Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Springboks dealt double backline injury blow ahead of Ireland series

Damian Willemse of the Springboks reacts during The Rugby Championship match between the Australia Wallabies and South Africa Springboks at Allianz Stadium on September 03, 2022 in Sydney, Australia. (Photo by Jason McCawley/Getty Images)

South Africa may be without the services of one of their key backline players when they tackle Ireland in a two-Test series in July.

ADVERTISEMENT

On the day the Springboks announced they kick off their second in-person alignment camp in Cape Town on Wednesday, it was revealed that utility back Damian Willemse will undergo surgery for a finger injury.

The injury looks set to sideline him for up to four months.

The setback comes on the same day that Sharks Director of Rugby Neil Powell revealed that the Durban-based franchise will be without the services of their captain and double World Cup winner Lukhanyo Am for the rest of the season.

Video Spacer

Chasing the Sun on RugbyPass TV | RPTV

Chasing the Sun, the extraordinary documentary that traces the Springboks’ road to victory at the 2019 Rugby World Cup, is coming to RugbyPass TV.

Watch now

Video Spacer

Chasing the Sun on RugbyPass TV | RPTV

Chasing the Sun, the extraordinary documentary that traces the Springboks’ road to victory at the 2019 Rugby World Cup, is coming to RugbyPass TV.

Watch now

These setbacks arrived a month before the Boks will open their Test season – with a warm-up game against Wales in London on June 22, followed by the series against Ireland.

Willemse’s injury will cause considerable stress to Bok coach Rassie Erasmus.

Fixture
Internationals
South Africa
41 - 13
Full-time
Wales
All Stats and Data

Stormers Director of Rugby John Dobson – when he addressed the media after his team’s hard-fought 16-12 win in a United Rugby Championship match in Galway at the weekend – suggested Willemse could be available for the Test series.

However, scans have revealed that surgery is required.

The 26-year-old featured prominently for the Boks at fullback in their victorious World Cup campaign in France last year.

ADVERTISEMENT

At the Stormers, he floated around the backline and often featured at inside centre.

Related

ADVERTISEMENT
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

22 Comments
L
Lou Cifer 391 days ago

Willemse is world class & only 25 years old. He has the ability to get even better, so this is a huge blow. We’ll also be without Kitshoff, Wiese & possibly Am. Kwagga, Marx. Faf & Jaden on the injury list too.


Obvious choice is to slot Willie in as starting 15. There are a few others on the fringes like Boogie (Gelant), Horn & Fassi etc. I don’t see how Green gets a shout if he ain’t part of the squad/camps at all. Kolbe & KLA can cover 15 too if something goes wrong during the game as well.

v
vaughn 391 days ago

2027 is the big picture and willemse will be ready for then as an abvious option or utility. Lets give Gelant some game time so hes ready for 2027. Fassie defense not good enough. Esterhuizen will be in his prime by 2027 and de ellende will be slowing down. Lets keep jesse kriel, cheslin, arrendse and pollard. Nohamba at 9.

B
Bull Shark 391 days ago

I’d give Gellant and Fassi a run at Wales. Both been good this year.

f
fl 393 days ago

Wish them a fast recovery but I’m not convinced either of them are huge misses tbh


Personally if I was Rassie, regardless of Willemse and Am's availability I’d go with:

15 - Kolbe

14 - Kriel

13 - de Allende

12 - Esterhuizen

11 - Arendse

10 - Pollard

J
JK 391 days ago

I dont think Kriel is fast / creative enough at 14 - swap Moodie to develop him a bit. The Irish are good at creative mismatch and structured play so I think Moodie could benefit from getting thrown in

S
Super Sid 392 days ago

Terrible picks. Kriel got better and better at WC'23 and along with Bundy were the pick of the midfielders there. Where have you seen Cheslin play fullback at test level? Seen him rip shreds on the wing. How slow do you want your midfield to be? Are you Sth African, I'm not but I wouldn't do that to them

B
Bull Shark 392 days ago

Terrible picks. Kriel has been outstanding at 13. Why pick him at 14 ahead of Moodie who has been good at 14? de Allende or Esterhuisen to battle for 12. The only question is at 15. Willie le Roux. Gelant has been playing well. At a push Id try Kolbe at 15 with Willie off the bench. But with Damian out, why wouldn’t you play the most experienced fullback we have at 15; play Kolbe out of position?

