Beauden Barrett on how the All Blacks have learnt to attack line speed
The rise of line speed-based defence evidently made way for the fall of the All Blacks dynasty of the 2010s, contributing heavily to their series draw with the British and Irish Lions in 2017 as well as their Rugby World Cup loss in 2019.
Having enjoyed a historic winning period which included the 2011 and 2015 Rugby World Cups, the All Blacks’ reign looked like it may never end. That was until Warren Gatland and the Britsh and Irish Lions showed up.
The line speed of the Lions’ defence suffocated the All Blacks’ attack and laid the blueprint for years to come. New Zealand’s free-flowing brand of attacking rugby was under threat with no immediate answers presented.
Over Ian Foster’s tenure in charge of the team, the coach has slowly added tricks and treats to the attacking game plan and with the addition of Joe Schmidt’s rugby mind to the coaches box, the All Blacks have finally found some success under line speed pressure.
The Springboks game over the weekend was a statement in that respect. New Zealand deployed their wealth of playmakers and unleashed a wildly varied attack that had the South Africans questioning which way was up in the opening 20 minutes.
Those playmakers were operating on a strong platform set by a physical forward pack and while that aspect of the All Blacks’ game is yet to be fully proven against the best of the Northern Hemisphere or even against a more cohesive Springboks pack, it’s a huge improvement from where the team has been in recent seasons.
“To be honest, I think every team struggled to attack line speed in recent times and we’re just getting better at learning how to deal with it, how to play against it,” Beauden Barrett told The Aotearoa Rugby Pod.
“the comparisons between the way the Argentinians defend vs the Boks, it’s so different. The Argies are probably the best at holding, pushing, whereas the Boks will be a bit more confrontational and try and shut down your time on the ball.
“It was pleasing to see the way we adapted within six days or seven days to the different defences based on the limited prep we had in the Springboks game. We thought we knew how they’d defend and it wasn’t too dissimilar to what we’ve had in recent times against them.
“But what you get with line speed is less time on the ball to make your decision and execute your skills so you’ll have plans, those will have to change if the pictures you think are going to be out there, aren’t.
“We felt that the Springboks knew how we wanted to expose that space and we could hear them talking about it, but again it’s up to you to back yourself to execute it and adapt on the go when these pictures change.
“You do your analysis and you have to confirm it out there but you always need plan B or option C.
“Teams are getting good at changing pictures too, you’ll look up in front of you, the ball goes into the scrum and the whole picture changes. So, you’ve called a move based on the initial one but you have to have those overcalls to exploit where the change is and where the space is.”
Barrett went on to praise the work of Ian Foster and Joe Schmidt for how they’ve evolved the game plan without overcomplicating it for the players.
The coaches spend the international off-season dissecting trends from across the globe and dreaming up schemes to counter those on both sides of the ball, therefore streamlining all that knowledge into a digestible amount of information over a two-week camp is a mighty challenge.
Barrett said fully developing the game plan was a collaborative process between the players and coaches but the coaches would focus on providing a “DNA” for the players to work within.
“We figured out how we want to play the game and the direction we want to go in and what steps we need to take; the little tactical and technical shifts to allow us to play the game that we want to play.”
Comments on RugbyPass
Marler was brilliant throughout both in the scrum and open play. His slap made virtually no contact with Ramos who milked it for a penalty when he could have been a decent sportsman and laughed it off, it was non-violent and shouldn't have been penalised. Smith failed repeatedly to kick when necessary and put up a couple of bombs into the TLS 22 that just handed back possession at key moments to the other side.
3 Go to commentsCros was outstanding and rightly awarded France TVs player of the match award. Mallia was brilliant as usual (the y is below the 6 on a UK keyboard and he deserves better than that). Level also seems to have been scored harshly as he walked the ball into touch under pressure from a Lynagh kick from well outside his own half which should never have led to a 50-22. Agree with BullShark that Dupont, while class at times, seemed to go missing for patches in the second half with props, hookers and wings frequently filling in at 9 as he couldn't get off the deck and up to the next ruck on time. A 7 by his standards at best, his kicking was also too long, too often. Kinghorn's overall contribution was worth well more than a five.
3 Go to commentsThe Harlequins team must be in minus figures. Did the reporter actually watch the game?
3 Go to commentsHow on earth did Walker escape a red card? Not dangerous? Dupont has his face in a mask earlier this season. Shocking decision. What is the point of TMOs? We had the Fassi ‘non-penalty try’ yesterday and now this.
2 Go to commentsCould have been a different result but yet again French tv able to affect the result by not showing the very clear high shot on harlequin centre if this would have been on a French player would have been on screen at least five times
3 Go to commentsAmazing. The losing team’s ratings are higher than the winning team’s. Mallia definitely didn’t deserve a y. What game were you watching? Should have got a w or an x. ADP hardly featured in that second half. At one point I wondered when he’d been subbed. Seems to me as if he gets an automatic 9 just for getting onto the team sheet.
3 Go to commentsI’m sorry. That second half was far from enthralling. It was painful to watch.
2 Go to commentsVery generous! If you’d missed the game, reading this you’d conclude that it was the Quins front row that cost them the game. Marler getting a blanket 6 for his demented contribution to the game. Puzzling.
3 Go to commentsCan’t see Toulouse beating Leinster at this rate.
7 Go to commentsADP was having a very average game until winning that penalty for Toulouse, sticking his big head in the way. “The head of God”?
7 Go to commentsHarlequins doing their best to do as little damage as possible with all the possession. Looks like they skipped catch and pass drills this week.
7 Go to commentsSeeing pictures of Jacques high-fiving it with Irish players breaks my heart. Too soon. I need more time.
1 Go to commentsquins is all over the place. The minute they get the ball they panic. Quins can still win tho just need to win all rucks otherwise just don't bother.
7 Go to commentsGreat wins for the male & female kiwi sides. Ireland not far away..
1 Go to commentsWhy is this dude getting so much coverage? Usually knobs like this get cancelled.
2 Go to commentsWow. What was that? A 3 million word meandering article about what exactly?
2 Go to commentsNice piece of writing. And yes the Sharks pulled a rabbit from the hat and were a little lucky with that penalty try that wasn’t given… however the Sharks (with their resources) should be way more consistent and should be putting teams like Claremont away for breakfast. I expect more from them and hope they kick on now.
8 Go to commentsJust what the Sharks needed to get things going in the right direction Defence on the outside really creates havoc for the whole team and needs to be addressed.
8 Go to commentsWell done guys both teams will be ready to play knockout rugby.
1 Go to commentsSurprised that Ramos isn't starting at 15. But what a squad of galacticos!
2 Go to comments