Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Owen Farrell explains his final whistle clash with Willie le Roux

By Liam Heagney
(Photo by Paul Harding/Getty Images)

Owen Farrell has shrugged off his post-final whistle altercation with South Africa’s Willie le Roux.

ADVERTISEMENT

Saturday’s Rugby World Cup semi-final ended in rancour in Paris, the England skipper getting involved in a heated exchange with the Springboks replacement and other players from both sides joined in before the anger eventually subsided.

Asked what had occurred, Farrell said: “It was nothing. Nothing. Just a misunderstanding.”

The out-half was the scorer of all 15 of his team’s points and it appeared for a long while that his 53rd-minute drop goal, which was preceded by four successful first-half penalty kicks, would be enough to edge England into the final next weekend versus New Zealand.

Video Spacer

England v South Africa

Watch highlights, reaction and more at RugbyPass TV

Watch Free

Video Spacer

England v South Africa

Watch highlights, reaction and more at RugbyPass TV

Watch Free

However, the Springboks struck with a 69th-minute converted RG Snyman try to cut the margin to 15-13 and they then moved 15-16 ahead with Handre Pollard’s 78th-minute penalty from long range.

Fixture
Rugby World Cup
England
15 - 16
Full-time
South Africa
All Stats and Data

“I’m sat here disappointed but unbelievably proud of what this group has done over this past five months together,” said Farrell, sitting at the same auditorium top table where his father Andy had sat seven days earlier when talking about Ireland’s quarter-final exit to the All Blacks.

“It’s not all gone our way but to build up to a performance like we did, ultimately to come short to a great team like South Africa, I’m sat here disappointed but unbelievably proud of what this group has done.

“The contest was always going to be a good one. We knew that before the game. I thought the fight that we showed throughout the game, we thought we might have done enough to win but unfortunately South Africa had a bit to say in that, so congratulations to them.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I felt like we were playing well. I felt like we were playing to our plan. I felt like we were showing what we were capable of and to do that on a stage like this, in a semi-final, is exactly what you want.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

119 Comments
T
Tom 348 days ago

Well this was the clickbaitiest article of the year to date.

Farrell is an aggressive guy and people hate him so.. he's gonna get in a lot of fights.

A
Adam 348 days ago

It’s incredible how the ability to hide behind a keyboard turns people into angry 10 year olds.

D
David 348 days ago

A bigger pair of C U next Tuesdays you couldn't find.

A
Ashraf 348 days ago

It's not luck,it's pure determination, and drive. A win is a win

T
Tee 348 days ago

Willie leroux is such a puss

T
Tele 348 days ago

So what was the explanation that was promised in the headline?

R
Rocky 349 days ago

England played better smarter than South Africa. S/A were lucky to win.

H
Henry 349 days ago

England played for penalties whereas the Springboks played 15 man rugby, scoring a seven pointer try and a penalty in the dying minutes of the game, which sealed the game for the Boks.

G
Gil 349 days ago

Farrell never can help himself, another misunderstandingeast it wasn’t a suspension, beyond my how he is captain, he gave SA the 3 point penalty that put us out the RWC..bravo

p
patrick 349 days ago

A s.a would have a hybrid team too but no players want to go live in s.a

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 36 minutes ago
It's time to stop hating on Damian McKenzie, the best 10 in the Championship

NZ pulled a couple of very good kick chase games off last year. The second half in Auckland against the boks I remember. Most were around halfway (just on their side) I think, were I agree, this year for the boks for instance that is mostly on their own 40m line (or more towards their own line). Even between those two success', I'd say a 10 meter difference in the area they want to land them. They seemed to stop using the tactic last year after Jordan got carded.


I think they have always preferred to give their opponents a chance to run the ball back at them, yes. What is being see is that it's not successful these days (mostly because other teams are much more confident playing like NZ these days), and the kick chase is being critised as inaccurate. I'm not buying that, at least not yet. Beauden certainly didn't achieve anything better did he?


Yeah, interesting. I'm not really sure what number best reflects what I like, but on review I do see the number increasing for runs. The games they were in control, England series and the first SA test, they were 1:6 or under. The game at Eden Park in the pouring rain they showed the ability to control the game by foot at 1:4 (1:8, like you say, the previous week).


Really interesting. I'm not going to even begin to give a cause for that, they weren't behind in the Eden Park loss, but only had 4 22 entries. They may have lost structure towards the end but it could also have just been the change at 9 to Ratima that changed the kicking dynamic game to game.


I've heard a few grand but obviously that could be in anything. Yeah I think they'd give a quote based on what you use it for?

110 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING All Blacks defence coach says No. 10 jersey 'should be' fair game All Blacks coach: No. 10 'should be' fair game
Search