Northern | US

World Rugby unveil new smart mouthguard technology for HIAs


Hugo Keenan of Ireland receives medical treatment and before leaving the pitch for a HIA after a tackle by Freddie Steward of England, resulting in a red card for Freddie Steward, during the Guinness Six Nations Rugby Championship match between Ireland and England at the Aviva Stadium in Dublin. (Photo By Seb Daly/Sportsfile via Getty Images)
Comments
1 Comment

World Rugby have announced that new smart mouthguard technology will be used this month in the women’s WXV to aid with the Head Injury Assessment (HIA) process before being rolled out across the game in January 2024.

ADVERTISEMENT

Players will be required to wear the mouthguards, supplied by Prevent Biometrics, in matches to deliver real-time alerts of high acceleration events to the independent matchday doctor, who can take players off to be assessed even if they have not shown any symptoms. The mouthguards will also be required in training to improve player welfare and allow coaches to tailor the training loads for their players.

If a player does not wear the smart mouthguard and they are suspected of having been involved in a potential concussion event, then they will be removed from the field and will not return. They will then undertake a HIA 2 and HIA3, as per the current return to play protocols.

Video Spacer

Eddie Jones post-match presser after final match

Video Spacer

Eddie Jones post-match presser after final match

World Rugby see the mouthguard as an addition to the current concussion diagnosis protocols, not a replacement. The concept is that the technology will pick up significant head accelerations that might otherwise be missed. The expectation from the data is that an average of one additional HIA will be identified and acted upon per game.

When an alert comes up, the match-day doctor will then communicate said alert to that match-day officials, in the same manner as any suspected concussive event would be communicated. Viewers at home will be none the wiser.

In order to support unions, competitions and clubs in adopting this new technology, World Rugby are investing an initial €2 million.

The HIA process already has a 90 per cent success rate in diagnosing concussion, and the smart mouthguards will further help that process.

ADVERTISEMENT

This new innovation has been recommended by World Rugby’s independent Concussion Working Group and comes after research into ice hockey in the United States showed that mouthguards reduced the risk of concussion by 20 per cent.

World Rugby Chief Medical Officer Eanna Falvey said: “The latest scientific research and expert opinion is telling us one thing – reduce the forces players experience on their heads at all levels of the game. That is exactly what we’re doing.

“The advances in smart mouthguard technology mean elite players will be better cared for than ever before. We are taking smart mouthguards out of the realm of medical research and putting them into the world of everyday performance management to continue to manage player welfare in the best way possible.”

World Rugby Chief Executive Alan Gilpin said: “We have always said that World Rugby never stands still on player welfare. This latest phase of welfare-related announcements reinforces the fact that as technology and science-based evidence progresses, we progress alongside it.

ADVERTISEMENT

“With our latest report suggesting that rugby players lead healthier, happier lives, and participation in rugby up 11 per cent around the world since 2022, people can choose to play rugby knowing that they stand to enjoy all the benefits of this amazing game whilst being as safe as they possibly can be.”

 

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

T
TL 51 minutes ago
Joe Schmidt bows out on a high - but can the Wallabies escape 'the twilight zone'?

All of that seems fair enough, aside from the 10 criticism: Lynagh was injured so not up for selection this year + missed most of SR, Noah went to Japan league 2, maybe an argument for bringing him back in early, but we had Carter. Dono and Meredith (who looks decent enough). Definitely not a straightforward call. Edmed was an experiment that didn’t bear fruit, I’m happy to forgive him that one though, because he did what Cheik and Rennie didn’t do, which was consistently look to develop young 10s in the face of criticism (Rennie’s chopping and changing wasn’t great for Noah, and it was back to the future too often for Cheik, which hurt our development pathways e.g. Mack Mason, Jack Maddocks, and too often gambling on people out of position—more than Joe!). Tane is one specific failed experiment. l just wish we had a more scrupulous punditry when it comes to the recent past (your obvs not in the crosshairs here, it’s the Aussie media). TBH, I worry about the identity piece: feel it should be the salt on the meal, rather than the meal. The Reds are full of Aussie identity but they play the most hairpulling rugby at times and the identity seems to excuse this, while the Brums with less talent and less of an identity in the Australian mould over perform. To be optimistic, maybe it does look a little like the Ireland transition with Les coming in a bit like Farrell, seemingly more of a emotive, man motivator type than the technician Joe. What would have been fantastic and helped everything also was for RA not to burn bridges with Lancaster and be able to get him back and have the Tahs cooking, that is one big piece of the puzzle (the Tahs) that will make our national coach’s job a lot easier.

257 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close