Andy Farrell explique ce qu'il attend des jeunes Irlandais
Andy Farrell a exhorté l’Irlande à faire preuve de courage lorsqu’elle affrontera la France, redoutable favorite du Tournoi des Six Nations, dans le cadre d’une rencontre « alléchante » en guise de lever de rideau.
Les champions du Grand Chelem en titre tenteront de renouer avec la victoire vendredi soir à Marseille, après avoir été éliminés en quart de finale de la Coupe du monde par la Nouvelle-Zélande (28-24).
Un match difficile pour commencer
Bien que les Bleus soient privés de leur star Antoine Dupont pour le Tournoi de cette année, la défense du titre de l’Irlande dans l’ère post-Johnny Sexton n’aurait pas pu commencer par un match plus difficile.
Le sélectionneur Andy Farrell, dont les quatre changements par rapport à la défaite contre les All Blacks le 14 octobre comprennent des titularisations pour les recrues Joe McCarthy, Calvin Nash et Jack Crowley, souhaite que ses joueurs relèvent le défi au Stade Vélodrome.
« Nous sommes tous conscients que c’est un match énorme. C’est alléchant, n’est-ce pas ? », a confié l’Anglais à plusieurs journalistes.
« Le stade, l’ambiance, le fait que ce soit le premier match du Tournoi des Six Nations après une Coupe du monde… Si ça ne suscite pas chez vous de l’enthousiasme, vous n’avez peut-être rien à faire là-bas. »
Être à la hauteur des attentes
« En ce qui nous concerne, il s’agit juste d’être à la hauteur de nos propres attentes, nous nous attendons à être performants sur la grande scène et il n’y a pas vraiment de plus grande scène que celle-là », a poursuivi le coach renouvelé dans ses fonctions.
« La chose la plus excitante pour moi est de voir si nous avons assez de courage, si nous avons assez de courage pour aller faire ce que nous avons dit que nous allions faire et, évidemment, nous jouons contre une équipe de classe mondiale.
« Si vous voulez être le meilleur, vous devez vous mesurer aux meilleurs. Et les sites comme celui-ci vous donnent la chance de le faire.
« Nous devons savourer ce genre d’occasions et les saisir. »
La confiance aux jeunes
Farrell a choisi le deuxième-ligne du Leinster, McCarthy, âgé de 22 ans, plutôt que les expérimentés James Ryan et Iain Henderson, tandis que l’ailier du Munster, Nash, 26 ans, fera également ses débuts dans le Tournoi des Six Nations, à la place de Mack Hansen, blessé.
Par ailleurs, le numéro 10 du Munster, Jack Crowley, 24 ans, sera titulaire pour la première fois dans le Tournoi suite au départ à la retraite de l’ancien capitaine Sexton.
« Jack est un jeune joueur plein de confiance », a déclaré Farrell, qui a choisi Ciaran Frawley du Leinster comme demi d’ouverture en couverture.
« C’est particulièrement difficile pour les jeunes, surtout lorsqu’ils assument des responsabilités à des postes clés, mais il se sent très à l’aise pour le faire.
« La manière dont vous gérez la semaine est cruciale, en vous assurant que le reste de l’équipe sent que vous avez la situation en main. Il a clairement beaucoup appris de Johnny à cet égard.
« Mais à la fin, la seule chose qui compte, c’est la performance, n’est-ce pas ? Il s’agit de prendre cette préparation – qui a été bonne, voire excellente, au camp – et de la traduire en une performance que nous souhaitons tous voir. »
Robbie Henshaw, le trois-quarts centre, remplace son coéquipier du Leinster, Garry Ringrose, qui est indisponible en raison d’un problème à l’épaule.
Comments on RugbyPass
Nz should have won. I didn't watch the game, but the ref was at fault and the bounce of the ball and the Bokke used the Bomb squad and the Bokke slow the game down and the Bokke scrum. They should remove the scrum. The Bokke are to strong. Not fair. Nz should have won
2 Go to commentsThanks for a much more balanced piece Ned and not that BS that Bin Smuth just posted a short while ago. read this article and then Bin Smuth’s and tell me there isn’t a huge difference🙄
2 Go to commentsWere the Baby Boks part of this game or did the Baby Blacks play themselves?🤔 That man Bin Smuth once again does a little write-up on the game and it is like 95% about the Baby Blacks🤣 Glad he ends off with the Baby Blacks were actually in cruise control for most of the game and weren’t actually playing for the win WTF🤣🤣 Maybe he was expecting the Baby Blacks to run rampant….
