Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Jacob Umaga learns fate after second red card in two Wasps games

By Liam Heagney
(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Wasps’ Jacob Umaga is set for another frustrating stint on the sidelines as he has received a four-week ban following last Saturday’s controversial red card versus Toulouse in his first game back following a three-game ban for a Boxing Day red card.

ADVERTISEMENT

The one-cap England out-half wasn’t meant to be available for selection to face the defending Heineken Champions Cup champions in Coventry last weekend and he had been banned for three games following his December 26 sending off versus London Irish in the Gallagher Premiership. 

However, he exercised the facility to get the final week of his suspension scratched by successfully completing the World Rugby tackle school initiative, freeing him to get chosen at full-back in last weekend’s round three European encounter. 

Video Spacer

Eddie Jones announces England’s new-generation 2022 Six Nations squad

Video Spacer

Eddie Jones announces England’s new-generation 2022 Six Nations squad

His return, though, was abruptly ended on 34 minutes when he was sent off by referee Chris Busby for tackling Toulouse scrum-half Martin Page-Relo in an allegedly dangerous way. That resulted in him having to attend yet another disciplinary hearing and on this occasion, the sanction was more severe than the punishment handed down last month.   

An EPCR statement read: The independent disciplinary committee comprising Roddy Dunlop QC (Scotland, chair), Tony Wheat (Ireland) and Olly Kohn (Wales) considered video imagery of the incident and heard evidence and submissions from Umaga, who accepted the red card decision, from Wasps team manager Dave Bassett, and from EPCR disciplinary officer Liam McTiernan.

“The committee upheld the red card decision, finding that Umaga had made contact with Page Relo’s head in a dangerous manner. It then determined that the offence was at the mid-range of World Rugby’s sanctions and selected six weeks as the appropriate entry point. As this was the player’s second appearance before a disciplinary committee for a similar offence this season, it was decided not to grant the full 50 per cent mitigation, and consequently, the committee reduced the sanction by two weeks before imposing a four-week suspension. Umaga is free to play on February 14.”

The disciplinary hearing outcome contrasts the feelings at the time of the incident, BT Sport pundits Lawrence Dallaglio and Austin Healey insisting that it was a yellow card offence at worst for Umaga. “That is excessive,” bemoaned Healey.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I don’t think it is a red card. At worst, he has received a red card here for poor tackle technique, not for the head-on-head. Well obviously for the head-on-head but that is a byproduct of hitting with the wrong shoulder. He hasn’t intentionally gone high on the head for me. It’s an accidental collision.”  

Dallaglio added: “The (Toulouse) player going into contact has jumped into Umaga. It is the wrong technique. He [Umaga] has got his head in the wrong position but in trying to free himself from Atkinson’s tackle, he [Page-Relo] has jumped into Umaga so there is mitigation and that is a yellow at best. The referee has got that wrong.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
Shaylen 1 hours ago
Jack Willis' Champions Cup masterclass proves English eligibility rules need a rethink

If France, Wales, England, Scotland and Ireland got together and all changed their eligibility laws in the same way SA has it would be absolutely bonkers. All players from all nations involved in Europe would be fair game as would their coaches. The investment in rugby would be supercharged as teams would rush to create dream teams. Transfer markets would be super charged, salary caps may change, private investment would grow as rich backers first buy clubs and then put money into their clubs in an effort to land the best players. The richest clubs and franchises would benefit most but money and players would move across borders at a steady flow. Suddenly countries like Wales and Scotland would have a much larger pool of players to select from who would be developed and improved in systems belonging to their rivals within superstar squads while their clubs receive large sums in the transfer market. The Six Nations would experience a big boost as the best players become available all the time. The Champions cup would become even more fiercely contested as the dream teams clash. Fan engagement would grow as fans would follow their favourite players creating interest in the game across the continent. Transfer markets and windows would become interesting events in themselves, speculation would drive it and rumours of big transfers and interest in players would spread. All of this is speculation and much of it would not eventuate straight away but just like in football the spread of players and talent would create these conditions over time. The transfer markets in European football is proof of this. Football had the same club vs country debate eons ago and favoured an open system. This has made it the largest game in the world with global interest and big money. Rugby needs to embrace this approach in the long run as well

12 Go to comments
J
Jon 7 hours ago
Waratahs 'counter-culture' limits Wallaby options for Joe Schmidt

This is a bit dramatic for me, I think the Rebels and Force cultures would be very strong, and if a player is chosen from either, you can be confident they are in a good head space and ready. Whether they quite have the technical or tactical foundations of the other two states is where one would way their risk of selection. I see no need for Schmidt to worry about that risk in this squad. The main reason I could see a predominance of players from Brumbies and Reds, is simple cohesion. What might the coaching group make of what’s lacking in the Tahs, and to a lesser extent Rebels and Force’s, franchise? Certainly sides (players) that are running irish plays like we saw from that lovely McDermott long ball with have a head start. I hope the players can continue it at International level. Really liked what I saw of Wright (don’t know player focus and just hadn’t seen a lot of him anyway) in that game, can see him being a glue in a Wallaby side too. A with the similar worry of selecting players like Ryan, I think it unfounded to worry so much about forward balance at the moment. Including both Wright and Skelton in the same lineout is not going to lose you games gainst Wales. Nor will any unknown weakenss Wales might find in Ryan be exploited to any great extent. It is the perfect time to introduce such a young player. What other shortcuts might Schmidt want to make now, just a year out from hosting BIL? When Gamble came on the scene I thought he had a Pocock ability to break game apart along with performing the role of a openside well. I would be very keen to drop Leota/Hooper for Gamble, and in your squad make up, include Uru as a lock. Did you forget to remove Vunivalu from your team? Would you have Meafou in your squad if you could?

114 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Ronan O'Gara on Leinster’s ‘comfort zone’ contributing to yet another final loss Ronan O'Gara hints at Leinster’s ‘comfort zone’ contributing to loss
Search