Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

FEATURE New Zealand is out of sync with the rest of the world

New Zealand is out of sync with the rest of the world
11 months ago

New Zealand, it turns out, might be playing a different ball game to everyone else. That’s maybe nothing new, as for decades it seemed New Zealand was playing this vibrant, fast, furious, rugged style of rugby that was light years ahead of every other nation.

But what we are seeing now is that the game in New Zealand is being refereed so differently and leniently that it is out of sync with the rest of the world and potentially stirring up trouble for the All Blacks.

The Super Rugby Pacific final was a thrilling and brilliant spectacle, but so too did it have an obvious moment that would likely have been treated more harshly had it happened anywhere else in the world.

The incident in question saw Chiefs centre Anton Lienert-Brown charge after a kick-off and make a high-impact tackle on Crusaders wing Dallas McLeod.

It was a big moment as the Chiefs were able to counter ruck the Crusaders off the ball, such was Lienert-Brown’s dominance in the collision.

Anton Lienert-Brown of the Chiefs tackles Dallas McLeod of the Crusaders during the Super Rugby Pacific final. (Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images)

Except, of course, there was one major issue with the tackle – it was technically poor and the experienced All Blacks midfielder’s head made initial contact with McLeod’s head. And with some force.

McLeod didn’t return – he failed his HIA – and given that Lienert-Brown came from distance, had uninterrupted sightlines and every opportunity to drop his own body height before contact, it should have been a straight red card.

There were no mitigating circumstances to lessen the liability of the tackler and yet, firstly referee Ben O’Keefe determined yellow and then TMO, Brendon Pickerill, who had 10 minutes to decide whether it should be upgraded to red, also felt it only merited a caution rather than a sending off.

It was a huge decision as it took place after just eight minutes and while under Super Rugby Pacific rules, the Chiefs would have been allowed to replace Lienert-Brown after 20 minutes had it been upgraded to a red card, it still would have hurt them to have lost such an experienced performer.

But the bigger worry is the messages that were sent out by the decision to leave his punishment at a yellow card. It was almost as if the officials didn’t want to spoil the occasion by handing out a red.

Lienert-Brown was forced to attend a disciplinary hearing after the game because it was deemed by the citing commissioner that his tackle had met the red card threshold.

It was a full house, two great teams going at each other hard and an opportunity for Super Rugby Pacific to put down a marker that it remains a compelling competition. So why spoil it with a red card?

That’s maybe unfair, but Lienert-Brown was forced to attend a disciplinary hearing after the game because it was deemed by the citing commissioner that his tackle had met the red card threshold.

This was by no means a one-off decision, however, as there is a pattern of games in New Zealand being refereed more leniently when it comes to collisions where the head is involved.

Earlier this year, Reds lock Connor Vest broke his neck in a tackle against the Highlanders. The contact that did the damage saw Shannon Frizell’s shoulder hit him on the top of his head. There were arguments to be made that Vest was falling and Frizell had no chance to adjust – but certainly, given there was no attempt by the Highlander to use his arms, there should have been some kind of referral to the TMO.

Instead, referee Pickerill deemed it an accidental collision and that was that. The officials even tried to hurry Vest off the field, which led to his team-mate Harry Wilson speaking out about the incident.

Connor Vest of the Reds charges forward during the round 14 Super Rugby Pacific match between Highlanders and Queensland Reds. (Photo by Joe Allison/Getty Images)

“Rugby has been really big on player welfare the past few years,” he said. “For us, there wasn’t much player welfare there with a no-arms tackle on his legs and a shoulder, with no arms, to the head.

“That’s not ideal. Vesty broke his neck. For me, that’s pretty ridiculous. As a playing group, we were very frustrated with the referee trying to rush him off the field.”

Certainly, the Reds had a fair point that the incident merited investigation and the fact it wasn’t taken seriously added to this idea that New Zealand is more eager than other countries to sometimes brush over things to get on with the game.

If we look back to 2022, there wasn’t a red card shown in New Zealand in the first eight weeks. The anomaly was that there had been three shown in Australia by that stage and the feeling grew then that New Zealand referees were more willing and able to find mitigating circumstances to downgrade things.

Why this may be the case is hard to know, but it’s possible referees in New Zealand feel a higher degree of subliminal pressure than their peers in other countries.

Our game over the last five years has got slower and slower and slower.

Former All Blacks coach Steve Hansen

So much discussion has focused recently on belittling the way the sport is officiated, with critics lining up to say it is pedantic, stop-start and hard for fans to follow.

