Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Many areas of concern for the All Blacks, it's hard to know where to start

By Ben Smith
(Photo by Phil Walter/Getty Images)

The All Blacks‘ first missed tackle of the night took all of 40 seconds as Caelan Doris dummied away the outside defender Sam Whitelock and slipped through the grasp of a diving Nepo Laulala.

ADVERTISEMENT

Much like the second test in Dunedin, Ireland came out of the blocks fast and rolled over the All Blacks defence. Doris sliced up the middle first, then Ireland recycled rapidly and Sexton ran a cutter play to link with Hugo Keenan out the back.

The Irish fullback then drew a two-man tackle from David Havili and Akira Ioane to thread Robbie Henshaw into a gap, which led to break away down the left side.

Video Spacer

All Blacks post-match press conference

Video Spacer

All Blacks post-match press conference

Only a Beauden Barrett intercept saved face to prevent Ireland scoring inside two minutes.

It was almost a direct repeat of the opening passage in Dunedin where the sleepy All Black defence failed to stay connected, make disciplined reads or understand what was being thrown at them.

Once Doris was brought down deep into the backfield, not one All Black close by was interested in striking at the isolated runner in the backfield.

They were happy to give Gibson-Park an uncontested pill and a rapid quick recycle inviting Ireland with an open jaw to hit them again with another punch.

ADVERTISEMENT

All through the series the All Blacks struggled to control the action in close quarters. The All Black tight five, in particular, were largely responsible for that.

They were sluggish, soft and just slower than the hard-working Irish pack. Farrell’s mobile unit, led by workhorse Josh van der Flier, trod through them on too many occasions to count, using deft passing between them or just hard straight carries.

The ruck pressure by Foster’s side was almost non-existent which also played into Ireland’s hands. They did not have any trouble playing at the tempo they wanted.

Often technically poor and slow to react, the All Blacks did not hold or position themselves with strength over the ball to be in with a chance to win a penalty, a steal or even just slow the ball down frequently enough.

ADVERTISEMENT

When they did get it right, some other indiscretion let them down. Laulala had a critical steal overturned by Sam Cane taking a man off the ball, and then Ireland turned down the potential three points to maul straight over the All Blacks pack for their first five pointer.

Cane got one on the stroke of halftime but all too often the Irish cleanout blew the doors off any All Black that dared to go near the ruck, which was not often.

With execution errors and poor discipline, the defence was put under the spotlight frequently in the first half and continued to be cut open by an Irish side that operates with surgical precision.

Two tries in Wellington were crafted within three phases of a set-piece launch, finished by Hugo Keenan and Robbie Henshaw.

The All Blacks’ attacking game has not been much better than the defence over the last two tests.

The early plan in the third test was to send a barrage of high balls at Hugo Keenan and Mack Hansen, but the contests were rarely won back.

The first prime time attacking opportunity in Irish territory resulted in Beauden Barrett launching a spiral bomb on first phase. The wobbly high ball, despite being difficult to catch, was marked for a free kick resulting in a waste of possession.

It was the same wasteful tactic that the All Blacks used at the 2019 Rugby World Cup against South Africa and England. Ireland cleared the line and then stole the next lineout throw.

Akira Ioane and Ardie Savea are brilliant ball carriers who bring world class power to the table, but asking them to carry the team forward through contact is very one dimensional.

Both loose forwards got individual tries on their own accord to get the All Blacks back into the game in the second half but it was all too individualistic. Will Jordan’s spectacular effort was the same, relying upon a star to make something happen.

Related

Once New Zealand rugby was the best in the world with ball skills, creating and exploiting space with open running rugby, now it has become monotone by default.

They don’t have the cohesion to run schemes like Ireland with well-timed running lines and passes, so they resort to giving the likes of Ioane and Savea as many carries as possible to generate go forward.

The strike plans go something like this: a simple backs play to crash up the first ruck, followed by a Ioane carry coming around the corner, followed by a Savea carry around the corner.

Then maybe try a strike phase on the fourth phase, which often doesn’t come into fruition as a bad pass or key mistimed running line kills the flow.

That’s if the All Blacks can get past the first three phases, which has been a serious issue over the last two tests.

