Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Makes perfect sense': Kiwi columnist's radical merger solution to save union, league from COVID-19 financial crisis

(Photos / Getty Images)

A New Zealand sports columnist has proposed a radical solution to imminent financial crisis that looms over both rugby union and rugby league due to the global coronavirus pandemic.

ADVERTISEMENT

The sporting world has come to a standstill in the wake of the COVID-19 outbreak, and some codes are beginning to feel the subsequent financial pinch.

In rugby union, New Zealand Rugby and Rugby Australia are facing significant financial losses of over $200m this year, while England’s Rugby Football Union is expected to lose up to $100m in revenue over the next 18 months.

Continue reading below…

Video Spacer

Governing bodies worldwide are preparing to enforce pay cuts, with England head coach Eddie Jones already accepted a 25 percent wage drop from his reported $1.5m-per-year deal with the RFU.

It’s a similarly stark situation in rugby league, where players in the NRL are anticipating a mammoth 87 percent pay cut while the Australasian competition remains in lockdown.

The NRL isn’t likely to recommence until June at the earliest, and a news.com.au report indicated that the competition is expected to lose $13m for every round not played.

Such a dire predicament has led prominent New Zealand Herald sportswriter Dylan Cleaver to question whether it is worth the two codes joining forces to create a single rugby code in order to combat the financial pressure that COVID-19 has unleashed.

ADVERTISEMENT

Writing in his Any Given Monday (Thursday edition) column, Cleaver argued that while there are obvious obstacles that would restrict a cross-code merger, union and league may need each other in order to survive the aftermath of coronavirus.

“The world faces months without professional sport and possibly years of spectator-less sport,” Cleaver wrote.

https://twitter.com/RugbyPass/status/1243349998365896705

“A Guardian article headlined “Enough of this epic delusion: coronavirus makes sport in front of fans a long way off”, quoted a pandemic expert who believed that even if professional sports leagues returned, stadia would remain empty for “months and months – and perhaps even next year and beyond”.

“That is going to bite hard.

“There is no guarantee broadcasting rights will return to the levels they are now, and clubs without the revenue lifeline of ticket and concession sales could go to the wall.

“Take the NRL. There was a reason the best league competition in the world continued its “delusion” long after it was sensible – it couldn’t afford not to. It has a rainy day fund suitable for a light drizzle, but if it looks outside right now it’ll see it is pouring. In Australia, they are already talking about which clubs will fall over first.

“The only reason rugby is in better shape is because its international game remains strong, the World Cup is a cash machine and a bunch of sugar daddies in France and England are prepared to run rugby clubs as loss leaders.

“In the south, and Australia in particular, Super Rugby is close to a basket case.

“For financial reasons alone, having all the talent playing a single code makes perfect sense.”

https://www.instagram.com/p/B-NmRMIAtpQ/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

Cleaver went on to suggest that while both sports would benefit from an altered style of gameplay, but ultimately predicted that a compromise between the two codes will never come to fruition, although if it were to happen, now would be the time to discuss it.

From a purely playing perspective, a merger between union and league into one single code would yield a massive influx of talent from both directions.

ADVERTISEMENT

With the likes of Cameron Smith, Roger Tuivasa-Sheck and Latrell Mitchell doing battle with Maro Itoje, Beauden Barrett and Faf de Klerk, it would be difficult for broadcasters and sponsors to not pay offer top dollar for such an enticing clash of stars.

Such a move would also alleviate worries of players looking to hop between codes, with both league and union fans concerned at the prospect of losing Kalyn Ponga and Ardie Savea to the opposite sport in recent times.

However, it are those financial incentives which will drive the rugby world – both union and league – in the coming months once COVID-19 dissipates, and few concepts could demand as much corporate money or ticket sales as a permanent cross-code merger.

In other news:

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

R
RedWarrior 1 hour ago
Four talking points after a 'bonkers' England loss to Australia

(See quote below for context.)


The Australia result yesterday was massive but perhaps not for the reasons the author here thinks. Before the match Australia ranked 9th and 5 points behind Argentina in 6th were in real grave danger of an uphill battle in their own RWC to avoid a last 16 elimination. They needed to move in this November series. I suspected they might target a big match to win for points gain and Schmidt must have reasoned that England's 'rest week' between NZ and SA was the one to target. So Australia fighting to the death here may have given the illusion of a 'bonkers' match but it was a team fighting to death to win their key match.

Incredibly, England are now ranked 7th behind Arg in 5th and Scotland in 6th.

Australia re 8th but very close. If Australia win against Wales and Scotland then they they are clear in 6th. If other results go for them they could be 5th. Australia cannot make ground net summer, they had to do it now and they had to get close enough to Argentina to allow Australia to secure the ranking they need next year.

Incredible by Schmidt and Australia but some insights into the extra motivation that may have fueled that performance yesterday.


If SA and NZ win then its 1,2,3 SA/NZ/IRL Otherwise as you were. This is largely irrelevant beyond bragging rights.

As I have pointed out elsewhere the practical use of the Rankings is to determine the seedings bands for the RWC draw. The draw takes place early 2026 and hopefully the rankings will be taken from then.

Important to be in the top 6, the top 12. (and likely the top 4).

This is because there are now 6 groups in the RWC 2027.

If you are in top 6 you are in Seeding Band 1. That means none of the other top 6 will be in your group.

Seeding Band 2 are teams from 7-12, who will have a top 6 team but no other 7-12 team.

After England's defeat by NZ there is clear water between NZ in 3rd, France in 4th and England in 5th. England are desperate for top4, ill come back and explain why later.

Lets look at Seeding Band 1 and 6th place. If you make 6th, no top 6 team is in your group, you are top dog. If you win your group, you won't be facing a top 6 team in your 1/8th final, you will be facing a weaker team. If you fail to make 6th place you WILL have a top 6 team in your group and if you don't win your group you WILL (probably) meet a top 6 in the 1/8 final. That's massive.

Its Argentina holding 6th now. Assuming England hold 5th, then its a 4 horse race for 6th. Argentina, Scotland, Italy and ...Australia. (ranked 6,7,8,9)

Australia play the Lions in NH summer 2025 they are running out of time to get up to 6th for their own RWC. They MUST make a move now. They must beat Wales and they really must beat Scotland to gain points and take points off them. Could they surprise England or Ireland? England may be the better bet but Schmidt knows Ireland so well having masterminded their downfall in France.

Another one to watch is Italy V Argentina. Italy are ambitious and they will want to start pushing the likes of Argentina. If they win this they are still in the hunt. Well worth a watch either way.

Top4: I think the top 6 will be seeded, all the way through from the draw. If thats the case then the top 4 will be seeded to avoid each other until the semi. Good for more certainty around ticket sales etc. That's a possible reason why England want in there. You're not in there you are hitting a top 4 team in a QF. That's an extra 50:50 match you can do without and avoid by being top 4.

16 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING ‘It’s about his career’: Why NRL star Payne Haas could jump codes ‘It’s about his career’: Why NRL star Payne Haas could jump codes
Search