The latest high-profile voice to be head in this debate was that of former All Blacks coach Steve Hansen, who told media: “I don’t know about falling out [of love] with the game but I think they are falling out with a few things that are happening within the game, that’s frustrating people. It can be hard to watch at times.

“If we’re being bone dead honest with ourselves it is at the moment. It [NRL] is a better game to watch on TV than rugby is, because it’s not stop-start. They apply a lot of common sense to how they adjudicate things and make sure the game keeps some form of flow to it. Our game over the last five years has got slower and slower and slower.

“Rugby’s got some interesting things happening in it like red cards, TMOs, the stop-start nature of the game, the lack of cohesion between the Southern and the Northern hemispheres. All those things create a product that’s not consistent and it does mean people get frustrated with it.”

There is also a tendency in New Zealand for coaches, media and fans to be openly critical of referees, as was evidenced after the Super Rugby final.

Referee Ben O’Keefe during the Super Rugby Pacific Final match between Chiefs and Crusaders. (Photo by Phil Walter/Getty Images)

The officials were roundly booed by the Hamilton crowd when they collected their medals and then Chiefs coach Clayton McMillan threw fuel on that particular fire when he was asked about his thoughts on how the game had been handled.

“I honestly think the biggest call, momentum-swinger, was what I thought was a clear and obvious forward pass just before halftime,” he said.

“That gives us a scrum, we apply some pressure down that end of the field. [Instead], they score off the play after. That’s a big moment.

“I don’t want to bag the referee. The crowd did that at the end of the game, maybe that says something.”

The Chiefs had found themselves on the wrong end of a 15-8 penalty count and as well as the forward pass to which McMillan referenced, the home side were shown three yellow cards (one to Lienert-Brown) and had a try knocked off in the second half when it was judged that Damian McKenzie hadn’t been 10 metres back from a lineout.

The reason the Chiefs found themselves on the wrong end of the penalty count had nothing to do with poor officiating.

The team and their fans may have felt hard done by, but most neutrals – the giant forward pass mentioned by McMillan aside – wouldn’t have any cause to believe they were justified to feel like that.

But reacting aggressively and spitefully is all part of the package in New Zealand, something O’Keefee noted himself after the final when he posted this: “Unfortunately, as a union referee at the highest level, I have had to accept and grow accustomed to the post-match vitriol that fans normalise post-game.

“It’s a sad reality that it doesn’t affect me anymore, but that doesn’t mean it’s okay.”

The reason the Chiefs found themselves on the wrong end of the penalty count had nothing to do with poor officiating and everything to do with the pressure they were put under by a Crusaders pack that performed superbly.

And this is why there is some concern building about how well Super Rugby Pacific has prepared the All Blacks for their 2023 Test programme.

The All Blacks could find themselves on the end of some tournament-defining calls at the World Cup if they can’t keep their discipline in check. (Photo by Phil Walter/Getty Images)

The All Blacks will find there is far less leniency about high tackles at the World Cup where referees will be holding a firm stance and officiating to the letter of the law.

Tackles like the one committed by Lienert-Brown will be a straight red card at the World Cup and probably, too, Frizell’s shot on Vest would land him with a yellow at least if not red if it is replicated in France.

And of course, at this stage of proceedings, a red card will be applied under the existing laws of the offending player not being allowed to be replaced.

Discipline, then, is looming as the All Blacks’ Achilles Heel.

Too often high tackles that would merit red cards go either unpunished or not severely enough punished in New Zealand, while perhaps, too, it’s true that players don’t fear the consequences of a red card in Super Rugby Pacific knowing it’s not going to permanently leave their team a man down.

Being out of sync with the rest of the world on this is not something that is going to help the All Blacks at the World Cup.

Comments

40 Comments
R
Richard 359 days ago

While a might quibble over a few things I think your main point is that our style and our approach to the game has become so stilted that it is often hard to watch (aka Wayne Smith's comment a month ago). Along with that I am not at all sure we've got the style to win a world cup at present. We are just not playing to our strengths I believe.

N
Nickers 362 days ago

I've been saying this for years. NZ players spend half the year walking around bolt upright putting in suspect tackles with no consequences. Then act hard done by when NH referees actually enforce the rules.

ALBs tackle was abhorrent. It was so reckless and blatant that it wasn't much better than being deliberate. He demonstrated exactly why these rules have been brought in and why they should be enforced. Who knows how much rugby Dallas Macleod will miss now? Studies have proven that head knocks accumulate and this is one step closer to a premature end to his career as a result.