The All Blacks game has morphed into smashing through or over people through one pass carries off 9 in the absence of smart, crafted ball-playing and line running to open up a gap with varied ball movement.

The high number of handling and execution errors means they often can’t even play the power game.

Their best passage of play was early in the second half where they strung 20 plus phases together which led to the Savea try, where the game plan worked momentarily. The side played with intensity that was completely missing in the first half but it was a short-lived burst.

With 10 minutes to go the All Blacks were down two scores and had a scrum right in front of the sticks, splitting the Irish backs, they were in desperate need of a try in that moment to keep the game alive.

Debutant Roger Tuivasa-Sheck had just come on the field and had right wing Mack Hansen marked up on him one-on-one. They could not even muster a carry for the dynamic stepper to work his magic from 10-metres out.

Instead, the scrum was monstered and they turned over possession cheaply shortly after.

In phase play, when they did try to move the ball with a bit of width, too often the Barrett boys and Havili added too much depth on the ball and the forwards would only move forward if they were taking a carry.

It was stagnant, backpedaling, shovel-ball rugby with little-to-no directness.

The tactic of hitting the third forward runner in the pod had a very short expiry date. It was successful in the first test but once Ireland knew what was coming, it had to be binned.

The third man has no cleaning support on the outside so if he is chopped down behind the gain line or dragged sideways, the ruck is always going to be under pressure. The likes of Henshaw and van der Flier were flying up to hit that runner if they tried it.

The All Blacks’ ruck was too slow, too often, resulting in slow service from Aaron Smith and static ball onward from there. The cleaning work from the pack isn’t efficient enough to generate the ruck speed that Ireland have.

Overall, Ireland were just better in every aspect of the game so it is no surprise that they claimed a historic win in the third test. They were fantastic and thoroughly deserved the series.

It is a monumental achievement for Farrell’s Irish side, becoming just the third team in history to beat the All Blacks in New Zealand in a three-match series along side South Africa in 1937 and Australia in 1986.

It seems imperative now that the All Blacks avoid a quarter-final matchup with Ireland, who are unlikely to repeat the horrors of 2019 after achieving this feat. They have Foster’s number on speed dial.

There are so many areas of concern for the All Blacks it’s hard to know where to start, but the good news is that when they next play the Springboks in South Africa, they will not have to play the world’s best structured attack.

The Boks cannot run anything like Ireland can, so the reads will be easier and the defence will not need to improve to see better results.

It will be direct, physical, unimaginative stuff that the All Blacks will just have to man up for.

The best thing Foster could hope for would be for the Springboks to get ahead of themselves and copy Ireland’s formula, as they would not doubt implode without the same level of skills and the All Blacks counter-attack game would run riot.

However, after a historically bad run against France and Ireland, they will travel to South Africa as underdogs. The Springboks have to be short favourites at home to sweep them over the two tests purely on this alone.

Expectations are now terribly low for this All Blacks side that most would expect one, if not two, losses in the Republic.

But the Springboks are not Ireland, so the script will be written differently. All the expectations now weigh on South Africa whose adoring fans are desperate to be crowned the world’s best again.

Well, here are Foster’s All Blacks who have just lost four of their last five tests. The perfect lamb.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 6

Sam Warburton | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

Japan Rugby League One | Sungoliath v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Japan Rugby League One | Spears v Wild Knights | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 10 | Six Nations Final Round Review

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | How can New Zealand rugby beat this Ireland team

Beyond 80 | Episode 5

Rugby Europe Men's Championship Final | Georgia v Portugal | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 7 hours ago
Jake White: Are modern rugby players actually better?

