Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Ian Foster explains why Scott Barrett has been picked at No 6

(Photo by Phil Walter/Getty Images)

Crusaders lock Scott Barrett has been named at No 6 for the All Blacks for the first time since the 2019 semi-final defeat to England as they prepare to face Ireland in the first test.

ADVERTISEMENT

The All Blacks options at blindside were rather thin in the squad, with one specialist at the position in Akira Ioane and versatile options like Pita Gus Sowakula and Tupou Vaa’i who cover another back row position.

The selection of Barrett was a bold move by Foster which will bolster the line out to combat a handful of tall Irish targets like Caelen Doris and Jack Conan in the loose forwards.

Video Spacer

Maori All Blacks post-match press conference

Video Spacer

Maori All Blacks post-match press conference

Defending his selection, Foster said that he knows Barrett can play there and is bringing some of his best form into this test series after a successful Super Rugby Pacific campaign with the Crusaders.

“[It’s the] first time he’s started for us there, but he’s filled in a couple of times there,” Foster said.

“He’s also played for the Crusaders there. We know that he can do it.

“He’s one of the form players in Super Rugby in the last four to six weeks. He’s on top of his game.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Barrett’s stint at No 6 against England in the fateful semi-final didn’t play out the way the coaches had planned as the All Black lineout couldn’t stop England on the night, leading to an early substitution for the Crusaders’ captain.

Foster explained that the lessons from that game have been taken on board and he didn’t dwell too long on the call to play Barrett at blindside once again.

Related

The All Blacks head coach believed the positives outweigh the risks with Barrett bringing some of the best ball carrying in the country to the table.

“I didn’t spend too long thinking about the 2019 game,” he said.

“But we took some lessons from that, they were learned a long time ago.

“This one, we’re very clear about the strategy. It’s something we’ve talked to Scott about this possibility.

ADVERTISEMENT

“If we look at the positives of it, apart from his set piece acumen – we know how good he is in that space – he’s also bringing a bruising defence and ball-carrying part to his game now.

“He’s probably our most dynamic lock ball carrier at the moment. We can utilise that at No.6.

“So there’s some things that even if you sit down with Scott and talk to him about it, he finds a lot of the roles very similar now, except for a couple of defensive tweaks that we’ve had to make sure we tidy up.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

5 Comments
I
Ibanez 930 days ago

Scott barrett at blindside appears to be the main talking point around NZ, personally I reckon Sam cane 7 is "headline news" as greater player/leader as he is, Papalii has outperformed him in every possible aspect. In light of this, I also understand the logic behind having Scott barrett at 6 (even though I personally wouldve chosen Tupou vai) as either of the two are big ball carriers, offer sound defence, high work rate and line out superiority. As much as I love Akira, hes too "hot n cold" and tends to go on "vacation" during a game. Frizzell has only just got back from injury (otherwise id start him at 6) I understand NZ being nervous about this selection choice as things went "pear shaped" at the world cup. Honestly with Sam cane starting at 7, that has me more concerned than anything

G
Greg 931 days ago

Good to see Scott Barret picked at No. 6. We need a tight-loose beast there and a genuine line-out option. The International bench-marks are Pieter-Steph du Toit (2m, 120 kgs) and Courtney Lawes (2.03 115kgs), so if Barrett (1.97 111 kgs) doesn’t cut the mustard - and he should be given at least the Irish series to adjust - Tupou Vai’i (1.98 118kgs) should be next cab off the rank.
Akira Ioane has the bulk for ball carrying but isn’t a genuine line out option and doesn’t have the work-rate. Cullen Grace has great work-rate but at 1.93 and 107kgs simply isn’t big enough for an international No. 6. Note that when Clayton McMillan was asked straight after the Maori game by the Grace fan-boys at Sky for his opinion on how Grace went, McMillan talked instead about the huge contribution of Cam Suafoa (1.96 116 kgs).

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Six former All Blacks eligible for new nations in 2025

He wasn't, he was only there a couple of years. Don't get me wrong, he's a player of promise, but without ever having a season at 10 at that level, one could hardly ever think he would be in line to take over.


But if you really want to look at your question deeper, we get to that much fabled "production line" of the Crusaders. I predict you'll know what I mean when I say, Waikato, Waikato, Queensland.


I don't know everything about him (or his area I mean) but sure, it wouldnt have just been Razor that invested in him, and that's not to say he's the only 10 to have come out of that academy in the last half dozen years/decade since Mo'unga, but he is probably the best. So it's a matter of there having been no one else why it was so easy for people to picture him being razors heir apparent (no doubt he holds him in more high regard than the blurb/reference of his recently published though). And in general there is very much a no paching policy at that level which you may not appreciate .


For England? Really? That's interesting. I had just assumed he was viewed as club man and that national aspect was just used to entice him over. I mean he could stil be used by Scotland given I wouldn't expect them to have a whole lot of depth even thoe fh's one of their strongest positions at the moment. But certainly not England.


Personally I still think that far more likely was the reason. He would/could have done the same for Crusaders and NZ, just without half as much in his pocket. And as an individual I certainly don't think he'd have chosen England over the All Blacks (as a tru blue kiwi i mean), and he of all people should know where he sits. He said he wants to play internationally, so I take that at face value, he didn't think that could be for NZ, and he might have underestimated (or been mislead by McCall) England (and Scotland really), or have already chosen Scotland at the time, as seems the case from talk of his addition.


Again though, he's a player who I'd happily rate outside the trifecta of Barrett/McKenzie/Mo'unga in basic ability , even on par with foreign players like Plummer, Sopoaga, Ioane, and ahead of a bunch in his era like Falcon, Trask, Reihana. I've done the same thing >.< excluding Perofeta from the 10 debate. Hes probably below him but I think pero is a 15 now.

31 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ ‘Like or it not, this Lions squad will be Irish. They deserve to dominate.’ ‘Like or it not, this Lions squad will be Irish. They deserve to dominate.’
Search