Édition du Nord

Select Edition

Nord Nord
Sud Sud
Mondial Mondial
Nouvelle Zélande Nouvelle Zélande
France France

Top 14 : Boudehent ne veut pas être un « feu de paille »

Par AFP
Paul Boudehent (Photo by Franco Arland/Getty Images)

Paul Boudehent, troisième ligne de La Rochelle rayonnant avec les Bleus lors de la Tournée d’automne, va reprendre dimanche contre Perpignan après une blessure.

ADVERTISEMENT

Dans un entretien à l’AFP réalisé début décembre, il raconte sa montée en puissance tout en ayant conscience de la rude concurrence à son poste. Blessé à l’épaule lors du dernier match des Bleus contre l’Argentine, il revient sur les terrains dimanche en Top 14 après plus d’un mois d’absence.

Rencontre
Top 14
Perpignan
21 - 13
Temps complet
La Rochelle
Toutes les stats et les données

De surprise du chef en 2023, vous êtes considéré comme le grand gagnant de la Tournée. Vous le ressentez aussi comme ça ?

« Oui, sans forcer les choses. Je le prends comme ça vient. Cela s’est bien passé mais comme j’ai l’habitude de le dire, ce n’est pas parce que ça s’est bien passé une fois que ça se passera toujours bien. À ce niveau-là, je reste vigilant, humble et discret parce que ça peut tourner tellement vite. J’ai tellement d’exemples de joueurs qui ont été excellents sur des tournées comme celle-ci et puis derrière, on ne les a plus jamais revus. Je ne veux pas faire partie de ces joueurs un petit peu feu de paille (…) Rien n’est jamais acquis. Il faut continuer de bosser, s’accrocher, continuer d’y croire. Si tu veux durer dans le temps, il ne faut pas se voir non plus trop beau, il faut accepter de se remettre en question. »

Voir Grégory Alldritt, Anthony Jelonch ou Charles Ollivon en tribune aide à relativiser ?

« C’est ça, par respect pour eux, parce qu’ils ont marqué l’équipe de France et lui ont permis d’être ce qu’elle est aujourd’hui. Ces joueurs-là, je les regardais depuis mon canapé. Là, ça fait un peu bizarre mais ça m’a donné la motivation de donner le meilleur de moi-même. Je me disais que par respect pour eux, je ne peux pas passer à côté. »

Related

En quoi avez-vous changé depuis vos débuts en sélection ?

« Sincèrement, je ne pourrais pas vraiment vous dire. Je n’ai pas la sensation d’avoir changé, j’ai peut-être un petit peu évolué dans ma manière d’appréhender les matchs. Je suis peut-être un peu plus détaché. J’ai pris de l’expérience, de la maturité au travers de la Coupe du monde, du Tournoi, des matchs en club aussi. Ce sont plein de choses qu’il m’a fallu pour passer tous ces échelons. Il y a des joueurs qui arrivent à les passer très rapidement, moi il m’a fallu toutes ces étapes. »

ADVERTISEMENT

La saison dernière, Peato Mauvaka a disputé 33 matches, Thomas Ramos et Gaël Fickou, 32. Seriez-vous favorable à un nombre maximum ?

« C’est un vrai sujet de discussion parce qu’on parle de plus en plus de la sécurité des joueurs, comment préserver le mieux possible notre corps et nous permettre d’avoir le moins de pépins physiques. Il y a un problème indéniable dans le rugby français, on joue énormément de matchs, 30 voire 35 pour les internationaux qui jouent sur les deux tableaux Champions Cup et Top 14, c’est énorme. Les gens ne se rendent pas compte de la charge de travail et de la fatigue que ça génère. Il y a des vrais échanges à avoir là-dessus, même vis-à-vis de nos clubs qui veulent qu’on soit disponibles tout le temps. Si on compare avec les autres nations, peut-être que leurs internationaux arrivent un peu plus frais. Il y a une vraie question : est-ce qu’on veut le meilleur championnat ou la meilleure équipe nationale ? Je pense qu’aujourd’hui, on est un peu bloqué parce qu’on veut les deux. »


Vous souhaitez être parmi les premiers à vous procurer des billets pour la Coupe du Monde de Rugby 2027 en Australie ? Inscrivez-vous ici.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Commentaires

0 Comments
Soyez le premier à commenter...

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement et dites-nous ce que vous en pensez vraiment !

Inscription gratuite
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
How law changes are speeding up the game - but the scrum lags behind

so what's the point?

A deep question!


First, the point would be you wouldn't have a share of those penalities if you didn't choose good scrummers right.


So having incentive to scrummaging well gives more space in the field through having less mobile players.


This balance is what we always strive to come back to being the focus of any law change right.


