Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

'That's a straight red': Flashbacks to drawn Lions series as Etene Nanai-Seturo avoids on-field sanction for in-air tackle

By Online Editors
Etene Nanai-Seturo. (Photo by Bruce Lim/Photosport)

For the first half an hour of Friday’s Super Rugby Aotearoa clash between the Chiefs and the Highlanders, the home side had the wood over the opposition, eventually building a 20-6 lead.

ADVERTISEMENT

The visitors eventually flipped the game on its head, however, ultimately securing an unlikely 39-23 victory.

Highlanders fans may have had reason to feel aggrieved, however, that their side wasn’t given a leg up earlier in the match when Chiefs dangerman Etene Nanai-Seturo collided with Connor Garden-Bachop while the latter was mid-air.

Video Spacer

Ross Karl, Bryn Hall and James Parsons look back at the Crusaders win over the Highlanders and analyse Tony Brown’s comments about the high penalty count which he felt had an impact on the outcome of the game.

Video Spacer

Ross Karl, Bryn Hall and James Parsons look back at the Crusaders win over the Highlanders and analyse Tony Brown’s comments about the high penalty count which he felt had an impact on the outcome of the game.

Nanai-Seturo, camped on the left wing, rushed out of the line to collect his opposite in a ball in all tackle but the pass from halfback Folau Fakatava didn’t quite arrive where Garden-Bachop would have expected it. The Highlanders No 14 turned his body to catch the ball and leapt into the air and the oncoming Nanai-Seturo, who had dipped his head in preparation for the hit, clattered into Garden-Bachop’s legs and sent him tumbling to the ground.

Garden-Bachop landed on his back, avoiding any injury, and the Chiefs defenders looked up to referee Paul Williams, as if expecting a blow of the whistle. It never came, however, and play was waved on.

Many social media users, including a host of professional stars, were left flabbergasted at Williams, who seemed to ignore the incident completely when some felt a red or yellow card was warranted – or a penalty, at the very least.

https://twitter.com/paulcullystuff/status/1367730767753662465

ADVERTISEMENT

Not everyone was sold on the matter, with some suggesting there was little else Nanai-Seturo could have done in the situation. A number of users, including former British and Irish Lions star Andy Powell, even argued that Garden-Bachop should have been penalised for jumping into the tackle.

Less than a month ago, there was considerable discussion following Jonny May’s wonder try against Italy when the England winger dived over the last defender to score. Revered referee Nigel Owens suggested on Twitter that May should have been penalised for the jump.

“Now what you can’t do is jump into or jump over a tackle or would-be tackler, the same as you can’t dive or jump over a ruck to score a try,” Owens said. “You need to decide if you think that Jonny May has actually jumped to avoid the tackle, then it should be no try. If you think he has done it in the action of scoring a try, then the try stands.

“Mike Adamson and his team of officials looked at it, they decided that he dived to score the try and therefore the try stands.”

ADVERTISEMENT

There’s a similarly fine line for Friday night’s case – was Garden-Bachop jumping into the tackle or was he jumping to catch the ball?

Although it was entirely possible for the wing to grab the ball out of the air without jumping, that doesn’t mean he’s still not allowed to jump to catch it – creating a significant grey area for any decision-making.

Four years ago, when the British and Irish Lions toured to New Zealand, the Lions kicked a penalty in the final minutes of the match to nab an unexpected win over the heavily favoured All Blacks.

That penalty was awarded after Kyle Sinkler jumped into the air to catch a poor pass from halfback Conor Murray and Charlie Faumuina, who had his head down for the short-range tackle, collided with the oncoming prop.

The Lions victory tied the series at one apiece and in the final match, the two sides played out a 15-all draw.

There was plenty of debate surrounding the decision at the time and as evidenced from Friday’s event, we’ll likely continue to see disagreements over such decisions until the rules are made more explicit.

At present, there’s no specific law that covers jumping into a tackle – although it’s generally treated as dangerous play if there are no other mitigating circumstances.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

F
Flankly 2 hours ago
The AI advantage: How the next two Rugby World Cups will be won

If rugby wants to remain interesting in the AI era then it will need to work on changing the rules. AI will reduce the tactical advantage of smart game plans, will neutralize primary attacking weapons, and will move rugby from a being a game of inches to a game of millimetres. It will be about sheer athleticism and technique,about avoiding mistakes, and about referees. Many fans will find that boring. The answer is to add creative degrees of freedom to the game. The 50-22 is an example. But we can have fun inventing others, like the right to add more players for X minutes per game, or the equivalent of the 2-point conversion in American football, the ability to call a 12-player scrum, etc. Not saying these are great ideas, but making the point that the more of these alternatives you allow, the less AI will be able to lock down high-probability strategies. This is not because AI does not have the compute power, but because it has more choices and has less data, or less-specific data. That will take time and debate, but big, positive and immediate impact could be in the area of ref/TMO assistance. The technology is easily good enough today to detect forward passes, not-straight lineouts, offside at breakdown/scrum/lineout, obstruction, early/late tackles, and a lot of other things. WR should be ultra aggressive in doing this, as it will really help in an area in which the game is really struggling. In the long run there needs to be substantial creativity applied to the rules. Without that AI (along with all of the pro innovations) will turn rugby into a bash fest.

24 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Jean Kleyn's season ending injury could be worse than first thought Jean Kleyn's season ending injury worse than thought
Search