Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

The Saracens verdict on how the Simpson loan deal is working out

By Liam Heagney
(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Mark McCall has lauded the impact ex-England international Joe Simpson is making during his short stay at Saracens on their return to the Gallagher Premiership. It was September 13, in the wake of the September 9 suspension handed down to new signing Ivan van Zyl, that the Londoners announced they had secured the services of the 33-year-old for a month to help get their season going. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Simpson so far has come off the bench in the opening night win over Bristol and having started in last weekend’s bye round friendly win over Ealing, this Saturday’s game at Leicester will be the last game before South African van Zyl is free to play again. 

“We are so fortunate to find someone as experienced as Joe to fill that short-term gap with Ivan getting a ban so that was great,” enthused McCall when asked for his verdict on Simpson, the scrum-half who won his one and only England cap as a sub at the 2011 World Cup. 

Video Spacer

Ollie Phillips guests on the latest RugbyPass Offload

Video Spacer

Ollie Phillips guests on the latest RugbyPass Offload

“But also he has just fitted in brilliantly. He knew quite a few of our players. He had played with Billy (Vunipola) and Alex Lozowski when they were at Wasps together, but he has been brilliant. 

“We played an A-team game against Ealing last Friday night and Joe played in that. He had a great influence on the younger players in that group so we have been really pleased with him.”

The reason why Saracens sought out Simpson on a short-term deal from Gloucester was that van Zyl, the ex-Springboks half-back, was red-carded in a pre-season match away to Ulster for tackling the airborne Craig Gilroy. At the resulting disciplinary hearing, van Zyl accepted the charge and was given a four-match suspension. McCall wouldn’t be drawn on whether the length of the suspension was warranted. “It is what it is and he will be available to play after this weekend.”

However, in the full judgment published after the hearing, it emerged that while the RFU agreed the offence “was not grossly negligent, it was sufficiently serious to warrant a mid-range entry point”. This was in contrast to the Saracens view where a submission in support of van Zyl said the offence should be assessed at the low end of the scale of seriousness. 

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 6

Sam Warburton | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

Japan Rugby League One | Sungoliath v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Japan Rugby League One | Spears v Wild Knights | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 10 | Six Nations Final Round Review

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | How can New Zealand rugby beat this Ireland team

Beyond 80 | Episode 5

Rugby Europe Men's Championship Final | Georgia v Portugal | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

B
Bull Shark 55 minutes ago
Jake White: Are modern rugby players actually better?

Of the rugby I’ve born witness to in my lifetime - 1990 to date - I recognize great players throughout those years. But I have no doubt the game and the players are on average better today. So I doubt going back further is going to prove me wrong. The technical components of the game, set pieces, scrums, kicks, kicks at goal. And in general tactics employed are far more efficient, accurate and polished. Professional athletes that have invested countless hours on being accurate. There is one nation though that may be fairly competitive in any era - and that for me is the all blacks. And New Zealand players in general. NZ produces startling athletes who have fantastic ball skills. And then the odd phenomenon like Brooke. Lomu. Mcaw. Carter. Better than comparing players and teams across eras - I’ve often had this thought - that it would be very interesting to have a version of the game that is closer to its original form. What would the game look like today if the rules were rolled back. Not rules that promote safety obviously - but rules like: - a try being worth 1 point and conversion 2 points. Hence the term “try”. Earning a try at goals. Would we see more attacking play? - no lifting in the lineouts. - rucks and break down laws in general. They looked like wrestling matches in bygone eras. I wonder what a game applying 1995 rules would look like with modern players. It may be a daft exercise, but it would make for an interesting spectacle celebrating “purer” forms of the game that roll back the rules dramatically by a few versions. Would we come to learn that some of the rules/combinations of the rules we see today have actually made the game less attractive? I’d love to see an exhibition match like that.

29 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Storm clouds gather over Biarritz with owner poised to bail out Storm clouds gather over Biarritz with owner poised to bail out
Search