Northern | US

What Rassie’s risky business says about the Springboks


GettyImages-2292057881
Comments
77 Comments

An Airlink Embraer E195 jet has no business skimming the roof of a sports stadium. Nor does a rugby coach have much business changing his team less than 48 hours before kick-off, let alone replacing an entire front row an hour before the opening whistle. Yet both things happened in Cape Town.

ADVERTISEMENT

South Africans do things differently when the stakes rise. Risk is not always a red line. Sometimes it is an invitation to create something special.

The planes passed perilously close to the stadium. Rassie Erasmus’s side then staged a narrow escape of their own, absorbing an All Blacks comeback before holding on for a seven-point victory that kept the series alive. In South African rugby, the result is often its own absolution.

VIDEO

The response began with an explosion. Maybe Jesse Kriel barrelling over mere minutes after the opening whistle was a consequence of all the difficult conversations and quiet introspection over the past seven days. Maybe this really is a team that needs something to prove. Whatever the motivation, they were magnificent.

They were also more direct. The midfield had been strangely peripheral in Johannesburg, with too much responsibility placed on Jasper Wiese to provide momentum on his own. This time Damian de Allende and Kriel were central to the plan. They carried with intent, looked for contact and, crucially, kept South Africa moving forward after the first collision.

Fixture
Internationals
South Africa
33 - 26
Full-time
New Zealand
All Stats and Data

In Cape Town, the threat arrived from several places. This was not just about making metres. It was about distributing the burden. A team becomes one-dimensional when one player is repeatedly asked to be the battering ram. Wiese was still used as a blunt instrument, but he was no longer the only one. De Allende and Kriel carried with greater purpose, while the forwards complemented the midfield rather than compensating for its absence. The violence had shape.

The change at the breakdown was just as important. South Africa were not necessarily faster than New Zealand, but they were far more aggressive. They attacked the ball instead of merely arriving at the ruck and trying to secure it. Last week it felt as if they tried to prise the New Zealand ruck loose with a scalpel. This time they went in with a machete.

ADVERTISEMENT

Malcolm Marx was the clearest expression of that menace. He was unreal, a walking cheat code. The hooker seemed to appear wherever New Zealand thought it had secured possession. His steals altered the mood inside the stadium. Every turnover told the All Blacks that the next phase could not be taken for granted.

Kriel added two turnovers of his own, and South Africa won five in total to New Zealand’s two. In Johannesburg, the equivalent figures had been 14-5 in New Zealand’s favour. That statistical reversal captured the difference between the two Tests.

New Zealand still produced moments of brilliance. Their first-phase attack was outstanding, particularly when they found a way around a rush defence that moved at a higher tempo. Cam Roigard, Leroy Carter and Ardie Savea all scored tries that showed how quickly the All Blacks can turn a narrow gap into a genuine attacking opportunity.

South Africa’s rush defence did much of what it was supposed to do, compressing the field and closing options. But the missed tackles – 39 of them – remain a concern, even if advocates of this frenetic defensive system will argue that some risk is unavoidable.

ADVERTISEMENT

New Zealand deserve credit for making South Africa work so hard. The difference was that the Boks no longer allowed one weakness to become another. A New Zealand break did not immediately become a South African error. They scrambled, reset and waited for the next moment. It felt familiar, like they remembered who they were.

Their lineout provided another form of control. South Africa won all nine of their throws, while New Zealand won 81 per cent. Eben Etzebeth had his best game for some time and was formidable at the set-piece, giving the Boks a dependable source of possession.

There was still discomfort in the way New Zealand’s long kicking game pinned South Africa back. The Boks spent too long starting attacks from deep. But their own kicking strategy was better judged. Cobus Reinach’s box hoists were more accurate despite the difficult conditions, and Ethan Hooker bossed the skies.

