Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global

'We have to speed this game up': Radical law changes to be trialled in QLD

(Photo by Bradley Kanaris/Getty Images)

World Rugby will be watching closely after approving a host of new rules to be trialled at two Queensland Reds games.


Top-tier referees Nic Berry and Damon Murphy will oversee the trial games between the Queensland President’s XV and a Queensland Reds development squad on October 9 and 15.

Time limits will be placed on removing the ball from the ruck, packing the scrum, taking penalties, restart and conversions, and delivering lineouts.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Wonky throws will only be penalised if the opposing team is contesting, while there will be no yellow cards for deliberate knock downs and only three phases of advantage.

Versions of these laws were also trialled in an informal preseason game between the ACT Brumbies and NSW Waratahs.

The changes come after a round-table of Super Rugby officials earlier this year flagged issues with ball-in-play time and what was viewed as over-officiating.

“We saw this series as an opportunity to pick the best out of (the proposed rule alterations) that wouldn’t require fundamental changes to the game and allow the referee some scope for interpretation,” Reds football boss and former Wallaby Sam Cordingley told AAP.


“World Rugby will be analysing the games to see how potentially they can be brought in.

“There’s a fabric of the game you want to sustain.

“We are challenged in Australia in terms of popularity (with other codes) but they’re still selling out stadiums (around the world).


“There’s minor tweaks we can make and it’s just common sense.”

Safety concerns have been flagged by current Wallabies about the addition of a scrum clock but Cordingley is confident a 30-second notice after the mark is set will not be risky.

“The game is about fatigue and teams that are fitter and can play an 80-minute contest should be rewarded,” he said.


“What’s the argument? Wait until everyone’s fresh, then set the scrum? That’s nonsense, we have to speed this game up.”

The rule tweaks come as public frustration around officiating reaches new heights, with Rugby Australia boss Andy Marinos this week strongly backing calls to limit the involvement of television match officials.

“(The) shape of the game, it is a concern for us,” he said.

“We’ve got to the point where we’re having the game managed by third parties as opposed to the people in the middle, who should be co-ordinating what takes place.”

Former Wallabies halfback Will Genia, still playing in Japan, wrote this week in a column for The Roar he “very rarely watches a game live anymore because of the impact the TMO is having on the sport”.

Rule changes were among Wallabies great Andrew Slack’s first thoughts when the 2027 World Cup was confirmed for Australia.

“We’ve discussed how the game can be better law-wise, but I don’t see it happening before 2027,” he told AAP.

“I’d love to see a less stop-start game, so people who aren’t rugby people get into it.”

– Murray Wenzel


Join free



Trending on RugbyPass


GrahamVF 626 days ago

Rugby was never meant to be a continuous game. It was always a stanza game with a restart featuring the heavies getting the ball to the players. As the French put it piano players and piano movers. That is why it is a game for all body types. NZ and Australia have tried to make it a hybrid game in which wings can scrum and props can run. Then you destroy the seven pillars of rugby. Scrum line out tuck and maul tackling kicking and running with the ball. Take any of those out and it isn’t rugby. I can remember thrilling sweeping back line moves from set pieces. Why just have 32 phases of same same same.

matt 627 days ago

These are great ideas. Shot clock on penalties to touch as well eh Australia;)

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

Flankly 10 hours ago
Resilient Irish will test Springboks despite provincial setbacks

The Bok kryptonite is complacency. How did they lose to Japan in 2015, or to Italy in 2016? There are plenty of less dramatic examples. They often boil down to the Boks dialing back their focus and intensity, presuming they can win with less than 100% commitment. This can be true of most teams, but there is a reason that the Boks are prone to it. It boils down to the Bok game plan being predicated on intensity. The game plan works because of the relentless and suffocating pressure that they apply. They don’t allow the opponent to control the game, and they pounce on any mistake. It works fantastically, but it is extremely demanding on the Bok players to pull it off. And the problem is that it stops working if you execute at anything less than full throttle. Complacency kills the Boks because it can lead to them playing at 97% and getting embarrassed. So the Bulls/Leinster result is dangerous. It’s exactly what is needed to introduce that hint of over-confidence. Rassie needs to remind the team of the RWC pool game, and of the fact that Ireland have won 8 of the 12 games between the teams in the last 20 years. And of course the Leinster result also means that Ireland have a point to prove. Comments like “a club team beating a test team” will be pasted on the changing room walls. They will be out to prove that the result of the RWC game truly reflects the pecking order between the teams. The Boks can win these games, but, as always, they need to avoid the kryptonite.

27 Go to comments
TRENDING Samisoni Taukei'aho on Dane Coles, Asafo Aumua and the Bledisloe Cup Samisoni Taukei'aho talks