Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Former captain John Smit on why this week is 'easier' for Springboks

By Ben Smith
Eben Etzebeth of South Africa enjoys victory at the end of the Rugby World Cup France 2023 Quarter Final match between France and South Africa at Stade de France on October 15, 2023 in Paris, France. (Photo by Mike Hewitt/Getty Images)

Two former Springbok legends have offered their views on the semi-final matchup with England after overcoming France 29-28 in Paris last weekend.

ADVERTISEMENT

Despite England’s lacklustre form heading into the tournament, former captain John Smit and legendary lock Victor Matfield were both wary of the England team, but for different reasons.

Smit, who captained the Springboks to a 15-6 win over England in the 2007 final after having demolished the same side in pool play, said there would be no shortage of motivation for South Africa this week.

He said playing England is the ‘easiest week’ to get the players up for, but he highlighted the biggest risk as emotional burnout for the Springboks, using England’s 2019 campaign as an example.

“It’s probably as a captain the easiest week to motivate your players in,” Smit told the Official Rugby World Cup podcast.

“I suppose there are many reasons for that but motivation there will be no shortage of that.

“I think our issue 16 years ago was complacency and I think that might be something to watch.

“If you think about 2019 and England sort of playing their final against New Zealand. If you can’t reset emotionally in the week and come down and realise we are back to square one again you can get a surprise.”

Smit believed that South Africa would win the majority of the games played between the two sides however that belief doesn’t wash with the actual results.

ADVERTISEMENT

Since the 2019 final the two sides have played twice sharing one win apiece.

From the last five fixtures between the two sides South Africa have only won two.

Head-to-Head

Last 5 Meetings

Wins
2
Draws
0
Wins
3
Average Points scored
16
22
First try wins
60%
Home team wins
40%

“If we took these two teams [South Africa and England] and they played each other 10 times in the last two years there’s probably a large amount of those game would be won by South Africa. But everything is on the line,” he said.

“There is also a desperation from this England team that got absolutely ridiculed, they have resurrected their campaign.

“How desperate can our guys get again to give themselves an opportunity to go back-to-back? There’s lots to play for.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Matfield was straightforward about his view that South Africa shouldn’t be taking England lightly and believed a shock result was entirely possible.

Their simple and low risk game plan would make them competitive he believed.

“England can beat us. I think they are the one team that plays a very conservative type of game,” he said.

“They play in the right areas, they play territory, they don’t take any chances.

“They take the three points, getting a little bit ahead, waiting for the opposition to make mistakes. That is a difficult game to play against, especially for us who like going off turnovers.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Singapore SVNS Day 1 - Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 3 | Cobus Reinach

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

The Breakfast Show | Episode 7

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 11 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

28 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific
Search