Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Report: South African Super Rugby poised to join Pro14 by early 2021

By Online Editors
(Photo by Sydney Seshibedi/Gallo Images/Getty Images)

South Africa’s four Super Rugby sides – the Bulls, Lions, Sharks and Stormers – are set to join Europe’s Pro14 competition by early next year.

ADVERTISEMENT

That is the verdict from The Daily Telegraph, which revealed all four teams are looking for a competition to play in following the suspension of Super Rugby in March.

SANZAAR boss Andy Marinos has conceded the COVID-19 pandemic has effectively crushed any hope of the competition continuing in its current format.

Video Spacer

The Breakdown | Episode 31 | Kieran Read returns

Video Spacer

The Breakdown | Episode 31 | Kieran Read returns

Subsequently, New Zealand Rugby and Rugby Australia already in negotiations to form their own competition from as early as next year.

That leaves the four South African sides without a league to partake in, but it appears a widely-discussed move into Europe is inching further to fruition following a South African Rugby Union General Council meeting on Friday.

The Telegraph reports that SARU chief executive Jurie Roux was “enthusiastic” about such a proposal after having already engaged in informal discussions with his Pro14 counterpart Martin Anayi.

It’s understood the lure of not having to travel across 11 time zones, as is the case in Super Rugby, and financial benefits of playing in the Pro14 are the key drivers behind a possible move to the Northern Hemisphere.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The four Super Rugby sides are effectively looking for a tournament to play in,” a Telegraph insider said. “In terms of time zones, availability and the quality of competition, the Pro14 is the only realistic option.”

Should the Bulls, Lions, Sharks and Stormers expand the Pro14 to the Pro18, they would join fellow South African franchises the Cheetahs and the Southern Kings in a competition that also features four teams from Ireland and Wales, and two each from Scotland and Italy.

The Telegraph states that the trial of having South African sides in a European competition “has already worked well”, highlighting the lack of jet lag and cheaper travel to Britain compared to Australasia and Argentina as positives.

A lack of competitiveness has been an issue, however, with the financially-embattled Southern Kings registering just four wins in 55 games, while the Cheetahs haven’t made the play-offs since their debut campaign in 2017-18.

ADVERTISEMENT

Regardless, The Telegraph indicates that hasn’t stopped a “loose plan” from being formulated about the future of the competition.

The plan would see the South African domestic season reshaped this year so that the Currie Cup would be held at the end of the year, with the results of the four Super Rugby sides counting towards their standing in the Pro14.

The European teams would then play each other for the remainder of the year before admitting the new South African sides into the competition in 2021, although how the league will be structured is yet to be worked through.

The Telegraph described the potential move as a “game-changer” that could bolster the competition’s annual £20 million broadcast revenue, and hinted at an imminent announcement from the Pro14 in the near future.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 8

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Steelers v Sungoliath | Full Match Replay

Rugby Europe Women's Championship | Netherlands v Spain

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
Senzo Cicero 10 hours ago
'If the South Africans are in, they need to be all in'

1. True, if that “free” ticket means access to all but the prized exhibit - EVIP only. SA cannot host semis, even if they’ve earned it (see Sharks vs ASM Clermont Auvergne at… Twickenham Stoop). 2. Why no selective outrage over Lyon doing the exact same thing a week earlier? Out of all the countries France send the most “B teams”, why nobody talking about “disrespect” and “prioritising domestic leagues” and “kicking them out”? 3. Why no mention of the Sharks fielding all of their Springboks for the second rate Challenge cup QF? No commitment? 4. Why no mention of all the SA teams qualifying for respective euro knock out comps in the two seasons they’ve been in it? How many euro teams have qualified for KO’s in their history? Can’t compete? 5. Why no mention of SA teams beating French and English giants La Rochelle and Saracens? How many euro teams have done that in their history? Add no quality? The fact is that SA teams are only in their second season in europe, with no status and a fraction of the resources. Since joining the URC, SA has seen a repatriation of a number of players, and this will only grow once SA start sharing in the profits of competing in these comps, meaning bigger squads with greater depth and quality, meaning they don’t have to prioritise comps as they have to now - they don’t have imports from Pacifica and South America and everywhere else in between like “European” teams have - also less “Saffas” in Prem and T14, that’s what we want right? 'If the South Africans are in, they need to be all in' True, and we have to ensure we give them the same status and resources as we give everyone else to do just that. A small compromise on scheduling will go a long way in avoiding these situations, but guess what, France and England wont compromise on scheduling because they ironically… prioritise their domestic comps, go figure!

18 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE 'If the South Africans are in, they need to be all in' 'If the South Africans are in, they need to be all in'
Search