So to bring that back to some of the points in this article, if changing the current 'offense' structure of scrums, to say not penalizing a team that's doing their utmost to hold up the scrum (allowing play to continue even if they did finally succumb to collapsing or w/e for example), how are we going to stop that from creating a situation were a coach can prioritize the open play abilities of their tight five, sacrificing pure scrummaging, because they won't be overly punished by having a weak scrum?


But to get back on topic, yes, that balance is too skewed, the prevalence has been too much/frequent.


At the highest level, with the best referees and most capable props, it can play out appealingly well. As you go down the levels, the coaching of tactics seems to remain high, but the ability of the players to adapt and hold their scrum up against that guy boring, or the skill of the ref in determining what the cause was and which of those two to penalize, quickly degrades the quality of the contest and spectacle imo (thank good european rugby left that phase behind!)


Personally I have some very drastic changes in mind for the game that easily remedy this prpblem (as they do for all circumstances), but the scope of them is too great to bring into this context (some I have brought in were applicable), and without them I can only resolve to come up with lots of 'finicky' like those here. It is easy to understand why there is reluctance in their uptake.


I also think it is very folly of WR to try and create this 'perfect' picture of simple laws that can be used to cover all aspects of the game, like 'a game to be played on your feet' etc, and not accept it needs lots of little unique laws like these. I'd be really happy to create some arbitrary advantage for the scrum victors (similar angle to yours), like if you can make your scrum go forward, that resets the offside line from being the ball to the back foot etc, so as to create a way where your scrum wins a foot be "5 meters back" from the scrum becomes 7, or not being able to advance forward past the offisde line (attack gets a free run at you somehow, or devide the field into segments and require certain numbers to remain in the other sgements (like the 30m circle/fielders behind square requirements in cricket). If you're defending and you go forward then not just is your 9 still allowed to harras the opposition but the backline can move up from the 5m line to the scrum line or something.


Make it a real mini game, take your solutions and making them all circumstantial. Having differences between quick ball or ball held in longer, being able to go forward, or being pushed backwards, even to where the scrum stops and the ref puts his arm out in your favour. Think of like a quick tap scenario, but where theres no tap. If the defending team collapses the scrum in honest attempt (even allow the attacking side to collapse it after gong forward) the ball can be picked up (by say the eight) who can run forward without being allowed to be tackled until he's past the back of the scrum for example. It's like a little mini picture of where the defence is scrambling back onside after a quick tap was taken.


The purpose/intent (of any such gimmick) is that it's going to be so much harder to stop his momentum, and subsequent tempo, that it's a really good advantage for having such a powerful scrum. No change of play to a lineout or blowing of the whistle needed.

161 Go to comments
J
JW 4 hours ago
How law changes are speeding up the game - but the scrum lags behind

Very good, now we are getting somewhere (though you still didn't answer the question but as you're a South African I think we can all assume what the answer would be if you did lol)! Now let me ask you another question, and once you've answered that to yourself, you can ask yourself a followup question, to witch I'm intrigued to know the answer.


Well maybe more than a couple of questions, just to be clear. What exactly did this penalty stop you from doing the the first time that you want to try again? What was this offence that stopped you doing it? Then ask yourself how often would this occur in the game. Now, thinking about the regularity of it and compare it to how it was/would be used throughout the rest of the game (in cases other than the example you gave/didn't give for some unknown reason).


What sort of balance did you find?


Now, we don't want to complicate things further by bringing into the discussion points Bull raised like 'entirety' or 'replaced with a ruck', so instead I'll agree that if we use this article as a trigger to expanding our opinions/thoughts, why not allow a scrum to be reset if that is what they(you) want? Stopping the clock for it greatly removes the need to stop 5 minutes of scrum feeds happening. Fixing the law interpretations (not incorrectly rewarding the dominant team) and reducing the amount of offences that result in a penalty would greatly reduce the amount of repeat scrums in the first place. And now that refs a card happy, when a penalty offence is committed it's going to be far more likely it results in the loss of a player, then the loss of scrums completely and instead having a 15 on 13 advantage for the scrum dominant team to then run their opposition ragged. So why not take the scrum again (maybe you've already asked yourself that question by now)?


It will kind be like a Power Play in Hockey. Your outlook here is kind of going to depend on your understanding of what removing repeat scrums was put in place for, but I'm happy the need for it is gone in a new world order. As I've said on every discussion on this topic, scrums are great, it is just what they result in that hasn't been. Remove the real problem and scrum all you like. The All Blacks will love zapping that energy out of teams.

161 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Three winners, three losers from the England Six Nations squad reveal Three winners, three losers from the England Six Nations squad reveal
Search