Northern | US

Rugby Australia say Eddie Jones' job as Wallabies head coach is safe

Eddie Jones' plan to rip up the Wallaby squad has backfired spectacularly (Photo by Chris Hyde/Getty Images)
Comments
2 Comments

While describing the Wallabies’ World Cup campaign as “bitterly disappointing”, Rugby Australia boss Phil Waugh believes axing embattled coach Eddie Jones isn’t the answer.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Wallabies are in World Cup limbo after beating Portugal in their last pool match in Saint-Etienne, now relying on the same side stopping Fiji from earning a bonus point in the final game next Sunday.

If not, Fiji will join Wales in advancing to the quarter-finals with Australia heading home after the pool stage for the first time in tournament history.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Waugh said the performance of the Wallabies wasn’t good enough.

“I think it’s been bitterly disappointing,” the chief executive said.

“We came here with a lot of hope and optimism and now everything is out of our hands and we’ve got to pray that Portugal get up against Fiji next week.”

Waugh felt the Cup failing had been years in the making and said they needed to improve the entire rugby “eco-system” in Australia to produce more elite Test players.

He blamed the players for their record losses to Wales and Fiji and said that the injury-enforced absence of heavyweight stars Will Skelton and Taniela Tupou hadn’t helped.

Points Flow Chart

Australia win +20
Time in lead
75
Mins in lead
7
89%
% Of Game In Lead
8%
31%
Possession Last 10 min
69%
5
Points Last 10 min
2

“You look at that game against Fiji, and we lose Taniela and Will Skelton during the week and that has a massive impact on that game, and 22-15, it’s small margins and Fiji played well, we played poorly, and then you’re out of the World Cup unless there’s a miracle this weekend,” the former Test flanker said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Jones has been under fire for his youth selection policy and his tactics while he was forced to deny he’d interviewed for Japan coaching role days out from the World Cup opener.

Waugh said he was still satisfied to take Jones at his word that he was committed to take the Wallabies to the next World Cup in Australia in 2027.

“Eddie’s made his comments to me that he’s committed and there’s nothing there so I just say I’ve taken him for his word,” Waugh said.

“I’m not going to go around speculating or trying to find out where conversations are occurring.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We’re committed to Eddie … we’ll go through the assessment of this campaign, but I think most importantly it’s actually look at the overall structure of how Australian rugby.”

The veteran coach has put his hand up as the “fall-guy” for the Wallabies’ failings but Waugh didn’t forecast another coaching change,

“We have to do an assessment of the campaign but our intent is to continue with the path that we’re on,” Waugh said.

“I think this is not so much around the chopping and changing of coaches as it is around actually just fixing the system.”

 

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

N
Nickers 17 minutes ago
'Entirely different to what the referees asked for': All Blacks assistant on South African TV director's influence

That is completely untrue. The broadcaster controlling the big screen shows whatever they want completely independent of the referee or TMO. When the referee requested to see something on the big screen, the broadcaster controls it, not the TMO. The TMO does not control the TV replays in these games. I went to the ABs game in Paris in 2024 and the big screen was constantly showing replays of ABs infringements. Not once did they show anything the other way. Likewise I went to France vs Ireland earlier this year and France won convincingly but honestly the big screen at the ground was worth 14 points for France. I was a neutral for that game, and in fact probably cheering for France, but it was disgraceful. Totally fair if it works both ways in the same game, but siting an example from 15 years ago seems a bit desperate. I am saying the call was right. Roigard was offside. But if only one team benefits from constant replays, regardless of which team is benefiting, then it is unfair. Where are the replays of Marx crawling over the try line? - not shown at all at the ground. How painful was it to get the replay of the high shot on Barrett? Listen to it over again, the TMO had to keep requesting different angles, it was not freeze framed at any point, and it was not shown live at the ground after the incident. The only reason it was checked is because Barrett didn’t get up afterwards. Defend it all you like while it benefits you I guess.

52 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close