This is the problem with conservative mindsets and phycology, and homogenous sports, everybody wants to be the same, use the i-win template. Athlete wise everyone has to have muscles and work at the gym to make themselves more likely to hold on that one tackle. Do those players even wonder if they are now more likely to be tackled by that player as a result of there “work”? Really though, too many questions, Jake. Is it better Jake? Yes, because you still have that rugby of ole that you talk about. Is it at the highest International level anymore? No, but you go to your club or checkout your representative side and still engage with that ‘beautiful game’. Could you also have a bit of that at the top if coaches encouraged there team to play and incentivized players like Damian McKenzie and Ange Capuozzo? Of course we could. Sadly Rugby doesn’t, or didn’t, really know what direction to go when professionalism came. Things like the state of northern pitches didn’t help. Over the last two or three decades I feel like I’ve been fortunate to have all that Jake wants. There was International quality Super Rugby to adore, then the next level below I could watch club mates, pulling 9 to 5s, take on the countries best in representative rugby. Rugby played with flair and not too much riding on the consequences. It was beautiful. That largely still exists today, but with the world of rugby not quite getting things right, the picture is now being painted in NZ that that level of rugby is not required in the “pathway” to Super Rugby or All Black rugby. You might wonder if NZR is right and the pathway shouldn’t include the ‘amateur’, but let me tell you, even though the NPC might be made up of people still having to pull 9-5s, we know these people still have dreams to get out of that, and aren’t likely to give them. They will be lost. That will put a real strain on the concept of whether “visceral thrill, derring-do and joyful abandon” type rugby will remain under the professional level here in NZ. I think at some point that can be eroded as well. If only wanting the best athlete’s at the top level wasn’t enough to lose that, shutting off the next group, or level, or rugby players from easy access to express and showcase themselves certainly will. That all comes back around to the same question of professionalism in rugby and whether it got things right, and rugby is better now. Maybe the answer is turning into a “no”?

35 Go to comments
j
john 10 hours ago
Will the Crusaders' decline spark a slow death for New Zealand rugby?

But here in Australia we were told Penney was another gun kiwi coach, for the Tahs…….and yet again it turned out the kiwi coach was completely useless. Another con job on Australian rugby. As was Robbie Deans, as was Dave Rennie. Both coaches dumped from NZ and promoted to Australia as our saviour. And the Tahs lap them up knowing they are second rate and knowing that under pressure when their short comings are exposed in Australia as well, that they will fall in below the largest most powerful province and choose second rate Tah players to save their jobs. As they do and exactly as Joe Schmidt will do. Gauranteed. Schmidt was dumped by NZ too. That’s why he went overseas. That why kiwi coaches take jobs in Australia, to try and prove they are not as bad as NZ thought they were. Then when they get found out they try and ingratiate themselves to NZ again by dragging Australian teams down with ridiculous selections and game plans. NZ rugby’s biggest problem is that it can’t yet transition from MCaw Cheatism. They just don’t know how to try and win on your merits. It is still always a contest to see how much cheating you can get away with. Without a cheating genius like McCaw, they are struggling. This I think is why my wise old mate in NZ thinks Robertson will struggle. The Crusaders are the nursery of McCaw Cheatism. Sean Fitzpatrick was probably the father of it. Robertson doesn’t know anything else but other countries have worked it out.

39 Go to comments
A
Adrian 12 hours ago
Will the Crusaders' decline spark a slow death for New Zealand rugby?

Thanks Nick The loss of players to OS, injury and retirement is certainly not helping the Crusaders. Ditto the coach. IMO Penny is there to hold the fort and cop the flak until new players and a new coach come through,…and that's understood and accepted by Penny and the Crusaders hierarchy. I think though that what is happening with the Crusaders is an indicator of what is happening with the other NZ SRP teams…..and the other SRP teams for that matter. Not enough money. The money has come via the SR competition and it’s not there anymore. It's in France, Japan and England. Unless or until something is done to make SR more SELLABLE to the NZ/Australia Rugby market AND the world rugby market the $s to keep both the very best players and the next rung down won't be there. They will play away from NZ more and more. I think though that NZ will continue to produce the players and the coaches of sufficient strength for NZ to have the capacity to stay at the top. Whether they do stay at the top as an international team will depend upon whether the money flowing to SRP is somehow restored, or NZ teams play in the Japan comp, or NZ opts to pick from anywhere. As a follower of many sports I’d have to say that the organisation and promotion of Super Rugby has been for the last 20 years closest to the worst I’ve ever seen. This hasn't necessarily been caused by NZ, but it’s happened. Perhaps it can be fixed, perhaps not. The Crusaders are I think a symptom of this, not the cause

39 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Diamond demands law change while accusing Tigers of illegal activity Diamond demands law change while accusing Tigers of illegal activity
Search