Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Progression does not mean experience needs to be thrown out the window

By Online Editors
(Photo by Getty Images)

There is this trend to muster out the more senior members of the rugby community because they are regarded as ‘superfluous’.

ADVERTISEMENT

The often desperate need for change sometimes overlooks the true value experience can bring.

You will often hear the claim: ‘Your time is up, old codger, it is now our turn.’

Now I am all for ameliorating and fine-tuning to have a better product.

But just because a suggestion comes from a ‘graybeard’, it doesn’t mean his ideas are dated or out of sync with modern trends or needs.

Video Spacer

Andy Rowe turned quizmaster this week as he put Big Jim and Goodey’s knowledge to the test in another quarantine quiz.

Video Spacer

Andy Rowe turned quizmaster this week as he put Big Jim and Goodey’s knowledge to the test in another quarantine quiz.

We experience it in all aspects of everyday life, but more so in the need for revitalization in the rugby industry.

It was played up again this week when respected Springbok and mahatma Dawie Snyman penned a perspicacious and enlightening column for Rugby365.

As usual, there were those applauding and being appreciative of some of his bodacious suggestions – including ‘yellow cards’ for match officials.

And, on the flip side of the coin, there were those who dismissed his contribution as the ramblings of an out-of-touch oddball.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, in a subsequent discussion with Dawie Snyman, it became very apparent that most of the criticism levelled at his suggestions were the result of subjective critique by people who made no attempt to understand or explore the background of his proposals.

Let me illustrate.

I love nothing more than to sit down for a chat with my colleague Paul Dobson – a decorated and well-respected writer, a man with 50 years of experience in refereeing and rugby.

I learn more from listening to Paul, because of his vast knowledge and background. Because of his wisdom and experiences, I become wiser and more informed.

As they say, listening is learning.

It was a similarly enlightening experience when Dawie Snyman put some context to his suggestions this week.

ADVERTISEMENT

I was well aware of Dawie’s achievements as a player. Those are well documented.

However, his proposals were not the works of a disgruntled former player. He is still very much involved with the mentoring of present coaches, at various levels.

They were the conception of a seasoned and forethoughtful visionary with heaps of very useful experience in the administration of the game – a person willing to share his contemplations and ideas.

Given that Dawie Snyman served in the administration of the game since the mid-1970s – first at Stellenbosch University and later also at the Western Province Rugby Football Union – he has a lot of insight that could be tapped into.

I am not, for one minute, suggesting he should be hauled back onto some or other executive committee.

However, sitting down and listening to ‘experienced’ former administrators like this could not hurt, especially in relation to the ethical side of the game.

This is the primary factor that should guide the game through time.

We are often far too quick to dismiss people because they are ‘old’.

Let’s not forget that Stellenbosch is the biggest ‘club’ in the world – with 1,300 players in its heyday – functioning much like a province or franchise today, with all the various committees and sub-committees.

Making an organisation like that function successfully takes some doing.

Then there is the ‘innovation’ of two referees on the field, which to this day still functions successfully in the Stellenbosch hostel leagues.

So why could it not work elsewhere?

Perhaps, just perhaps, it is – as Dawie said – the attitude adaptation of the vision of those running the game at present.

As that well-documented proverb goes: ‘Where there’s a will there’s a way.’

Maybe if the attitude of players, coaches and referees change, we may not need radical changes to save the game from ruin.

With that in mind, go read Dawie Snyman’s suggestions again.

With the right behaviour and demeanour perhaps the number of disciplinary hearings will decline – just as they did at Stellenbosch University when attitudes and circumstances changed.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 8

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Steelers v Sungoliath | Full Match Replay

Rugby Europe Women's Championship | Netherlands v Spain

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
Senzo Cicero 18 hours ago
'If the South Africans are in, they need to be all in'

1. True, if that “free” ticket means access to all but the prized exhibit - EVIP only. SA cannot host semis, even if they’ve earned it (see Sharks vs ASM Clermont Auvergne at… Twickenham Stoop). 2. Why no selective outrage over Lyon doing the exact same thing a week earlier? Out of all the countries France send the most “B teams”, why nobody talking about “disrespect” and “prioritising domestic leagues” and “kicking them out”? 3. Why no mention of the Sharks fielding all of their Springboks for the second rate Challenge cup QF? No commitment? 4. Why no mention of all the SA teams qualifying for respective euro knock out comps in the two seasons they’ve been in it? How many euro teams have qualified for KO’s in their history? Can’t compete? 5. Why no mention of SA teams beating French and English giants La Rochelle and Saracens? How many euro teams have done that in their history? Add no quality? The fact is that SA teams are only in their second season in europe, with no status and a fraction of the resources. Since joining the URC, SA has seen a repatriation of a number of players, and this will only grow once SA start sharing in the profits of competing in these comps, meaning bigger squads with greater depth and quality, meaning they don’t have to prioritise comps as they have to now - they don’t have imports from Pacifica and South America and everywhere else in between like “European” teams have - also less “Saffas” in Prem and T14, that’s what we want right? 'If the South Africans are in, they need to be all in' True, and we have to ensure we give them the same status and resources as we give everyone else to do just that. A small compromise on scheduling will go a long way in avoiding these situations, but guess what, France and England wont compromise on scheduling because they ironically… prioritise their domestic comps, go figure!

21 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The overlooked Ireland U20s lock who forged an unlikely Super Rugby Pacific career The overlooked Ireland U20s lock who forged an unlikely SRP career
Search