Pourquoi New Zealand Rugby lance un Black Ferns XV

Par Kim Ekin
Fiaalii Solomona with ball in hand for Tasman. Photo by Masanori Udagawa/Getty Images

New Zealand Rugby a franchi une nouvelle étape dans le développement du rugby féminin, en créant un Black Ferns XV dont l’objectif est de « favoriser la croissance professionnelle des joueuses, des entraîneurs et des dirigeants sur la scène internationale et d’offrir un parcours de haute performance aux Black Ferns ».

ADVERTISEMENT

Les Black Ferns, actuelles championnes de monde de rugby, s’apprêtent à affronter l’équipe de France dans le cadre du WXV, la nouvelle compétition internationale de rugby féminin de World Rugby, qui débutera en Nouvelle-Zélande le 21 octobre par un choc entre les deux pays.

Le Black Ferns XV débutera par un match contre les Samoa le samedi 23 septembre à Pukekohe. Le match sera précédé d’un affrontement entre les Counties Manukau et Manawatu dans le cadre du NPC (le championnat des provinces de Nouvelle-Zélande), offrant ainsi aux supporters une double affiche de rugby féminin.

Les Samoa sont restées invaincues dans le Oceania Rugby Women’s Championship de 2023, éliminant les Fidji, les Tonga et la Papouasie-Nouvelle-Guinée pour se qualifier pour le WXV2.

Bien que la date exacte n’ait pas encore été confirmée, l’équipe des Black Ferns XV sera dévoilée à la mi-septembre et sera entraînée par Whitney Hansen, la directrice du rugby de Matatu, ancienne assistante des Black Ferns et fille de Steve, l’ancien gourou des All Blacks, sera épaulée par l’assistante des Blues, l’ancienne Black Fern Linda Itunu, et l’ancien assistant des Wallaroos, Peter Breen.

Whitney Hansen a partagé son enthousiasme pour l’équipe et l’opportunité de développer et de promouvoir la prochaine génération de talents.

« Nous disposons d’un vivier d’athlètes de talent en Nouvelle-Zélande », a-t-elle déclaré dans un communiqué. « Et ce projet offre à la prochaine génération d’athlètes en herbe l’opportunité de faire leur premier ou leur prochain pas, ce qui est extrêmement encourageant.

ADVERTISEMENT

« Bien que le développement de nos jeunes joueuses soit un objectif important, cette équipe offrira également aux anciennes Black Ferns qui reviennent au rugby la possibilité d’être rappelées et de montrer leur talent. Je suis très reconnaissante de l’opportunité qui m’est offerte et très enthousiaste à l’idée de travailler au sein d’un staff exceptionnel et d’un groupe de joueuses qui sera impressionnant. »

Hannah Porter, responsable de la haute performance de NZR Women, a indiqué que le Black Ferns XV était un élément important du parcours de haute performance.

« Nous savons que pour assurer la continuité du succès de notre équipe des Black Ferns, nous devons nous assurer que nous développons et exposons un groupe élargi de joueuses à des environnements de haute performance. Pour cela, le Black Ferns XV a été intégré à notre programme de formation de haut niveau, ce qui permet aux joueuses et aux futures entraîneures de continuer à progresser, d’acquérir de l’expérience et de démontrer leur savoir-faire.

« Nous avons une abondance de talents qui viennent de la Bunnings Farah Palmer Cup et le Black Ferns XV nous permettra de capter un groupe plus large de ces talents, de les renforcer et de les développer, ce qui sera important dans la perspective de la Coupe du Monde Rugby de 2025. »

ADVERTISEMENT

Porter estime que Whitney Hansen sera un atout pour l’équipe et qu’elle est appuyée par un staff d’entraîneurs talentueux.

« Nous sommes ravis que Whitney puisse diriger le Black Ferns XV. Elle possède une grande expérience et entretient d’excellents rapports avec les joueuses. Elle a depuis longtemps l’ambition de se développer en tant que leader d’un programme et nous sommes impatients de continuer à la soutenir dans cette voie.

« Avec l’arrivée de Linda et de Peter, le staff est très intéressant. Linda était une joueuse très appréciée, qui est rapidement devenue une entraîneure très respectée. Peter est revenu en Nouvelle-Zélande après avoir travaillé en Australie avec les Wallaroos et le Melbourne Storm. »

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

The Antoine Dupont Interview

Ireland v New Zealand | Singapore Men's HSBC SVNS Final Highlights

New Zealand v Australia | Singapore Women's HSBC SVNS Final Highlights

Inter Services Championships | Royal Army Men v Royal Navy Men | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 3 | Cobus Reinach

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Trending on RugbyPass

Commentaires

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement et dites-nous ce que vous en pensez vraiment !

