Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Israel Dagg names his chosen heir to the All Blacks No 10 jersey

(Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images)

The impending exodus of All Blacks following this year’s Rugby World Cup has New Zealand rugby fans particularly nervous about the future of the infamous black No 10 jersey, with Richie Mo’unga and Beauden Barrett both tiers above their competition and both heading to Japan in 2024.

ADVERTISEMENT

The All Blacks took three players who can play flyhalf to Europe last year; Mo’unga, Barrett and Stephen Perofeta. The latter is primarily a fullback but given his experience in the All Black camp and brief showings at flyhalf for the Blues, Perofeta is widely considered a leading candidate to take up the mantle in 2024.

The wild card in the mix is the Chiefs’ superstar Damian McKenzie, who is yet to reveal his plans beyond the World Cup.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Talking on SENZ radio, former All Black fullback Israel Dagg named his top three candidates to succeed Mo’unga and excluded McKenzie from the mix.

“I’d take Perofeta,” Dagg said. “He’d be my man that I’d build my team around.

“He’s been in that environment for a year now, he knows what it is. Has played limited time at 10, but I’d take Perofeta.”

For his second option, Dagg opted for 20-year-old Highlanders rookie Cameron Millar. The young playmaker excelled in the New Zealand U20’s side last year and continued his fine form for Otago in the NPC.

“We haven’t seen him but I’ve talked about him a wee bit,” Dagg said of Millar. “I expect he’s going to have a standout season.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Might be a wee bit early but get him in there, get him in the environment building for that future.”

Dagg was torn when selecting his third player, with the decision being split between the Chiefs’ Josh Ioane and the Crusaders’ prodigy Fergus Burke.

“It’s either Josh Ioane or (Crusader) Fergus Burke for me. (Both) have been given opportunities at a Super level, have shown good signs that they could potentially kick on.

“(But) if I’m going to pick one, I’m going to pick Josh Ioane.”

Burke joins the Chiefs’ Bryn Gatland as omissions from Dagg’s list who will likely look to put their hat in the mix for a promotion post-World Cup. Brett Cameron’s return to New Zealand shores will draw the eyes of selectors as well, Sir Steve Hansen and co selected the now 26-year-old for a lone All Blacks cap in 2018.

ADVERTISEMENT

19-year-old Taha Kemara joins Cameron Millar as a young gun to watch in the future. The 19-year-old will have a year of stewardship under Richie Mo’unga before he sees any consistent opportunities at Super Rugby level, which will come during Mo’unga’s three-year sabbatical.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
R
Ruby 668 days ago

I'd take Ruben Love over any of them, even though he's primarily a Fullback, he's definitely worth developing in both.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
TT 2 hours ago
France snubbing New Zealand tour shows the difference in priorities

Reading this article is like reading someone having a mental breakdown.


European rugby is in endless bankruptcies,  its national sides in endless RWC failings & some of its clubs are only season to season financial propositions BUT, according to the author’s conspiracies, its New Zealand Super Pacific Rugby that, quote, ‘simply isn’t a competition people should take seriously’ (??!!).


That idea while New Zealand Super Pacific Rugby participant clubs continue to profit after 130+ years (& similar traditional Oz club longevity).


Yet it's NZ/Oz rugby that has the viability problem!???


Reality is difficult for you author. See a doctor. Urgently!


But the author's mad rant continues, with the insistence that the way to fix his conspiracy of a sick  Super Pacific Rugby is for it to let all its top players run away OS (surprise, surprise, to Europe to fix its club rugby) by removing OS restrictions  of its best players.


Hurry call an ambulance for the author.


It's simple, a mass exodus of high skill therefore high entertainment players (will that even happen?? ie again given the increasing European restrictions & financial stress in European clubs) will kill the core business of INTEREST in NZ comps & therefore lose the life blood $ of those same TV rights, sponsorships, gate entry, memberships, merchandise, etc. Mass loss in  audience INTEREST & its resulting $$ loss.


RE the French B team for NZ 2025 tests,


If you wanna see where test rugby could end up as (ie 2nd rate) if it continues to allow the  French mismanagement, look at what ‘Indian club cricket money’ control  is doing to test cricket, ie because of A international test team players contracts with  Indian clubs & their $, those players not available for international tests eg South Africa send a ‘B’ test cricket team to NZ last year, likewise West  Indies send a ‘B’ test cricket team to OZ last year.


Relevance to test  rugby & ABs? 

France's reason for not sending their A team for the AB tests in 2025? Quote, 'resting them (!) for the Top 14 club rugby commitments'.


World Rugby is failing to manage & protect the game again.


France CHOSE to make its extra long Top 14  season & not respect the World rugby international window.


France should be removed from test rugby til they do respect it.


Or test rugby will be like failing test cricket very soon by letting national club $ rule over the international game.


If World Rugby allows the degrading of international game it will degrade audience (therefore ratings ), will degrade the $, hence will degrade the $ to players & rugby generally.


World Rugby, Prioritise the international window OVER national club window.


Especially over (despite all it endless irrational hype) failing European club rugby.

76 Go to comments
N
NH 6 hours ago
Will overseas selection make the difference for British and Irish Lions?

Nice one nick and thanks for this. I think there are two things here 1) is that teams are probably now prepared and ready for this shape on the exits, and 2) the wbs seemed to go into their shell a bit vs scotland/ireland and reduced their exit variety. In previous games, the wallabies did really well imo in mixing their exits up between kicking out on the full, contested box kicks, cross field bombs, midfield chips, and run it via the shape you show. Not all of them worked but it puts opposition backfield in 2 minds imo. Vs england, they also seemed to have a clear plan to keep the ball in play to keep it uptempo whereas ireland and scotland they put it out. I think that schmidt might need to add some variety to this shape by maybe either having wright/ikitau kicking it down that openside wing if they feel its not on, hitting one of the forward pod runners and playing phase 2 etc etc. This begs the Q for me - if gordon is getting no extra distance on his exits which is his point of difference, should we just start tate and come up with an alternate exit strategy? And the other part - what are you seeing after these exits? ie gordon puts it out, ireland throw in and then??? Here, I feel like the wallabies can't piggyback out of there half by forcing an error/turnover. Against the boks, I remember the wbs defended relatively well but it was just like waves on a rock wall, the boks kept coming, wallabies somehow get the ball and kick it out, boks lineout and 5 phases later wbs are back on their line defending and hanging on by a thread. These teams can still keep possession too easily imo and put the wbs under pressure rather than the other way around.

13 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Jack Nowell: 'Bath should get a backlash from La Rochelle this weekend' Jack Nowell: 'Bath should get a backlash from La Rochelle this weekend'
Search