Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'As soon as we talk about getting rid of head injuries completely I think the sport will struggle'

Dan Robson (Photo by Adrian Dennis/AFP via Getty Images)

Back-up England scrum-half Dan Robson has urged caution amid suggestions that rugby needs to change in order to combat the level of head injuries being experienced in the game. Last weekend’s Guinness Six Nations round two games witnessed numerous players departing to the sidelines for head injury assessments.  

ADVERTISEMENT

The action was then followed by the high profile midweek launch of Progressive Rugby, a lobby group spearheaded by ex-England flanker James Haskell. 

They have written to World Rugby calling for contact training to be limited, an upper-level tackle height review, a reduction in the number of replacements, a limit on the number of games a Test player can annually play in, and an increase in the minimum concussion rest period to three weeks.

Video Spacer

Who were the star players in round two of the Six Nations?

Video Spacer

Who were the star players in round two of the Six Nations?

It has all very much placed the issue of head injuries under the spotlight again but Robson, the 28-year-old Wasps half-back who has eight England caps, fears too much change could potentially ruin rugby as a sport.  

Speaking on Friday after England had reassembled at their team base in London ahead of the February 27 round three Six Nations game away to Wales, Robson said: “We understand as players it is part and parcel of the game these injuries, especially these head injuries. 

“It’s a contact sport, it’s going to happen. Unfortunately, as much as we try and manufacture as many situations that it doesn’t happen it’s still going to happen. As long as the players are on the same wavelength and understand that and it’s as safe as possible when we are going into games with tackle technique or whatever it may be, then we can reduce that as much as possible but it is never going to be kind of gone from the sport totally in my opinion. 

“As soon as we talk about getting rid of head injuries completely I think the sport will struggle because you’re looking at a totally different aspect of this sport in general without any kind of contact. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“It’s a difficult conversation I understand at the minute but for us, as players, we have just got to do everything we can to ensure we are as safe as possible going out on the field and really put what we are doing in the week to fruition at the weekend.”

Robson went on to voice his concerns about the suggested reduction in contact training done during the week. “It’s tough, isn’t it? You can definitely go that way and then more injuries happen because the body is not used to the contacts as much. 

“You can’t just have that weekend to be a shock to the system with guys running at you and you putting your body on the line. There has got to be a middle line and from my time in rugby, clubs have definitely got better at that. 

“Certainly with Wasps the contact we do is a lot more controlled stuff, technique work-based. There is obviously positives and negatives to both sides and I don’t think it will be as easy as saying right, no contact in training and crack on.”

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 1 hour ago
‘Props are awesome…so why don’t they win prizes?’

“The reason most props don’t last the whole game is that they expend proportionally more effort than players outside the front row. Should they be penalised for that?”

No, they don’t last the whole game because they are less fit than players outside the front row. I’d be interested to know if you’d apply this logic to other positions; do PSDT and Itoje regularly last longer than other players in their positions because they put in less effort?

None of this is about “penalising” props, its about being realistic about their impact on a game.


“While scrums are a small part of the game in terms of time spent in them, they have disproportionate impact. Dominant scrums win games; feeble ones lose them.”

Strength at the breakdown wins games. Good kicking wins games. Good handling wins games. Strong defence wins games. Good lineouts win games. Ultimately, I think that of all these things, the scrum is probably the least important, because it demonstrably doesn’t correlate very well with winning games. I don’t think Rugbypass will allow me to link articles, but if you google “HG Rugby Crowning the Best Scrum in Club Rugby” you’ll get a pretty convincing analysis that ranks Toulouse and Bordeaux outside of the 10 best club sides in the scrum - and ranks Leinster outside of the top 30.


“Or there’s Joe Marler’s epic performance in the Bristol v Quins 2021 Premiership Semi-Final, in which he finally left the pitch 15 minutes into extra time having signed off with a try saving tackle.”

Yeah - that’s a good example actually, but it kind of disproves your point. Marler played 95 minutes, which is unheard of for a prop.


“Maybe we need a dedicated Hall of Fame with entry only for props, and voted for only by props.”

Well we have the World Rugby XV of the year. Its only been going for a few years, but in time it’ll be a pretty good record of who are perceived as best props - although the lack of interest most people have in scrums means that perception of who the best props are doesn’t always match reality (e.g. Tadgh Furlong was great in 2018 - but was he really the best tighthead in the world in 2021, 2022, & 2023?).

7 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING British and Irish Lions warn Australia over potential contract breach British and Irish Lions warn Australia over contract breach
Search