’t comprehend the concept and his lack of it was as deadly for Scotland as it was for the opposition.
You can’t build pressure in attack without patience. You can’t manage risk effectively without patience.
For Townsend, he’s gone all-in on Russell just when Hastings looked like the better option for the team. This faith in Russell has proven to be misguided so far at a time when Scotland have the team to make a real run at the title.
It’s hard enough to get to that pinnacle, they don’t need to overcome the play of their flyhalf too. He can’t be a net negative as a key figure in the team in such a pivotal position.
Scotland don’t need Finn Russell to be the reason why they win anymore, they just need him not to be the reason why they lose.
Comments on RugbyPass
Exciting place to be for the young fella. I expected he was French Polynesian when I saw him included in the France 6N squad (after seeing him in NZs), and therefor be strong grounds we might loose him to rugby down here. Good, in that he is good enough to warrant such a profile, and from a journalism’s fan interaction aspect, to finally get a back ground story on the fella. Hope he has settled into NZ OK and that at least one rugby country will fit with him to help his development, which, if so, he should surely continue for a few years, and then that he can experience France to it’s fullest with a bit more maturity and less reliance on family than you would have at his current age. A good 3 or 4 years before he would be ready for International duty if he wanted to wait. Of course he already sounds good enough to accept a call up, and to cap himself, in the more immediate future (he’d have to be very very good in the case of the ABs), and he’ll get a great taste of that being with the Canes who have a bunch who are just a few years further into their career and looking likely Internationals themselves.
11 Go to commentsI remember towards the end of the original broadcasting deal for Super rugby with Newscorp that there was talk about the competition expanding to improve negotiations for more money - more content, more cash. Professional rugby was still in its infancy then and I held an opposing view that if Super rugby was a truly valuable competition then it should attract more broadcasters to bid for the rights, thereby increasing the value without needing to add more teams and games. Unfortunately since the game turned professional, the tension between club, talent and country has only grown further. I would argue we’re already at a point in time where the present is the future. The only international competitions that matter are 6N, RC and RWC. The inter-hemisphere tours are only developmental for those competitions. The games that increasingly matter more to fans, sponsors and broadcasters are between the clubs. Particularly for European fans, there are multiple competitions to follow your teams fortunes every week. SA is not Europe but competes in a single continental competition, so the travel component will always be an impediment. It was worse in the bloated days of Super rugby when teams traversed between four continents - Africa, America, Asia and Australia. The percentage of players who represent their country is less than 5% of the professional player base, so the sense of sacrifice isn’t as strong a motivation for the rest who are more focused on playing professional rugby and earning as much from their body as they can. Rugby like cricket created the conundrum it’s constantly fighting a losing battle with.
3 Go to commentsOh wow… “But as La Rochelle proved in winning in Cape Town this season, a cross-continental away assignment need not spell the end of days.” La Rochelle actually proved quite the opposite. After traveling to Cape town and back they (back-to-back and current champs) got mercilessly thumped the next week. If travel is not the reason, why else would a full-strength powerhouse like La Rochelle get dumped on their @r$e$ one week later?
26 Go to commentsYou know he can land a winning conversion after the full time siren is up. (Even if it takes two attempts.)
5 Go to commentsA very insightful article from Jake. I would love to know how South African’s feel about their move to Europe. Do you prefer playing in Europe or want to go back to Super Rugby?
3 Go to commentspure fire
1 Go to commentsA very well thought out summary of all the relevant complications…agree with your ”refer the Cricket Test versus 20/20 comparison”. More also definitely doesn't necessarily mean better!
3 Go to commentsMust be something when you are only 19 y.o and both NZ and France want you. Btw he wasn’t the only new caledonian in french U20 as Robin Couly also lived in Noumea until 17. Hope he’s successful wherever he chooses to play.
11 Go to comments“Several key players in the Stade Rochelais squad are in their thirties” South Africans are going to hate the implications of that comment!