The victory did not put a lid on Dave Rennie’s moaning in his post-match press conference. The All Blacks coach suggested that South Africa were “walking around” at scrum time, having already raised concerns with World Rugby. There may have been a technical point buried in there, but by the time Rennie repeated it publicly, it sounded like a coach trying to influence the next referee before the next whistle had been blown.

Erasmus was having none of it. “We’re not fucking walking around,” he said. “We’re scrumming through.” It was crude, theatrical and entirely on brand. Rennie wanted the argument heard. Erasmus wanted to own it. The scrum became another contest South Africa dragged into its preferred territory: physical, emotional and impossible to separate from the noise around it.

South Africa also treated the scoreboard with the seriousness the occasion required. They took their points. Cheslin Kolbe kicked four penalties and three conversions, contributing 18 points.

New Zealand scored four tries to South Africa’s three, yet the Springboks won 33-26. They had less possession and territory, but they were more ruthless when the chances came.

Sacha Feinberg-Mngomezulu played his part. He was still inventive, producing a wonderful raking kick towards Kolbe in the corner in the first half and a long pass to Hooker that sparked some much-needed go-forward in the second. But he was less mercurial and less individualistic. He did not try to turn every possession into a personal audition.

And then there was Siya Kolisi. He forced me to eat a large helping of humble pie. I wrote him off too quickly. His return was not merely symbolic. He carried with authority, defended with bite and scored the try that gave South Africa their valuable half-time cushion. His influence was not always loud, but it was unmistakable. Not for the first time, he made a doubter look pretty foolish.

The final quarter offered one last warning. New Zealand had 66 per cent possession in the last 10 minutes and reduced the deficit to seven points through Savea. South Africa were suddenly defending survival rather than control. Yet they held their nerve. Cameron Hanekom’s late turnover ended the final threat.

The Springboks were not flawless, but they corrected enough. They shared the carrying load, attacked the breakdown, trusted their set piece and took their points. This is the bargain they make with danger. Their 2023 World Cup run was built on three one-point knockout victories, and survival has become embedded in their identity.

That makes them thrilling and faintly terrifying in equal measure. They do not simply flirt with risk; they tether themselves to it.

On Saturday, an Airlink jet came perilously close to the stadium roof. South Africa then came perilously close to allowing New Zealand back into the match. In both cases, disaster was avoided at the last possible moment. For now, the planes are airborne and the series is alive.

Follow your favourites in the RugbyPass App

Your home for rugby. Download the RugbyPass app on the App Store (iOS) and Google Play (Android) now!


Follow your favourite teams, tournaments and players, and get personalised news and Match Centre notifications direct to your device.


From live rugby streams and upcoming fixtures to breaking news, in-depth analysis and live scores, RugbyPass has everything you need to stay connected to the game.

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

77 Comments
B
B 7 days ago

I don’t doubt you know that - you turned up hoping there would be hurdles so you could laugh. But your frown didn’t turn upside down. Must have been so disappointed.


I’m not a clown. Not even as a side hussle.

H
Hammer Head 8 days ago

What I know for sure is that there is no women’s 100m wheelchair hurdles event. And that you are a clown.

B
B 8 days ago

The distance isn't only 110m. You clearly didn't know that. Don’t wait until post-match on Saturday to be humble.


They obviously won't be able to. Not even a trip to a Bloemfontein testing lab could give them a boost for that. My point of course was that your callous mind would find humour in their attempts to do it. Another thing to mock.


Is that a rhetorical question?


I thought you were a Tarantino fan. My bad.

H
Hammer Head 9 days ago

Well this was fun. Gosh I can’t wait for Saturday.


I’m going double or nothing on the ABs to win.

J
Johno58 10 days ago

It is public knowledge that the testing program of the South African Anti Doping Agency has virtually collapsed. The total number of tests conducted now mean there is no deterrent effect on rugby players (or other athletes) to using performance enhancing drugs.

