Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Bath player ratings vs Ulster | Champions Cup 2023/24

Bath's Alfie Barbeary (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Bath player ratings live from The Rec: We arrived curious to learn whether Bath could transfer their huge upswing in Gallagher Premiership form onto the European stage; we left believing this could be the first season since 2014/15 that the once giants of the English game are potentially a real deal again in this tournament.

ADVERTISEMENT

Not since 1998, when they lifted the trophy in Bordeaux versus Brive, have Bath been considered a true Champions Cup heavyweight.

Three quarter-finals and a sole semi-final appearance have been their lot in the quarter-century since then – and you even had to go back to January 2018 to find their most recent pool win before this deserved 37-14 success versus Ulster.

Video Spacer

Sam Warburton discusses the Champions Cup format

Video Spacer

Sam Warburton discusses the Champions Cup format

Premiership buoyancy (five wins in eight outings for second place) in Johann van Graan’s second season in charge have the fans believing that the outlook is now finally bright again.

And with new arrival Finn Russell orchestrating their attack and club owner Bruce Craig forking out to improve the soft pitch stitching in recent weeks, their run of 10 successive Champions Cup losses finally ended with a second-half flourish decorated by three late tries. Here are the Bath player ratings:

Match Summary

2
Penalty Goals
0
5
Tries
2
3
Conversions
2
0
Drop Goals
0
143
Carries
94
7
Line Breaks
4
10
Turnovers Lost
14
6
Turnovers Won
2

15. Matt Gallagher – 6.5
Is keeping Tom de Glanville out of the selection and we saw in patches why. It was his kick that gave Ulster the prompt for their second try, but he had the last laugh with his last-minute walk-in.

14. Joe Cokanasiga – 7.5
Unwanted by Borthwick’s England for the recent Rugby World Cup but cherished by van Graan’s Bath. Eager all afternoon for ball involvement and he was adequately rewarded with two well-taken tries.

ADVERTISEMENT

13. Ollie Lawrence – 8
Has been in top gear in recent weeks and he reprised all that and more here. Will be kicking himself – literally – for the error that gifted Ulster their first try, but his frequent defence-busting carrying was so very important to ensure Bath were rich winners.

12. Cameron Redpath – 7
Another who has been impressive of late and he too continued that influence versus Ulster, even joining the maul for the crucial Tom Dunn try and then landing a splendid touchline conversion right at the finish.

11. Will Muir – 6
It was his footwork that was important in getting Bath busy in attack early in the game when chances were at a premium. Less involved in the second period, but still solid.

10. Finn Russell – 7.5
Has been touted as the best bang-for-buck singing in this season’s league and there sure is magic in his hands with his ability to shift the ball. He quit the kicking tee duties after making a hames of an early attempt, but the other parts of his game were up to scratch.

ADVERTISEMENT

9. Ben Spencer – 8
The skipper played a captain’s part, even taking on the place-kicking duties after Russell’s mishap. His ability to make the right decision was encapsulated by his fabulous pass for Cokanasiga to break the first-half deadlock.

1. Beno Obano – 8
It’s been a while since the loosehead has caught the eye but he was top-notch here with his set-piece and his all-round game and he sounded chuffed when talking about it post-game.

2. Tom Dunn – 7
Had one lineout stolen but didn’t falter, going on to score the early second-half converted try that put Bath into the lead they were never to lose.

3. Will Stuart – 7.5
Gave it socks in his battle with Steven Kitschoff and it was a scrum penalty advantage on halfway that allowed Bath to have to courage to go and attack, pressure that eventually led to the lead-taking converted maul try some minutes later. Exited on 52 minutes for Thomas du Toit to do his thing excellently, both at set-piece and with a try.

4. Elliott Stooke – 6.5
A game of contrasts in that he won some ball and lost some ball, but his engine kept purring and he made sure Bath eventually won the arm wrestle. Not bad when you consider this was only his second outing since his return from Montpellier.

5. Charlie Ewels – 6.5
Ran out solo to fireworks for what was his 150th appearance, he can take great pride that he helped to eventually subdue this Ulster effort.

Related

6. Miles Reid – 7
Up against an old Exeter mucker in Dave Ewers, he was a willing ball carrier and he came up with an important penalty-winning turnover at an early second-half breakdown.

7. Sam Underhill – 7.5
Tackle king in the Rugby World Cup bronze final, it was no surprise that he led the Bath charge defensively here to top that particular category.

