Northern | US

Nations Championship to return to the fore but Ireland and Scotland drag their heels - reports


Fijian players perform their war dance (Photo by Paul Kane/Getty Images)
Comments
Comment

After going quiet for the last month following significant fan backlash and opposition from a number of unions, it seems as if the Nations Championship is about to return to the agenda for the top 12 international unions.

ADVERTISEMENT

The proposed tournament, which would include the current Six Nations and The Rugby Championship nations, as well as Fiji and Japan, has been mooted for some time now, with World Rugby confirming its existence and their support for the tournament back in March.

The unions involved agreed in April to take time to consider the proposal from World Rugby, with the idea of relegation and the integrity of their pre-existing tournaments among the concerns that a number of unions had.

According to the Sydney Morning Herald, the latest proposal around the Nations Championship would see just the 10 current Tier 1 teams being involved in the inaugural tournament in 2022, before Fiji and Japan would be added to the southern hemisphere division of the competition in 2026.

The main opposition to the reform continues to come from Ireland and Scotland and that this 10-team format had been given by World Rugby as an alternative to its 12-team format last month, although World Rugby is still advocating for the latter of those two concepts.

The increased broadcast deals that the competition would offer have been championed by the SANZAAR nations, most notably Australia, Argentina and South Africa, as well as the Welsh union. As all of those nations deal with player retention issues, something which is exacerbated in a year ending with a World Cup, their need for a cash injection is significant.

ADVERTISEMENT

An alternative route for the Six Nations could be to look at investment from CVC, with the private equity firm having already invested in the Gallagher Premiership and in the advanced stages of doing similar with the Guinness PRO14.

The former Formula 1 owners have also been heavily linked with a takeover bid for the Six Nations, as they build an impressive portfolio of rugby investments.

With Premiership CEO Mark McCafferty set to stand down at the end of the season and take up a consultancy role with CVC, while maintaining his position on the professional game board, the scope for further negotiation between CVC and the RFU and other Six Nations unions certainly exists.

These new proposals will be discussed in Dublin next week when World Rugby hosts another set of meetings to discuss the future of the international game.

ADVERTISEMENT

WATCH: Financially-troubled Wasps have secured a new sponsorship deal

Video Spacer

Get the RugbyPass App 📱

Follow the biggest matches with live scores, line-ups, news and analysis, all in the RugbyPass App.

Download Here
On Apple IOS, Android, and Tablet.
ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

P
Phantom 35 minutes ago
Nations Championship: 'The data shows the north has finally caught up with the south'

Fact: the gap between the North and the South has narrowed considerably - that I get. However, determining that only selecting only Home grown players or playing in the home country is is the optimal strategy is a bit of a toss up and highly reliant on the economies of the home union. I do understand that England and to a lesser degree Ireland selects home based only. The top 14 is a massive threat to their domestic product. France would probably not be affected (the money is at home). Fiji, Argentina, Samoa, Italy and you could even argue Scotland have only benefitted from this. Their players either go overseas to learn at higher levels (Fiji, Samoa, Argentina) or players coming into their leagues to strengthen the home product and their National teams (Scotland, Italy, Japan).

South Africa used to limit its selection to the home based players, but the reality of a weak currency vs what players could earn oversees meant that you lost access to your best players at some stage of their careers, with very few exceptions. Kolbe left SA as he was considered too small for International Rugby (yes coaches/selectors view), but ironically in France he forced selectors to notice his endeavors and select him. He is only reaching 50 caps now despite being north of 30 - granted rotation and the odd injury also played a role, but for the most part it is having debuted or becoming a regular so late.



...

14 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close