Édition du Nord

Select Edition

Nord Nord
Sud Sud
Mondial Mondial
Nouvelle Zélande Nouvelle Zélande
France France

Un ex-international irlandais de rugby condamné à trois ans de prison

Par AFP
Brendan Mullin avec l'Irlande contre le pays de Galles en 1995 (Crédit photo : Clive Mason/ALLSPORT)

L’ancien international irlandais de rugby Brendan Mullin a été condamné lundi par la justice irlandaise à trois ans de prison pour avoir détourné plus de 500 000 euros à la Bank of Ireland, son employeur au moment des faits.

ADVERTISEMENT

Poursuivi pour quatorze chefs d’accusation, il avait été reconnu coupable de douze d’entre eux, dont le détournement de fonds, début novembre par un jury de la cour criminelle de Dublin.

Les faits se sont déroulés entre 2011 et 2013 alors qu’il était directeur général de la banque. Selon le tribunal, il a détourné plus de 500 000 euros à l’aide de fausses factures.

Related

Le juge Martin Nolan a souligné que l’ex-sportif n’avait fourni aucune justification pour expliquer ses actes. Il a toutefois précisé avoir tenu compte du fait que la banque avait été intégralement remboursée et que Mullin avait fait preuve de remords.

Ce dernier avait plaidé non coupable de l’ensemble des chefs d’accusation.

Brendan Mullin, 61 ans, qui évoluait au poste de trois-quarts centre, compte 55 sélections avec l’équipe d’Irlande, entre 1984 et 1995. Il a participé à trois Coupes du monde (1987, 1991 et 1995).

Découvrez les coulisses des deux camps lors de la tournée des Lions britanniques et irlandais en Afrique du Sud en 2021. A voir en exclusivité sur RugbyPass TV dès maintenant.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Commentaires

0 Comments
Soyez le premier à commenter...

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement et dites-nous ce que vous en pensez vraiment !

Inscription gratuite
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
'It doesn’t make sense for New Zealand to deny itself access to world-class players'

There are a couple of inadequacies in this articles points as well.


First

Robertson, in what he has said publicly, is building his argument for change as a means to close the gap that is increasing between the All Blacks and South Africa.

Based on recent performances, the All Blacks are better than the Springboks.


Second

Both games saw the All Blacks lead coming into the last 30 minutes, only for the momentum to shift dramatically once the two sides emptied their respective benches.

The failings of the second half were game plan related, they happened regardless of whether the bench had yet (play got worse very early in the half, even in the first half) been used or not.


And third

Robertson’s view is that because the Boks don’t lose access to their experienced players when they head offshore, it gives them an advantage

Didn't Razor have the most experienced team all year?


Also

“Sam Cane and Ardie Savea with Wallace Siti, what a balance that is.

This is part of Razor's problem. That's a terrible balance. You instead want something like Sam Cane, Hoskins Sotutu, Wallace Sititi. Or Ardie Savea, Sititi, Scott Barrett. Dalton Papaili'i, Savea, Finau. That is balance, not two old struggling to keep up players and an absolute rookie.

It has changed. Not many go north, more go to Japan, so how do we get the balance right to ensure that players who have given loyalty, longevity and who are still playing well

Experience is a priceless commodity in international rugby and New Zealand has a system where it throws away players precisely when they are at their most valuable.

You mean how do we take advantage of this new environment, because nothing has effectively changed has it. It's simply Japan now instead of Europe. What's it going to be like in the future, how is the new American league going to change things?


Mo'unga is the only real valid reason for debating change, but what's far more important is the wide discussion happening that's taking the whole game into account. The current modem throws players away because they decided to go with a 5 team model rather than a 12 or 14 team model. Players have to be asked to leave at the point were we know they aren't going to be All Blacks, when they are playing their best rugby, reached their peak. In order to reset, and see if the next guy coming through can improve on the 'peak' of the last guy. Of course it's going to take years before they even reach the departing players standards, let alone see if they can pass them.


What if there can be a change that enables New Zealand to have a model were players like Jamison Gibson-Park, James Lowe, Bundee Aki, Chandler Cunningham-South, Ethan Roots, Warner Dearns are All Blacks that make their experienced and youth developemnt the envy of the World. That is the discussion that really needs to be had, not how easy it is to allow Mo'unga to play again. That's how the All Blacks end up winning 3 World Cups in a row.

30 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Steve Hansen's claims that All Blacks were 'robbed' of World Cup shot down 'Robbed' fans react to former All Blacks coach's bold statement
Search