Northern | US

Report: Paper reveal judge's findings in Etzebeth racism row


(Photo by Steve Haag/Gallo Images/Getty Images)
Comments
Comment

Former Judge Johann van der Westhuizen has found after conducting a thorough internal investigation that Springbok lock Eben Etzebeth is not guilty of either racism or assault. Etzebeth was accused of both after an incident last year at a Cape West Coast nightclub in Langebaan but has now been cleared of both charges.

ADVERTISEMENT

Although this decision was reached some time back SA Rugby was advised not to make it public at the time.

Van der Westhuizen has made the following findings in the case, which was revealed by the Rapport.

Video Spacer

Jacques Burger talks to Big Jim

Video Spacer

Jacques Burger talks to Big Jim

The report’s findings: He could find no grounds whatsoever to proceed with the charges; SA Rugby was advised to have a meeting with Etzebeth to discuss the consequences of these charges and how they could reflect on him; SA Rugby was also advised to have meetings with all Springboks to discuss this issue and how it could affect the public perception of them in the future.

Following these discussions, SA Rugby has now declared the matter closed and does not see any reason to continue with the investigation.

Due to the sensitive relationship between employer and employee, it was also heard that the sports governing body received legal advice at the time not to make the results of this investigation open to the public.

Etzebeth’s attorney, Andre Calitz, has said they welcomed the clearing of his client’s name.

“From the beginning, we’ve found it was unnecessary to change our case. Eben has not pleaded guilty at any stage to defamation or assault and has maintained his innocence at all times,” he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Calitz stated that it was just further proof of his innocence when he was informed of the findings of the investigation.

SA Rugby did not make the findings of the report known to the Etzebeth camp at the time but Van der Westhuizen confirmed that both the police and the South African Human Rights Commission (HRC) also investigated the matter.

However, HRC chairman Bongani Majola has stated that their Equality Court case is still pending until the hate speech charges against former broadcaster Jon Qwelane have been resolved. It is not clear when that will happen.

According to a report, the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) declared they haven’t decided on whether to prosecute Etzebeth yet.

ADVERTISEMENT

Eric Ntabazalila, the spokesperson for the NPA in the Western Cape has said that the prosecutor for the case hasn’t indicated to him why there has been no decision in the case as it’s now been 11 months since this incident occurred.

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

c
cnw 59 minutes ago
Rugby's Greatest Rivalry - The stats showcase South Africa's lethal adaptability

I think the issue is much more simple than this. As you know I did not buy into the narrative that Razor was an incompetant coach. I saw real development in terms of clinical structured play. For me the players were struggling with the regimentation needed to play Black Crusader rugby and it imploded in Wellington. London however was an unfortunate confluence of injuries to our key play makers - Roigard and BB - and another brain explosion by Taylor. The failure also to develop a 6-2 bench compounded an energy deficit in the second half. DR threw out the Black Crusader regimentation in favour of his Chiefs, Glasgow and Steelers formula. It has sparked an attacking prowess we have not seen for years - but it has come at the expense of the type of structured % play that Razor was building and brought with it a high error rate. When faced with a well oiled machine like the Boks, who have been fine tuning their systems for several years, the inevitable lack of coherency is exposed. And if we reflect on the losses to Boks on this tour, we can pinpoint “moments” in the game where the Boks systems overwhelmed the ABs. So, one of the key issues with the GVF analysis is that it underestimates the signficance of context of the games and thus overestimates the real difference between the coaches and the players.

Ps to put some stats around this, I have analysed the performance efficiency of the Boks and the ABs for all the NC and GR games. This is based on an aggregate of pass / carry and tackle per point. The AB average is 4.7 and never got higher than 5.8 while the Boks averaged at 6.7 and maxed out at 8.2 in Baltimore. This supports a strong inference that the Boks systems are just inherently more efficient at this time while the ABs are still coming to grips with their new systems. It is not coincidental that the Boks lost with their lowest performance ratio for the tour at 6.4.



...

555 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close