5 Go to commentsI know Leinster did a job on La Roche but shortly after HT Leinster were 30-13 ahead of them and at a similar time Toulouse were trailing Exeter. At 60 mins Leinster were 27 ahead but after 67 mins Toulouse were only 19 ahead before Exeter collapsed. That’s heavier scoring by Leinster against the Champions. I think people are looking at Toulouses total a little too much. I also think Northhampton are in with a real chance, albeit I’d put Leinster as favourites. If Leinster make the final I expect them to win by more than ten and with control.
5 Go to commentsHey Nick, your match analysis is decent but the top and tail not so much, a bit more random. For a start there’s a seismic difference in regenerating any club side over a test team. EJ pretty much had to urinate with the appendage he’d been given at test level whereas club success is impacted hugely by the budget. Look no further than Boudjellal’s Toulon project for a perfect example. The set ups at La Rochelle and Leinster are like chalk and cheese and you are correct that Leinster are ahead. Leinster are not just slightly ahead though, they are light years ahead on their plans, with the next gen champions cup team already blooded, seasoned and developing at speed from their time manning the fort in the URC while the cream play CC and tests. They have engineered a strong talent conveyor belt into their system, supported by private money funnelled into a couple of Leinster private schools. The really smart move from Leinster and the IRFU however is maximising the Irish Revenue tax breaks (tax relief on the best 10 years earnings refunded at retirement) to help keep all of their stars in Ireland and happy, while simultaneously funding marquee players consistently. And of course Barrett is the latest example. But in no way is he a “replacement for Henshaw”, he’s only there for one season!!! As for Rob Baxter, the best advice you can give him is to start lobbying Parliament and HMRC for a similar state subsidy, but don’t hold your breath… One thing Cullen has been very smart with is his coaching team. Very quickly he realised his need to supplement his skills, there was talk of him exiting after his first couple of years but he was extremely shrewd bringing in Lancaster and now Nienaber. That has worked superbly and added a layer that really has made a tangible difference. Apart from that you were bang on the money… 😉😂
5 Go to commentsNot sure exactly what went wrong for him at Glasgow but it’s pretty clear he ain’t Franco’s cup of tea. Suspect he would have been better served heading out of Scotland around the same time as Finn, Hoggy and Jonny!
1 Go to commentsBulls disrespected the Northampton supporters and the competition. Decide quickly, fully in or out.
26 Go to commentsI wonder if Parling was ever on England’s radar as a coach? Obviously Borthwick is a great lineout coach, but I do worry he might be taking on too much as both head coach and forwards coach.
1 Go to commentsJason Jenkins has one cap. When Etzebeth was his age he had over 80 caps. Experience matters. He will never amount to what Etzebeth has because he hasn’t been developed as an international player.
2 Go to commentsSays much about the player picking this gig over the easier and bigger rewards offered to him in Japan. Also says a lot about the state sanctioned tax benefits the Irish Revenue offers pro rugby players, with their ten highest earning years subject to an additional 40% tax relief and paid as a lump sum, in cash, at retirement. Certainly helps Leinster line up the financial ducks in a row to fund marquee signings like this!!! No other union anywhere in world rugby benefits from this kind of lucrative financial sponsorship from their government…
5 Go to commentsTrue Jordie could earn a lot more in Japan. But by choosing Leinster he’ll be playing with 1 of the best clubs in the world and can win a champions cup and URC…..
6 Go to commentsThanks for that Marshy, noticed you didn't say who is gonna win it. We know who ain't gonna win it - your Crusaders outfit. They've gone from having arguably the best Super Rugby first five ever, to having a clutch of rookies. Hurricanes all the way!
1 Go to commentsGeez you really have to question the NRLs ability to produce players of quality. Its pathetic. Dont the 25mil in Aus produce enough quality womens players. Sad.
1 Go to commentsBulls fan here, and agree 100% with the conclusion (and little else) of this article. SA sides should absolutely f-off from the champs cup until we get fair scheduling, equal support for travel arrangements and home semis. You know, like all the european teams get.
26 Go to comments