Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

When is it going to be the fault of the All Blacks' players for their results

By Hamish Bidwell
The All Blacks look on dejected during the International Test match between the All Blacks and Ireland. (Photo by Phil Walter/Getty Images)

And then there were the players.

Sure, it’s been fun to see how badly New Zealand Rugby (NZR) have mismanaged their business.

ADVERTISEMENT

And, yes, it’s been amusing to see critics from all corners of the game come out to give the coaching of Ian Foster a kicking.

But what about the actual blokes in black? The ones who continue to let the jersey down.

When’s their day of reckoning?

It’s easy to let off-the-park issues obscure what’s happening on it.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Whether it’s NZR chief executive Mark Robinson giving Foster a two-game stay of execution, seeing John Plumtree and Brad Mooar sacked as All Blacks assistant coaches, comms people Mike Jaspers and Joe Malcolm huffing and puffing on LinkedIn or Steve Hansen and David Moffett offering their two bobs’ worth, we’ve not been short of distractions.

Winning masks a lot of problems, but when results go bad it’s amazing how much disharmony becomes apparent.

But that’s all waffle.

It’s stuff that journalists and rugby insiders and corporate governance aficionados get their knickers in a twist about.

Rugby’s what matters to fans and that’s what should be the real issue here.

For all that’s wrong within the running of NZR and the All Blacks, the fact remains that the team aren’t very good.

ADVERTISEMENT

These blokes, with their flash haircuts and sabbaticals and tattoos and massive wages, simply haven’t delivered. Not this year, not last year and not the two seasons before that either.

Not when it counts, at least.

No, they’ve been found physically and tactically wanting.

They’ve lost lineouts, missed tackles, dropped passes and kicked away good ball too often to be regarded as an elite team.

If they spent as much time on skill execution or studying the opposition, as they do writing messages on their wrist bands or practising fancy handshakes and try celebrations,
maybe they’d win a game now and then.

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

Let’s look at this team.

Scrum? Middling to poor.

Lineout? Poor.

Defence? Suspect.

Attack? Clunky.

Attitude? Average.

Desire? Seemingly non-existent.

I could go on.

These are men who’ve been in teams all their lives. Men who’ve had good coaches and bad coaches, been part of good cultures and bad cultures, had talented teammates and donkeys for teammates.

They’ve made it this far because, presumably, they could rise above their circumstances.

Whether their club or school or province or franchise was superbly run didn’t matter. They found a way to win.

Hansen made some interesting points about NZR last week. Much of it, you’d have to say, was entirely valid.

But Robinson and company aren’t out there on the park. That’s still the players’ domain and just because things may be shambolic off the field, doesn’t mean they should be the same on it.

So before we lampoon Foster again or call for Robinson’s resignation, let’s think about the players for a moment.

At some point, we all have to admit that they are the ones responsible for the team’s poor performances and disappointing results and that they are the only ones who can fix them.

But don’t tell us about it, fellas. Don’t tell us you’re hurting or you’re united or that you’re right behind old mate Fozzie.

Go out and show us something and put a bit of pride back in the jersey.

We’re forever told that players strive to leave the jersey better than they found it. Well, there aren’t many of this current mob who could possibly claim that.

There are sacrifices made in every part of New Zealand rugby to ensure that the All Blacks can be successful. Every team in every town in this fine country makes do with less, so the
All Blacks can have more.

People are happy to do that as long as the team keeps winning. Well, the winning’s stopped and the only people who appear not to be suffering any consequences are the players.

When’s it actually going to be their fault?

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 8

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Steelers v Sungoliath | Full Match Replay

Rugby Europe Women's Championship | Netherlands v Spain

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
Senzo Cicero 16 hours ago
'If the South Africans are in, they need to be all in'

1. True, if that “free” ticket means access to all but the prized exhibit - EVIP only. SA cannot host semis, even if they’ve earned it (see Sharks vs ASM Clermont Auvergne at… Twickenham Stoop). 2. Why no selective outrage over Lyon doing the exact same thing a week earlier? Out of all the countries France send the most “B teams”, why nobody talking about “disrespect” and “prioritising domestic leagues” and “kicking them out”? 3. Why no mention of the Sharks fielding all of their Springboks for the second rate Challenge cup QF? No commitment? 4. Why no mention of all the SA teams qualifying for respective euro knock out comps in the two seasons they’ve been in it? How many euro teams have qualified for KO’s in their history? Can’t compete? 5. Why no mention of SA teams beating French and English giants La Rochelle and Saracens? How many euro teams have done that in their history? Add no quality? The fact is that SA teams are only in their second season in europe, with no status and a fraction of the resources. Since joining the URC, SA has seen a repatriation of a number of players, and this will only grow once SA start sharing in the profits of competing in these comps, meaning bigger squads with greater depth and quality, meaning they don’t have to prioritise comps as they have to now - they don’t have imports from Pacifica and South America and everywhere else in between like “European” teams have - also less “Saffas” in Prem and T14, that’s what we want right? 'If the South Africans are in, they need to be all in' True, and we have to ensure we give them the same status and resources as we give everyone else to do just that. A small compromise on scheduling will go a long way in avoiding these situations, but guess what, France and England wont compromise on scheduling because they ironically… prioritise their domestic comps, go figure!

20 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Ex-All Black Aaron Cruden emerges as a candidate for Ireland move Ex-All Black Aaron Cruden emerges as a candidate for Ireland move
Search