The Vest vs. Frizzell/Makalio tackle highlighted a completely separate issue also in urgent need of attention. Vest went into contact with his head so low, well below his hips and actually very close to knee height, that the only way Makalio could make the tackle without hitting Vest in the head was to chop him at ankle height with no arms. Vest's drop in head altitude was sudden and deliberate and left Maklio with 2 options - continue with tackle as planned and make direct contact to the head, or abort and dive at his ankles, still putting himself at risk of a boot to the head. Frizzell was a complete bystander.

The further the ball carrier crouches down the smaller the target to tackle and the lower the margin for error. Ball carriers must be made to keep their head well above waist height when going into contact to ensure all area it is legal to tackle can be accessed by the tackler - current rules being trialled at junior levels in the UK is navel height, this would be a good guideline.

T
Tavita 362 days ago

The history of the All Blacks - and yes, the Springboks too - since the outset of international competition has been to lead the development of the game, not follow. That is demonstrably true.

Of course this is another World Cup year, so the timing of this kind of complaint is predictable.

The real focus of concern in our game, long overdue, should be on the IRB. It is an unsatisfactory, behind the pace, governing body. (Consider for example how well France came on during its exclusion from 1932 until 1947. It says everything.)

J
Jacque 362 days ago

To be fair - Nick Mallet mentioned this quite a while back. How can they play the 20min replacement on Red Cards if the rest of the rugby world doesn't? Players wont worry to much about it then.

As a South African I used to love watching NZ team play each other. Now, not so much. I get irritated after about 10min because of too many 50/50 calls.

M
Michael 362 days ago

I don't agree with him often but Mark Reason's recent article in Stuff which is a detailed analysis of the game is very good.

D
David 362 days ago

well hansen has alot to do with it happening remember foster was his assuistant. next year scott robertson will be in charge and maybe the restof theworld plays it diffrently to us now

G
Gary 362 days ago

Cannot have a game without the Ref, over the past 52 years that I have been actively playing, administering, managing and coaching, there has always been dodgy calls. The ref is human and they make mistakes, EXACTLY LIKE PLAYERS. But in the big picture the ups and downs level off and we end up with a game of rugby. I love people on the side line criticising refs decision while they are most times more than 50 metres away and the ref is right there. Stupid isn't it. But it happens anyway. It would seem that the world is changing from what it was in the amateur era to now in the professional time. But that is not unique to Rugby

G
Geoffrey 362 days ago

Unfortunately the article is right. “We lost because the ref missed a forward pass”. It’s whinging and out of touch entitlement.
McMillan makes the broadest of snide comments about the ref and praises his rabid supporters for attacking him. Disgraceful.
Ardie Savea no better and Jason Holland worse with “You never get the 50/50 calls in Canberra. A blatant reference to cheating.
Rugby league would not let either coach go unchallenged and neither should we.
Now all of us fans have to go forward to the World Cup together in support of the same team. I hope we can improve in our attitude. Foster is not my choice of coach and some of the players won’t be either. But I’ll back them. And I’ll trust the referees so that if at the end of the game we have less points then we lose to a better team on the day. End of story.

f
frandinand 362 days ago

Of course O'Keefe gave Lienert-Brown a yellow. That is the current protocol in Super Rugby. He the referred it to the TMO for a decision on whether it should be upgraded to red. It was TMO Pickerill's decision that was wrong. O'Keefe was totally correct in his ruling. I'm flabbergasted that you are unaware of this Gregor.

O
Otagoman II 362 days ago

In regards to Vest and Frizell it is simply not true. The angle of Vest’s run with the chop tackle of Makalio produced the incident. There was no way that Frizell could raise his arm in time. Frizell was crouched as he was supposed to be. It really was Vest’s head hitting the shoulder of Frizell. All forward motion was from Vest not Frizell. Yes it was really bad luck for Vest but to a degree he contributed to his injury. World Rugby would not regard Frizell actions even worthy of a penalty but you could make a case for Makalio being a yellow for a chop tackle which on revision it was judged to be. As for the refs hurrying Vest off that was Harry Wilson talking out of his backside. The Reds medical staff did not think a fracture had occurred to Vest at the time and it was regarded as a shock when the scan was done at Dunedin Public Hospital. Wilson threw his own medical staff under the bus with that comment to the media and he was rightly censored for it.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
Search