Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Six Nations statement: Freddie Steward red card 'not upheld'

England's Freddie Steward (right) after his collision with Ireland's Hugo Keenan (Photo by Ramsey Cardy/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

Freddie Steward has been exonerated following his red card sustained when playing for England in last Saturday’s Guinness Six Nations game away to Ireland. The full-back was sent off for a first-half collision with Hugo Keenan, his opposite number, and the decision taken by referee Jaco Peyper ignited a massive debate over whether the red card was merited or not.

ADVERTISEMENT

Four days later, it has now emerged that in the eyes of a Six Nations disciplinary hearing, the sending-off wasn’t warranted and Steward – whom they decided should only have been yellow-carded by Peyper – is now free to carry on playing without any suspension.

A Wednesday morning statement read: “England full-back Freddie Steward appeared before an independent disciplinary committee via video link on Tuesday evening having received a red card in the Guinness Six Nations match between Ireland and England on Saturday.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

“The red card was issued as a result of the referee concluding that the player had acted contrary to law 9.13 (a player must not tackle an opponent early, late or dangerously. Dangerous tackling includes, but is not limited to, tackling or attempting to tackle an opponent above the line of the shoulders even if the tackle starts below the line of the shoulders).

“The independent disciplinary committee consisting of Nigel Hampton (chair, New Zealand), Frank Hadden (Scotland) and John Langford (Australia) heard the case and considered all the available evidence, including multiple broadcast angles and submissions from the player and his representative.

Related

“After hearing the submissions, the disciplinary committee formally amended the law which was breached to law 9.11 (players must not do anything that is reckless or dangerous to others including leading with the elbow or forearm, or jumping into, or over, a tackler).

“The player denied that he had committed an act of foul play worthy of a red card as described in law 9.11. Having reviewed all the evidence, the committee decided that:

  • (i): head contact with an opposing player had occurred;
  • (ii): there had been an act of foul play in breach of law 9.11 in that the player had been reckless in his actions and in his upright positioning as he approached and came into highly dangerous contact with the other player;
  • (iii): there were sufficient mitigating factors including the late change in the dynamics and positioning of the opposing player which should have resulted in the issue of a yellow card rather than a red card.

“On that basis, the committee did not uphold the red card and the player is free to play again immediately. The committee acknowledged that match officials are required to make decisions under pressure and in the heat of a live match environment.”

ADVERTISEMENT

England were trailing 10-6 in the round five match in Dublin when Steward was sent off and while they closed to 10-9 during the second half, the numerical imbalance eventually told as Ireland went on to clinch the Grand Slam with their 29-16 win.

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

11 Comments
Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

U
Utiku Old Boy 3 hours ago
It'll take a brave individual to coach these All Blacks

This is an over-dramatization of the AB HC role IMO. I agree something has been “off” since before the 2019 RWC - even the last Lion’s series and it has not all been down to “improvements” by other teams (although that is definitely a reality). I think Rassie (again) shows how a strong coach manages both the locker room and the public perceptions by earning public and team trust through his strength of character, team innovations and improvement, decisiveness, fairness and owning mistakes. A strong NZ coach should have nothing to fear coming in to this environment. Much as I had hopes for Razor after Hanson II and Foster, I think Kirk’s decision is the right one as it was obvious to many of us, the “trajectory” was not there. Same mistakes, confusion under pressure, lack of progress and worst, capitulation. The key is not who will take on the role, but who is selected for the role. I think the leading candidates are JJ, Rennie, Mitchell and somewhere a role for Schmidt and/or Wayne Smith. Razor’s biggest “failure” was his hesitancy, persisting with failing selections, being positive at the cost of being real and the aura he gave off of not knowing where the “fixes” were. The job came too soon for him but he can learn from it and grow. Hopefully, the new guy is bold and strong and has a good team around him because the other big failure of Razor’s tenure was his coaching team was also not ready for the big leagues.

53 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT