Set of Six: Is Queensland's reign finally coming to an end?
New South Wales delivered one of their most dominant State of Origin performances in years to win the first game 28-4 last night. Is Queensland’s time up, or were they just missing JT?
How good were NSW?
Full credit to Laurie Daley and his team for turning back the clock and putting in an old-school Origin effort.
NSW had stars all across the paddock. Wests Tigers fullback James Tedesco put all the contract nonsense behind him and put in an Origin performance for the ages, tearing it up on attack and defending like Gandalf staring down a Balrog.
Prodigal son Jarryd Hayne was the lynchpin of NSW’s 2014 series victory and he was massively influential again in Game 1. Andrew Fifita played with the kind of controlled fury that made it seem like someone told he was playing against a team of junior referees.
Good to be back playing #Origin eh @JarrydHayne !? #NRL pic.twitter.com/UE4e40XKsb
— NRL (@NRL) May 31, 2017
The much-maligned Mitchell Pearce played with the sort of calm determination that told you he was very aware of the torrent of dog molestation memes that would be uncorked if he overplayed his hand and was responsible for a NSW loss. And debutant Nathan Peats performed two very important tasks in his first match in the sky blue – providing efficient service from dummy half to a dominant pack and not being Robbie Farah.
NSW’s biggest challenge now is to avoid getting ahead of themselves – if the last ten years have taught us anything its that Queensland isn’t dead until the body has been decapitated and the head drop-kicked over the black dot.
Where to now for Queensland?
The main question for Queensland entering the match was how they would cope with the injury-enforced loss of Origin stalwarts Johnathan Thurston, Matt Scott and Greg Inglis.
In previous editions Queensland have relied on their ability to drag legendary performances out of their lesser lights, confident that whoever pulled on the Maroon jersey would grow another leg to match their additional head. This time it seemed like Queensland had finally run out of magic and were confronted with the unfortunate fact that a team filled with out-of-form and over-the-hill players played less like Cinderella and more like pumpkins. In Game 1 it seemed like Queensland had reached a critical mass of mediocre players, their true Origin stars too few in number and unable to draw great performances out of the lesser lights.
Cooper Cronk chats to Darren Lockyer after FT!#Origin#NRL pic.twitter.com/5epjVKpMIj
— NRL (@NRL) May 31, 2017
Justin O’Neill’s Origin career looks cooked and a host of forwards, including Nate Myles, Aiden Guerra and Jacob Lillyman, were well off the pace. It would be unlike Queensland to make wholesale changes for a must-win match in Sydney but based on last night’s performance if the Banana Benders don’t try something radical then they can kiss the series goodbye.
In Game 1 Queensland looked like an ageing side desperately in need of an injection of youth. They will be hesitant to rely on Origin rookies in such a crucial clash but the spongey performance of the forwards and the gaping holes in the centres demands some new faces and an added dash of aggression. Coen Hess and Jarrod Wallace would add some starch to the bench and Cameron Munster and Valentine Holmes must come into calculations for the centres. Surely Billy Slater will be recalled to the custodian role and Johnathan Thurston is odds on to make the biggest comeback since Alfie. Queenslanders love an overwrought comeback story almost as much as Wayne Bennett loves Darius Boyd.
Why does the NRL continue to allow the scheduling of Origin to derail the NRL Premiership?
It’s been said before but the scheduling of Origin really needs to be re-assessed to stop it derailing the NRL season. The last round perfectly illustrated the absurdity of the impact of State of Origin on the integrity of the Premiership. The Broncos had their six-game win streak snapped at the hands of the previously woeful Warriors, largely attributable to the fact that they were missing nearly half their starting line-up. The resurgent Roosters showdown with the enterprising Raiders shaped as a blockbuster clash but ended up a damp squib due to the absence of crucial players.
It seems ludicrous that teams are forced to contest matches worth competition points with squads missing key members due to the NRL’s scheduling. While injury and suspension are matters of luck inherent to any sport, the scheduling of the Origin period punishes the best-performing sides. It strips them of them of their best players and forcing them to compete against other teams not necessarily disadvantaged in the same fashion. It is a simple principle of any fairly organized competition that each match should be of equal value in determining the best team, but in the NRL this is simply not the case.
[rugbypass-ad-banner id=”1473723684″]
If the NRL is hamstrung by broadcasting arrangements and can’t move all three Origin games to standalone weekends (creating the least amount of disruption to the NRL competition) then perhaps another solution would be viable – offering salary cap discounts to teams for players involved in Origin. If Cameron Smith misses three games for Melbourne and has limited involvement in another three then surely the Storm are due some sort of compensation? If they received dispensation for their players’ Origin involvement then they could use extra salary cap space to bolster their squad in other ways. Obviously this assumes that the NRL doesn’t tacitly endorse an unfair system that allows mediocre teams to make up ground on the ladder at the expense of the better teams during the Origin period, creating an artificial boost that gives more clubs a chance of playing finals football – and increasing ratings and ticket sales at the business end of the competition.
Are Penrith contenders or pretenders?
After an underwhelming start, the chic pre-season Premiership pick Penrith find their season at a crossroads. Currently sitting in tenth and lying two points adrift of the top eight the Panthers have found their season cruelled so far by a rash of injuries, form slumps and off-the-field issues. In retrospect the Panthers were primed to underwhelm – a young team packed with talent facing massive expectations but short on big game experience. Crucially, they lack a coach with a track record of coaxing a team through such growing pains – at this point it seems like Anthony Griffin might belong to that middle class of mediocre NRL coaches who look the part but seem to struggle to add much to their team’s success.
Now Bryce Cartwright is out with a long term knee injury, prompting a re-shuffle of the backline, a move that might see Matt Moylan emulate Darren Lockyer moving from fullback to assume his destiny as a ball-playing standoff. One positive aspect of the Panthers’ form slump is that their squad is largely unaffected by Origin – if they had played up to their potential then they could well be missing the likes of Matt Moylan, James Tamou, Trent Merrin and maybe even Nathan Cleary and Tyrone Peachey.
SAUCE IS BACK! ?? See the Panthers side to face the Bulldogs: https://t.co/vuxM1vWBB9#pantherpride ? pic.twitter.com/GuFPcPsK4R
— Penrith Panthers (@PenrithPanthers) May 30, 2017
Crucially for the Panthers only two of their next nine opponents currently have winning records with the added bonus of facing no top four sides in that span either. If Penrith are going to save their Premiership aspirations they will need to make their move in the next two months – fortunately they have the schedule to do it.
Are we overdue for a Bunker blow-up?
It feels like a while since there has been a match-defining Bunker breakdown. Is it possible that the NRL has ironed out the kinks with the much-maligned video ref system? Or is the Bunker just biding its time, waiting for the optimal opportunity to make a truly braindead decision that turns the tide of a crucial match? It would be just like the NRL to blow most of the goodwill built up by a cracking Origin match by ending a game on a truly inscrutable Bunker decision – I’m picking the Bulldogs-Panthers game to be a likely candidate for a match to be ruined by Bunker incompetence. It’s been a good while since we’ve enjoyed a proper Des Hasler blow-up as well and the Bunker seems tailor made to make Dessy see red. Bonus points if he can work a Harry Potter reference into his meltdown.
Match of the Round: Roosters vs Broncos
A sort of minor sequel to Origin, this match will see two top five teams square off to see who can recover from their respective Origin induced stumbles last round. A whopping 11 players are scheduled to back up in this, with the Broncos the worst affected with six players lacing their boots after playing on Wednesday. It’s always difficult to predict how the Origin hangover will impact player performance but the Broncos are well practiced in dealing with the phenomenon.
The Roosters are favoured as the home team but it’s hard to see the Broncos meekly submitting after last week’s loss to the Warriors – master coach Wayne Bennett will be hell bent on ensuring that their six-match winning streak isn’t succeeded by a multi-match losing streak. This has all the hallmarks of a Saturday evening classic – two rep-studded sides with premiership aspirations looking to fight off the Origin hangover and snag two vital competition points. Look for the Roosters to continue the week of Queensland misery and narrowly jag the win.
PICKS (Last Week 1-3, Season Record 56-36): Storm over Knights / Eels over Warriors / Dragons over Tigers / Roosters over Broncos / Cowboys over Titans / Raiders over Sea Eagles / Panthers over Bulldogs
Comments on RugbyPass
Thanks for that Marshy, noticed you didn't say who is gonna win it. We know who ain't gonna win it - your Crusaders outfit. They've gone from having arguably the best Super Rugby first five ever, to having a clutch of rookies. Hurricanes all the way!
1 Go to commentsGeez you really have to question the NRLs ability to produce players of quality. Its pathetic. Dont the 25mil in Aus produce enough quality womens players. Sad.
1 Go to commentsBulls fan here, and agree 100% with the conclusion (and little else) of this article. SA sides should absolutely f-off from the champs cup until we get fair scheduling, equal support for travel arrangements and home semis. You know, like all the european teams get.
20 Go to commentsI’m yet to see why Grace would be an ABs contender. He’s pedestrian and lacks the dominance required of a top flight 8.
8 Go to commentsGee my Highlanders were terrible. They have gone backwards since the start of the season. The trouble began when we left Millar behind to prep as the 10 against the Brumbies and he was disconnected from the team that came back from Aussie. We rested Patchell for that game and we blew an avalanche of ball in good attacking positions in the 1st half. Against the Rebels we seem to of gone into a pod system with forwards hanging off from the breakdown leaving Fakatava to secure our ball!
72 Go to commentsPot Kettle, the English and French teams have done it for years.
20 Go to commentsHas virtually played every minute of previous games. Back row of Li Lo Willie , Grace and Blackadder would be the 1. Crusaders issue is a very average 1st 5 who cannot run. Kicking in general play is also below par They need to put Yong Kemara in. He must have so.e talent for them to bring him down from Waikato. Hoehepa would struggle to play in so.e club sided
8 Go to commentsI hope this a good thing making all these changes!
2 Go to commentsThe Hurricanes are good, especially with a decent coach now. However, let’s be real, the Crusaders and Chiefs are clearly a good degree weaker without the players they’ve lost overseas now. The Canes lost one player. It’s also why the aussie teams ‘seem’ to be stronger.
9 Go to commentsOr you could develop your own players instead of constantly taking from the SH competition and weakening it in the process? With all the player and financial resources these unions have compared to SH countries you’d think they could manage that, or is weakening the SH comps and their national sides an added bonus? Probably.
3 Go to commentsNot so fast Aaron, we might need you in black yet lol. God knows he’d be a lot less nerve-racking than hot and (very) cold players like Perofeta. It’s really a shame Reuben Love isn’t playing 10, we’ve got enough 15 options.
4 Go to commentsAnd those from the NH still seem to be puzzled (and delighted) why NZ’s depth isn’t what it once was. Over 600 NZ players overseas, that’s insane. This sort of deal is why Super Rugby coaches have admitted they struggle now to find enough quality to fill out their squads.
6 Go to commentsArticle intéressant ! La question devrait régulièrement se poser pour les jeunes français originaires de Nouvelle-Calédonie, Wallis-et-Futuna et de Polynésie entre la Nouvelle-Zélande et la Métropole… Difficile pour la fédération française de rugby de se positionner : soit le choix est fait de dénicher les jeunes talents et de les faire venir très tôt en Métropole, au risque de les déraciner, soit on prend le risque de se les faire “piller” par les All Blacks qui, telle une araignée, essaye de récupérer tous les talents des îles du Pacifique… À la France de se défendre en développant l’aura du XV de France et des clubs français dans ses collectivités d’Outre-mer !
3 Go to commentsWrong bay. He needs to come to the REAL BAY which is Bay Of Plenty and have a crack at making the Chiefs.
3 Go to commentsIs Barrett going play full back??? They already have all the centers…
15 Go to commentsForgive my ignorance, I might not fully understand so would appreciate clarification: Didn’t the Bulls have to fly with three different carriers, paid for by the South African Rugby Union, whilst Edinburgh got a chartered flight sponsored by EPCR? Also, as far as I understand it South African teams don’t yet share in the revenue from the competition and are not allowed to host Semi-finals or Finals at home. Surely if everyone wants South Africans to “take the competition seriously” then they must make South Africans feel welcome, allow them to share in the revenue, and give them the same levels of access as the teams from the other countries. Just a reminder that South Africa has a large and passionate Rugby audience. Just by virtue of our teams being a part of these competitions means that more of us are likely to watch the knockout games, even if our teams haven’t qualified. It would be silly to alienate such a large audience by making them feel unwelcome.
20 Go to commentsFirst of all. This guy is very much behind the curve. All the bleating, whingeing, whining and moaning took place days ago already. Not adding anything to the topic other than more bleating, whingeing, whining and moaning. 🍼 Second of all, not one mention of the fact that South African teams can’t get home semi finals or finals. The tournament was undermined and devalued by the administrators. 🤡 Thirdly, football teams often have to juggle selections in mid week games, premier games, champions league games etc. and will from time to time prioritize certain titles over others. 🐒 And lastly FEK Neil, and anyone else for that matter, for insisting on telling teams how to manage themselves. If they make what is largely a business decision that suits them and doesn’t suit you - tough shite. 💩 It’s not rocket science as to why the Bulls did what they did. If this guy is too slow to figure it out (and is deliberately not mentioning one of the key reasons why) then he isn’t a journalist. He should join the rest of us pundit plebs in comments section. 🥴
20 Go to commentsSo the first door to knock on Rob is Parliament followed by HMRC. The Irish Revenue deliver a 40% tax relief rebate on the HIGHEST EARNING TEN YEARS of every pro Irish rugby players contract earnings at retirement. That goes a long way to both retaining their best talent and freeing up wages for marquee players. Who knows, if that had been in place in the UK, you might not have been able to poach Hoggy and Jonny Gray from Glasgow…!!!
3 Go to comments1. True, if that “free” ticket means access to all but the prized exhibit - EVIP only. SA cannot host semis, even if they’ve earned it (see Sharks vs ASM Clermont Auvergne at… Twickenham Stoop). 2. Why no selective outrage over Lyon doing the exact same thing a week earlier? Out of all the countries France send the most “B teams”, why nobody talking about “disrespect” and “prioritising domestic leagues” and “kicking them out”? 3. Why no mention of the Sharks fielding all of their Springboks for the second rate Challenge cup QF? No commitment? 4. Why no mention of all the SA teams qualifying for respective euro knock out comps in the two seasons they’ve been in it? How many euro teams have qualified for KO’s in their history? Can’t compete? 5. Why no mention of SA teams beating French and English giants La Rochelle and Saracens? How many euro teams have done that in their history? Add no quality? The fact is that SA teams are only in their second season in europe, with no status and a fraction of the resources. Since joining the URC, SA has seen a repatriation of a number of players, and this will only grow once SA start sharing in the profits of competing in these comps, meaning bigger squads with greater depth and quality, meaning they don’t have to prioritise comps as they have to now - they don’t have imports from Pacifica and South America and everywhere else in between like “European” teams have - also less “Saffas” in Prem and T14, that’s what we want right? 'If the South Africans are in, they need to be all in' True, and we have to ensure we give them the same status and resources as we give everyone else to do just that. A small compromise on scheduling will go a long way in avoiding these situations, but guess what, France and England wont compromise on scheduling because they ironically… prioritise their domestic comps, go figure!
20 Go to commentsthe success of the premiership can be summarized by : only 10 teams. It makes a huge difference with the overcrowded top 14 (let us not talk about Leinster and URC…)
2 Go to comments