8. Alfie Barbeary – 7.5
Comes with a much chunkier complexion these days, which generously helps his ball-carrying heft. Will be annoyed that one lost ball contributed to Ulster’s opening score but he otherwise led the fightback.

Replacements:
18. Thomas du Toit – 8
While Ulster fired on multiple subs early, the tighthead was the only Bath replacement to have more than 10 minutes. He was excellent in his 28-minute appearance, scoring and dominating at the set-piece.

ADVERTISEMENT
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 1 hour ago
Ex-Wallaby laughs off claims Bath are amongst the best in the world

I ultimately don’t care who the best club team in the world is, so yeah, lets agree to disagree on that.


I would appreciate clarity on a couple of things though:

Where did I contradict myself?

Saying “Trophies matter. They matter a lot. But so does winning games. So does making finals.” is entirely compatible with ranking a team as the best - over an extended period - when they have won more games and made more finals than other comparable teams. It would be contradictory for me to say “Trophies matter. They matter a lot. But so does winning games. So does making finals.” and then completely ignore Leinster record of winning games and making finals.


“You can get frustrated and say I am not reading what you write, but when you quote me, then your first line is to say thats true (what I wrote), but by the end of the paragraph have stated something different, thats where you contradict yourself.”

What you said (that I think trophies matter) is true, in that I said “Trophies matter. They matter a lot. But so does winning games. So does making finals.”. Do you understand that Leinster won more games and made more finals than any other (URC-based) team did under the period under consideration?


“Pointless comparison on Blackburn and Tottenham to this discussion as no-one includes them on a list of the best club. I would say that Blackburns title season was better than anything Tottenham have done in the Premier League. My reference to the league was that the team who finished second over two seasons are not better than the two other teams who did win the league each time. One of the best - of course, but not the best, which is relevant to my point here about Leinster, not comparing teams who won 30 years ago against a team that never won.”

I really don’t understand why you would think that this is irrelevant. You seem to be saying that winning trophies is the only thing that matters when assessing who is the best, but doesn’t matter at all when assessing who is 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, etc.


“What I referred to in my Leinster wouldn’t say the were the best is your post earlier where you said Leinster were the best overall. You said that in two separate posts. Seasons dont work like that, they are individual. Unless the same team keeps winning then you can say they were the best over a period of time and group them, but thats not the case here.”

Well then we’ve just been talking at cross purposes. In that my position (that Leinster were the best team overall in 2022-2024) was pretty clear, and you just decided to respond to a different point (whether Leinster were the best team individually in particular years) essentially making the entire discussion completely pointless. I guess if you think that trophies are the only thing that matters then it makes sense to see the season as an individual event that culminates in a trophy (or not), whereas because I believe that trophies matter a lot, but that so does winning matches and making finals, it makes it easier for me to consider quality over an extended period.

24 Go to comments
M
MT 2 hours ago
Ex-Wallaby laughs off claims Bath are amongst the best in the world

As I said in one of my first replies to you - we can agree to disagree. If you want to leave it no problem. I completely disagree with your ranking of Leinster as the best team in the world. Now you have said you will change it if Bordeaux win the Top 14. Well as Leinster themselves prioritise the CC over the URC and Bordeaux won the CC, how are they not ranked higher by you? Are Leinster one of the best teams, yeah - never said they weren’t. But not the very best team, as the very best team have trophies to show for their seasons. They matter when you discuss the very best.


You can get frustrated and say I am not reading what you write, but when you quote me, then your first line is to say thats true (what I wrote), but by the end of the paragraph have stated something different, thats where you contradict yourself. Just so we are clear, you said you would too on my statement that I would rather be a fan of a team that won a trophy over the three seasons, but end the paragraph saying you would rather be a fan of the team that won the most matches but didn’t win a trophy. Both cant be true. Thats one example of where you contradict yourself.


Pointless comparison on Blackburn and Tottenham to this discussion as no-one includes them on a list of the best club. I would say that Blackburns title season was better than anything Tottenham have done in the Premier League. My reference to the league was that the team who finished second over two seasons are not better than the two other teams who did win the league each time. One of the best - of course, but not the best, which is relevant to my point here about Leinster, not comparing teams who won 30 years ago against a team that never won.


What I referred to in my Leinster wouldn’t say the were the best is your post earlier where you said Leinster were the best overall. You said that in two separate posts. Seasons dont work like that, they are individual. Unless the same team keeps winning then you can say they were the best over a period of time and group them, but thats not the case here.

24 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Mick Cleary: Five things Andy Farrell must get right this week Mick Cleary: Five things Andy Farrell must get right this week
Search