The questions I have are: what are the numbers of no-notice, out-of-competition tests have been conducted on top tier SA Rugby players in the past 2 years? Secondly, who carried out the tests?

The integrity of World Rugby must be upheld.

P
PB 9 days ago

As a complete neutral,I would ask if you had those figures already for the All Blacks?

H
Hammer Head 10 days ago

Good questions. Why don’t you use your keyboard skills and research the answers?

R
Red and White Dynamight 12 days ago

This journo is yet another South African syco’fan’t. And the Safas get worked up about Ben Smith.

H
Hammer Head 10 days ago

Using big words you can’t spell makes you look even dumber than you are. Doesn’t your desktop have spell check?

D
DG 11 days ago

Ive been called a South African sycophant and a troll against the Boks in the same piece. Weird.

P
Piston 12 days ago

Geez mate, moaning about the planes and the “run-on” change, relax and just enjoy the rugby. it was another helluva of game two real tests and Saturday we go again - with planes and all……

M
MC_ 10 days ago

I agree. Keyboard warriors crying about EVERYTHING. Silence during the haka, media drama about the scrums, airplanes, TMOs. End of the day, we’ve had 2 massive tests that exceeded my expectations. Both sides made mistakes and have not been at their best at times, but thats the nature of the fast modern game. If youre off by a bit, momentum can shift quickly. I’ve always loved the AB-bok matches over the years, and was worried razor’s 2 years had made a mess of the ABs that would be too big to fix before the RWC. Rennie has done a good job so far. As for the boks, great team with a lot of depth. Its a shame we will likely meet in the QF next year…who knows, maybe the aussies will upset us in the pool match? 🫣 another final between the NZ and SAF would be epic. If both sides continue to improve from this tour, my pick will be for one of them to win the tournament

B
Bazzallina 12 days ago

Lineout pressure Breakdown work and much better accuracy v LW are the main contributors to Boks win and they still shot themselves in the foot sometimes as ABs did maybe a few times more .

But add those to the errors the Boks forced and ABs unable to force the same amount out of Boks made for hard day at the office for my beloved ABs .

Boks def play that pressure game on multiple fronts but our boys not necessarily getting rolled .

All making for a beaut in Soweto

H
Hammer Head 12 days ago

Win first.

S
Sallworth007 12 days ago

So your okay with the blatant amount of head hits going uncalled when they involve Ardie Savea.. two weeks in a row.., come on

D
DG 12 days ago

Please underline the part where I said this, or anything like this.

W
Wayneo 12 days ago

Am I the only one who noticed the All Black plane was the one offside doing the flyover?

M
MM 12 days ago

Amazing how you disappeared from this site after the first test hammering the Boks took…….

B
Bazzallina 12 days ago

Haha good one Wayneo

R
Ruppansy 12 days ago

Good article thanks. Sorry for all the naysayers in the comments. I thought you captured the essence of the game well.

D
DG 12 days ago

Thanks. It’s all good. Some folks just need an outlet.

p
proooooovince 12 days ago

He didn’t change the 23 he just switched changed starting players around.

B
B 12 days ago

Trying to replicate a terror attack with a plane is not the way to respond to the haka.


Not in the spirit of the game - so that makes it peak Rassie.

L
Lou Cifer 11 days ago

WTF🤔Nah we not into doing Israel’s dirty work thanks cheers!

W
Wayneo 12 days ago

If you knew anything about aviation electronics in this day and age, then you would also know that this is all a load of garbage.

u
unknown 12 days ago

What a woos this author is….you do not speak for springbok supporters! Kak article and opinion!

B
B 12 days ago

The ‘special’ type of online Bok supporter.


Insulting all and sundry even when their team wins. Always when their team loses.


Rassie rubbing off on ya.

D
DG 12 days ago

What was kak? That Kolisi was amazing? That the Boks were the better team? That Kriel was immense and Reinach was slick? That Rennie moaned too much? What was the opinion you disagree with?

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close