Le retour de Pierre-Louis Barassi : appliqué, discret en attaque et prometteur

In most situations where the 10 isn’t the main goal kicker. The 10 is normally a good kicker, but another player is just better. In that situation someone else doing the kicking is fine.

But if the 10 doesn’t do it, then someone else has to. Often that player is not as good as another player in that position. In 1993 it was Shane Howath, who was a bit average at 15, in a test, and probably wouldn’t be in the team other than he was the goal kicker, because Steven Bachop (who was a gun punter, couldn’t be bothered to practice kicking goals).

As someone has to do the goal kicking, it makes sense that the best kicker in the team does gets the responsibility.

The 10 should have a good boot for punting etc. It isn’t a coincidence that most 10s are the goal kicker, because it’s normally just a matter of practice on top of a core skill for that position.

With the skill they already have with kicking, it’s not a stretch that they put a bit more practice in and become at least a passable goal kicker.

Yes, you can have the 10 as just a runner/passer, but that means the other backs are not the best at the core roles for their positions because they have to cover the core roles the 10 doesn’t have.

Makes one think how many chances will he get, while there are guys, that rarely ever, or even never get one.

20 caps for England already, without ever being convincing. Meanwhile, Ted Hill’s got two.

The Chiefs are clearly rolling a dice here, hoping they’d be able to fix what no one else could.

If they manage, it’s a steal.

Specialist positions need specialists.

Will he unleash his dastardly new plan against the Lions, to lose all three games 100+ nil?

What new method do you think Schmidt (and the NZRU, along with World Rugby) are planning to use to keep the Wallabies down this time?

Why does Rugby Australia not see this? Are they in on the plan? Or is Robertson Rugby Australia’s attempt to even the score?

Are you and Phil Kerns good mates? Or are you Phil Kerns?

I am interest to know how much of your ‘shtick‘ is genuine and how much is just trolling? If you really believe what you write, get help.