Édition du Nord

Select Edition

Nord Nord
Sud Sud
Mondial Mondial
Nouvelle Zélande Nouvelle Zélande
France France

Un 3e match d’Élite 1 Féminine diffusé le 25 janvier

@MHR_Feminin

Jamais deux sans trois. Canal + Sport s’apprête à diffuser une troisième rencontre d’Élite 1 féminine, après avoir mis ses moyens à disposition par deux fois.

ADVERTISEMENT

Profitant de la diffusion du choc entre le Stade Toulousain et Montpellier le 25 janvier pour la reprise du Top 14 (15e journée) après la parenthèse Champions/Challenge Cup, les caméras capteront juste après la même affiche en version féminine, à 16h15, comptant pour la 11e journée du championnat de rugby féminin.

Rencontre
Top 14
Toulouse
07:00
25 Jan 25
Montpellier
Toutes les stats et les données

C’est la première année que le groupe Canal met les mêmes moyens techniques à couvrir le Top 14 que le championnat féminin et les résultats s’en ressentent. Lors de la première affiche le 2 novembre entre Romagnat et le Stade Bordelais, 12 500 spectateurs avaient assisté à cette rencontre marquant ainsi un record.

Au vu des conditions climatiques difficiles lors du deuxième match diffusé le 22 décembre entre Lyon et Toulouse, on comptait quand même 4 000 spectateurs dans le stade.

Nos experts ont classé les meilleurs joueurs de rugby de l’histoire. Retrouvez notre Top 100 et dites-nous ce que vous en pensez !




ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Commentaires

0 Comments
Soyez le premier à commenter...

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement et dites-nous ce que vous en pensez vraiment !

Inscription gratuite
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

M
Mzilikazi 27 minutes ago
How law changes are speeding up the game - but the scrum lags behind

Regarding the scrum, I would pick up on your point made below, Nick. "....reffing the scrum is not easy at all, prob the single most difficult area in the books." Those of us who have coached the scrum, and /or refereed, would fully agree. And I have read on the pages of rugby forums for years now the opinion of experienced international props. "I could not detect exactly what happened in that particular scrum"


Ofc the problem is heightened when the referee has not played in the pack, has never been in a scrum. It is very clear, at least to me, that many top level referees don't begin to understand the mechanics of the scrum.


I feel the laws are adequate as they stand to a great extent. The problem, as I see it, is that referees right up to top level just don't apply them in the the letter of the law or in the spirit they should .


Any significant downward pressure by a prop to cause a collapse should be penalised. For example look at the scrum clip at 54.49 mins. It is the Leinster LH who forces downwards first, then the Munster TH "pancakes" I believe the Leinster prop is the offender there.


I also think that with most of the wheels in those clips, it was Leinster who are the offenders. That can be hard to pick though in many cases. Another point is the hooker standing up. That was being penalised 3/4 years ago. So Kellaher would have been penalised back then in that first clip at 04.17.


I think the directive should be given now to referees at all levels to stop giving penalties simply because a team is being moved backwards. And the directive should be "order the team with the ball to clear it, and within 3 secs."


It would help if a change was made to remove the option to take another scrum after a penalty is awarded. Must take a tap or a kick.

47 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ How law changes are speeding up the game - but the scrum lags behind How law changes are speeding up the game - but the scrum lags behind
Search