1 Go to commentsOne does not expect anything more from Ben Smith who epitomises the worst of New Zealand media arrogance and an inability to balance what he has to say about any team that beats the All Blacks. His reference to context is pathetically thin. He does not comment that Frizell deserved a red card given his blatant manipulation of his body to ensure that he could drop his body weight onto Mbonambi’s lower leg. No mention of the ball lost forward before the All Black’s try (lost in-field of the 5 metre line and gathered beyond). The All Black commitment and effort was superb and there was little in it. Given the Springbok passage to the final and the loss of their hooker in the first three minutes, their resolve and capacity to win their fourth final out of eight attempts (not three out of ten) deserves the praise that has been forthcoming from media around the world, worth reading and listening to. Ben should join his “pundit” friends on TV - he would fit in well. This sort of article reduces any credibility Rugby Pass has ever had. Why persist with this sort of nonsense? The man does his country and a rugby blog a disservice.
188 Go to commentsEtzebeth went on to say: “I would never dream of saying that systems stay in place following a change in captain. To say that would be deeply, deeply, disrespectful of Siya. A while back an Irish person told me they would be fine without Sexton, so I’m just responding to that.”
3 Go to commentsClose games are what we want to see…. What a match it was…. I am sure that everyone was drained by the end of it. The reality of it all there has to be a winner and a loser. The fact that we still talking about it is almost 6 months to the day Rugby is the winner.. Asante sana… Here is to 2027 and what it will bring out.
188 Go to commentsIt’s going to be a good game. COYQ
1 Go to comments“Shock”, the guy was casually saying he was just slightly surprised. Nowadays if you say anything it gets taken completely out of context. Calm down everyone.
156 Go to commentsAll I can say after reading this bitter, sour, sad piece is… Thank you very much! This will be read in the change room just before kick off on 31 August…
188 Go to commentsLook, we know contradicting opinions and wacky comments bring readers and clicks, so well done to RP for allowing always-wrong-Ben to say something here. However RP needs to put a disclaimer next to his comments for their own credibility. NZ was and is incapable of acknowledging their opp beating them. They refused so with Ire and with Arg in 2022 and also the Boks in 2023 x 2. Nothing Ben says here holds water, NZ attacked backwards, except when Kolisi and Kolbe was off And cyncialy took out Bongi, we played without lineouts for 75mins. Kolisi and Kurt-Lee almost scored twice. Thats 3 vs 2 for Boks, but the Boks opportunities was legal. Boks should have been 16-3 up by half time. Tacticaly the Boks attacked better defended better scrummed better (without a hooker) kicked better and crossed the whitewash more times. Boks beat Fr Eng Nz to win in 23, comeon give some credit at least. Even Federer Verstappen NY Mets, Mamoa, was able to see a great human sport achievement by the Boks and their DNA Boks #RWC27 !🏉
188 Go to commentsForget the 85kg bit, that can become something else. However I do like the one off test on ANZAC day idea. SR plays Fri/ Sat, test players travel Sunday and the squads have the full week together before playing Saturday. Rest of SR has a week off. Either involve women's teams in same location or in the other country and rotate annually. Herbert is right in that change is needed.
3 Go to commentsI’ve read loads of nonsense before but this article takes the cake. Or perhaps someone changed the date for April Fool's Day.
3 Go to commentsReally Rugbypass? Ben Smith I think you forgot what the Springboks did to the All Blacks at Twickenham 8 weeks earlier? Springboks 35 All Blacks 7. There is alot of ifs and buts in your article. The All Blacks threw the sink at the Springboks and unfortunately they were not good enough regardless if they played with 14 men or not. It was the Springboks who forced the All Blacks to make mistakes! Sorry but not Sorry the Springboks is the best ever Rugby World Cup Nation in the world. 4 Cups baby!
188 Go to commentsYou just backed the Boks with that fantastic review! Well done! Have some cake!
188 Go to commentsBen Smith please write up something better than this. The Springboks would have won the world cup if you were 15 men on the field. They would have found a way, they always find a way to beat the All Blacks.
188 Go to commentsWow, there is a lot of “could have” and “ should have” in this waist of time dribble. I love the desperation in this story to search for a glimpse at a silver lining. Here are the facts, NZ was a badly coached and undisciplined shadow of their former glory. They never took the lead in a game they were never going to win.
188 Go to commentsGOTTA MAKE ‘THE GEORGE’ HAPPEN!!!! That’s a great idea! A trans Tasman midget battle on ANZAC Day. I don’t think the ABs Wallabies game should be a one off winner takes all though, just the first match with the other two later in the year with the RC. Reason being, no one will ever shut up about how aussies couldn’t win it when it was a 3 match series.
3 Go to comments@Ben smith. Thats knock out rugby. So honeslty who cares?
188 Go to commentsIt will interesting to know which Irish players said that…
2 Go to commentsNaaaww boys will be boys! Now run along ya wee scamp! Don’t let us catch you at again😏
1 Go to comments