Inscription gratuite
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

W
Wayneo 3 hours ago
Speeded-up Super Rugby Pacific provides blueprint for wider game

Some interesting stats that just proved what my first impression of NZ’s drive to speed up Rugby Union would amount to - fine margins here and there to cut a few seconds off the game and nothing else. To do more there would have to be wholesale changes to the game like doing away with scrums, lineouts and bringing back the ELV’s to have free kicks instead of penalties. Very little chance of it happening but, in the end, Ruby Union would be a 15-man version of Rugby League. There are reasons why Rugby Union is globally more popular that Rugby League and what NZ are also not considering is the unintended consequences of what they want to achieve. This will end up turning Rugby Union into a low value product that will not be acceptable to the paying public. If people really wanted a sped-up version of rugby, then why is Rugby Union globally way more popular than Rugby League? Rugby lovers all over the world are also not stupid and have seen through what NZ are trying to achieve here, selfishly to bring back their glory days of dominance over every other nation and compete with Rugby League that is dominant in Australasia. NH countries just don’t have the cattle, or the fantastic weather needed to play like NZ SR franchises do so good luck to whoever has to try and convince the NH to accept going back to the days of NZ dominance and agreeing to wreck the game in the process. I have serious doubts on the validity of the TV stats presented by GP. All they did was expand the broadcasting base by putting it on free to air, not even any indication of arresting the continued drop in viewership. Match day attendance goes hand in hand with broadcast ratings so if there was an increase in the one you should expect to see it with the other. However, the drop in match day attendance is very evident to the casual highlights package viewer. The only club who looks to be getting solid attendance is the Drua. I am calling it now that NZ’s quest to speed up the game will fail and so will the vote on the 20-minute red card.

20 Go to comments
S
Sam T 5 hours ago
Speeded-up Super Rugby Pacific provides blueprint for wider game

All of these media pundits always miss the obvious whenever they analyse what is ailing or assisting the game. Rugby always has contentious points for debate when picking apart individual games and finding fault with itself. All this focus and scrutiny on “speeding up the game”, “high ball in play” etc is all contextual to the fan. As a tv viewer, if you’re absorbed into a game, regardless if your team is playing or not, more ball in play time and action are all byproducts of the contest. A good contest subliminally affects your memory in selectively remembering all the good aspects. A poor contest and your brain has switched off because its a blowout and the result is never in doubt or it’s a real chore to watch and remain engaged throughout. The URC, Top 14 and English premiership are all competitions that feel like there’s real jeopardy each week. The dominance of Super rugby by NZ teams was unhealthy from a sustainable interest perspective. You can’t fault those teams or the players, but the lack of competitions won by SA and Australian teams long term was always going to test the faith and patience of die-hard and casual fans from those regions. SANZAR took their eye off the fans and fans voted with their feet and subscriptions. They were so concerned about expanding their product they forgot the golden rule about broadcasting live sport. Viewers tune in more when there’s an atmosphere and a true contest. You need to fill stadiums to create one, host unions need to do more to service ticket buyers, and this year proves the other, there’s more interest in Super rugby this year only because more games are competitive with less foregone conclusions. All these micro statistics bandied about, only interest the bean counters and trainspotters.

20 Go to comments
B
Bull Shark 10 hours ago
Speeded-up Super Rugby Pacific provides blueprint for wider game

I’m all for speeding up the game. But can we be certain that the slowness of the game contributed to fans walking out? I’m not so sure. Super rugby largely suffered from most fans only being able to, really, follow the games played in their own time zone. So at least a third of the fan base wasn’t engaged at any point in time. As a Saffer following SA teams in the URC - I now watch virtually every European game played on the weekend. In SR, I wouldn’t be bothered to follow the games being played on the other side of the world, at weird hours, if my team wasn’t playing. I now follow the whole tournament and not just the games in my time zone. Second, with New Zealand teams always winning. It’s like formula one. When one team dominates, people lose interest. After COVID, with SA leaving and Australia dipping in form, SR became an even greater one horse race. Thats why I think Japan’s league needs to get in the mix. The international flavor of those teams could make for a great spectacle. But surely if we believe that shaving seconds off lost time events in rugby is going to draw fans back, we should be shown some figures that supports this idea before we draw any major conclusions. Where are the stats that shows these changes have made that sort of impact? We’ve measured down to the average no. Of seconds per game. Where the measurement of the impact on the fanbase? Does a rugby “fan” who lost interest because of ball in play time suddenly have a revived interest because we’ve saved or brought back into play a matter of seconds or a few minutes each game? I doubt it. I don’t thinks it’s even a noticeable difference to be impactful. The 20 min red card idea. Agreed. Let’s give it a go. But I think it’s fairer that the player sent off is substituted and plays no further part in the game as a consequence.

20 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING OTD – Declan Kidney takes step up into Test rugby OTD – Declan Kidney takes step up into Test rugby
Search