Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

'Absolutely incredible' - The facet of Ireland's game that shocked Shaun Edwards

By Ian Cameron
Bundee Aki of Ireland during the Guinness Six Nations Rugby Championship match between France and Ireland at the Stade Velodrome in Marseille, France. (Photo By Ramsey Cardy/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

Ireland got their 2024 Six Nations campaign off to the perfect start on Friday night dismantling France 38-17 at the Stade Vélodrome in Marseille – a performance that left France defence coach Shaun Edwards gob-smacked.

ADVERTISEMENT

Andy Farrell’s side were certainly impressive – scoring five tries and showcasing a clinical edge in both attack and defence that left the French team grappling for answers.

Edwards did not hold back in his praise for the Irish team in a Virgin Media pitchside interview. Despite the loss he was incredibly impressed with Ireland’s discipline and control over the game.

A fascinating statistic shared by Edwards highlighted Ireland’s exceptional performance – the team only gave the ball away four times throughout the match.

Fixture
Six Nations
France
17 - 38
Full-time
Ireland
All Stats and Data

“We played against a team ranked number two in the world and we just couldn’t get any turnovers at the breakdown” Edwards remarked. “I thought the ruck speed was absolutely unbelievable. They only lost four balls the whole game whether that be handling errors, line-outs…total turnovers was four, it’s just absolutely incredible.”

The disparity in ball retention was stark with France losing fourteen balls to Ireland’s four – a factor Edwards believes contributed to their defeat.

Edwards did of course concede that the impact of Paul Willemse’s red card had a massive bearing on the result,  describing it as a significant blow not least given Willemse’s crucial role as a stopper of mauls.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It doesn’t surprise me that when you are down to fourteen men…and we lost fourteen balls in total. they lost four…it doesn’t really surprise me that we lost.

“They are a world class team. If it was the other way round and we had fifteen and they had fourteen obviously I’d expect to win.”

“The performance from the Irish team I thought was fantastic but we should’ve been more active in that area trying to create the turnovers.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 4 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

16 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Makazole Mapimpi: 'My life is somewhere I never thought it would be.' Makazole Mapimpi: 'My life is somewhere I never thought it would be.'
Search