L
Liam 393 days ago

Don't fancy de Allende at outside centre would probably go for Kriel at 13 and Moodie at 14…Kolbe at 15 is a tasty prospect :-)

J
JD 393 days ago

That is a bad blow. Willemse is a genius.

f
fl 393 days ago

A very good player but not sure he’s a genius

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 2 hours ago
Ex-Wallaby laughs off claims Bath are amongst the best in the world

I ultimately don’t care who the best club team in the world is, so yeah, lets agree to disagree on that.


I would appreciate clarity on a couple of things though:

Where did I contradict myself?

Saying “Trophies matter. They matter a lot. But so does winning games. So does making finals.” is entirely compatible with ranking a team as the best - over an extended period - when they have won more games and made more finals than other comparable teams. It would be contradictory for me to say “Trophies matter. They matter a lot. But so does winning games. So does making finals.” and then completely ignore Leinster record of winning games and making finals.


“You can get frustrated and say I am not reading what you write, but when you quote me, then your first line is to say thats true (what I wrote), but by the end of the paragraph have stated something different, thats where you contradict yourself.”

What you said (that I think trophies matter) is true, in that I said “Trophies matter. They matter a lot. But so does winning games. So does making finals.”. Do you understand that Leinster won more games and made more finals than any other (URC-based) team did under the period under consideration?


“Pointless comparison on Blackburn and Tottenham to this discussion as no-one includes them on a list of the best club. I would say that Blackburns title season was better than anything Tottenham have done in the Premier League. My reference to the league was that the team who finished second over two seasons are not better than the two other teams who did win the league each time. One of the best - of course, but not the best, which is relevant to my point here about Leinster, not comparing teams who won 30 years ago against a team that never won.”

I really don’t understand why you would think that this is irrelevant. You seem to be saying that winning trophies is the only thing that matters when assessing who is the best, but doesn’t matter at all when assessing who is 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, etc.


“What I referred to in my Leinster wouldn’t say the were the best is your post earlier where you said Leinster were the best overall. You said that in two separate posts. Seasons dont work like that, they are individual. Unless the same team keeps winning then you can say they were the best over a period of time and group them, but thats not the case here.”

Well then we’ve just been talking at cross purposes. In that my position (that Leinster were the best team overall in 2022-2024) was pretty clear, and you just decided to respond to a different point (whether Leinster were the best team individually in particular years) essentially making the entire discussion completely pointless. I guess if you think that trophies are the only thing that matters then it makes sense to see the season as an individual event that culminates in a trophy (or not), whereas because I believe that trophies matter a lot, but that so does winning matches and making finals, it makes it easier for me to consider quality over an extended period.

24 Go to comments
M
MT 2 hours ago
Ex-Wallaby laughs off claims Bath are amongst the best in the world

As I said in one of my first replies to you - we can agree to disagree. If you want to leave it no problem. I completely disagree with your ranking of Leinster as the best team in the world. Now you have said you will change it if Bordeaux win the Top 14. Well as Leinster themselves prioritise the CC over the URC and Bordeaux won the CC, how are they not ranked higher by you? Are Leinster one of the best teams, yeah - never said they weren’t. But not the very best team, as the very best team have trophies to show for their seasons. They matter when you discuss the very best.


You can get frustrated and say I am not reading what you write, but when you quote me, then your first line is to say thats true (what I wrote), but by the end of the paragraph have stated something different, thats where you contradict yourself. Just so we are clear, you said you would too on my statement that I would rather be a fan of a team that won a trophy over the three seasons, but end the paragraph saying you would rather be a fan of the team that won the most matches but didn’t win a trophy. Both cant be true. Thats one example of where you contradict yourself.


Pointless comparison on Blackburn and Tottenham to this discussion as no-one includes them on a list of the best club. I would say that Blackburns title season was better than anything Tottenham have done in the Premier League. My reference to the league was that the team who finished second over two seasons are not better than the two other teams who did win the league each time. One of the best - of course, but not the best, which is relevant to my point here about Leinster, not comparing teams who won 30 years ago against a team that never won.


What I referred to in my Leinster wouldn’t say the were the best is your post earlier where you said Leinster were the best overall. You said that in two separate posts. Seasons dont work like that, they are individual. Unless the same team keeps winning then you can say they were the best over a period of time and group them, but thats not the case here.

24 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Mick Cleary: Five things Andy Farrell must get right this week Mick Cleary: Five things Andy Farrell must get right this week
Search